ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07483333Updated Sep 15, 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of SPARCS and Unified Protocol for Youth With Chronic Medical Conditions and Trauma-Related Distress

An interventional study of Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress - Group and Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents - Group in Trauma Exposure, Trauma and Trauma and Stressor Related Disorder, sponsored by Anthony Vesco. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Anthony Vesco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of trauma-focused therapies for improving mental health symptoms and daily functioning in youth with chronic medical conditions who have experienced psychological trauma and trauma-related distress. The study evaluates two evidence-based cognitive-behavioral therapies - Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS) and the Unified Protocol (UP) - delivered in group and individual formats to determine which approach, or combination of approaches, best reduces trauma symptoms and supports coping and adjustment. The study will also help researchers understand how to best support youth who continue to experience distress after an initial round of therapy.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does SPARCS group therapy or UP group therapy lead to greater improvements in trauma symptoms and functional impairment?
  • For youth who do not show enough improvement after group therapy, does adding SPARCS or UP individual therapy lead to better outcomes?
  • Which sequence of group and individual therapies leads to the greatest improvements in trauma symptoms and functioning?

Researchers will compare two evidence-based therapies currently offered at Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Youth will first be randomly assigned to receive either SPARCS or UP in a group format. After completing group therapy, youth who still need additional support will be randomly assigned again to receive individual or family therapy using SPARCS or UP. This stepwise approach will help identify which sequence of therapies leads to the best overall outcomes for youth.

Participants will:

  • Take part in group therapy sessions using either SPARCS or UP
  • For those needing additional support after group therapy, participate in individual SPARCS or UP therapy
  • Complete brief assessments of mental health and daily functioning at enrollment, and every 12 weeks thereafter for 48 weeks, as part of their regular care through Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Supporting Purposeful Interventions \& Resilience in Trauma (SPIRIT) program
Read the detailed description

The Supporting Purposeful Interventions \& Resilience in Trauma (SPIRIT) program at Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago provides trauma-informed, evidence-based care for youth ages 8-18 with chronic medical conditions and psychological trauma exposure who are experiencing trauma-related distress. Youth with chronic medical conditions are at increased risk for psychological stress due to frequent medical procedures, hospitalizations, and disease-related challenges, alongside prior family or community adversity. The SPIRIT program integrates behavioral health services into routine clinical care, using structured interventions to address trauma, improve coping, and support daily functioning.

This clinical trial uses a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design to evaluate two cognitive-behavioral therapies: Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS) and the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP). The SMART design allows researchers to compare the effectiveness of each therapy delivered in isolation and in sequence, providing data on which approach or combination of approaches is most effective for youth who respond differently to initial group treatment.

Participants first complete screening and baseline assessments within the SPIRIT program, which includes standardized measures of trauma-related symptoms, emotional distress, and daily functioning. Youth are then randomly assigned to receive group therapy using either SPARCS or UP. Group therapy sessions are delivered in alignment with routine clinical procedures and follow manualized protocols specific to each intervention. Youth who do not demonstrate sufficient improvement after group therapy are re-randomized to receive additional individual therapy using either SPARCS or UP. This stepwise approach allows the study to evaluate the effectiveness of both therapies in isolation, as well as the optimal sequence of group followed by individual therapy.

Data collection is embedded within clinical care and occurs at multiple time points: enrollment/baseline, and every 12 weeks through 48 weeks. All participants are followed for up to 48 weeks to evaluate longitudinal changes in trauma symptoms, emotional well-being, and daily functioning. Data collection includes structured surveys, clinician ratings, and retrospective chart review conducted as part of program evaluation.

The SPIRIT SMART trial also allows for exploratory analyses of factors that may moderate treatment response, such as individual characteristics, medical complexity, and baseline symptom profiles. Findings from this study will provide valuable guidance for optimizing trauma-focused interventions within pediatric medical settings and support broader dissemination of effective practices for youth facing both medical and psychological challenges.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma Exposure
  • Trauma
  • Trauma and Stressor Related Disorder
  • Mental Health Functioning
  • Chronic Medical Conditions
  • Chronic Medical Condition
  • Chronic Medical Illness
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder PTSD
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorders
  • Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms
  • Posttraumatic Stress

Keywords

  • pediatric trauma
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • chronic medical conditions
  • pediatrics
  • trauma symptoms
  • trauma and stressor related disorder
  • trauma informed care
  • Sequential, Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial
  • Supporting Purposeful Interventions and Resilience in Trauma
  • Unified Protocol
  • Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 440 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 70 across 1,423 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Anthony Vesco as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Youth (aged 8-18 years) who received a SPIRIT program psychological trauma screening and were deemed clinically appropriate for SPIRIT group therapy. Clinically appropriate means the youth can historically engage in a group setting (e.g., school, camp, therapy group) without significant disruption to the group process or other participants.
  • Youth and parent/legal guardian are willing and able to provide /assent for randomization.
  • Youth and parent/legal guardian are fluent in English or Spanish.
  • Youth is not currently engaged in individual therapy at the time of enrollment (per patient/parent report).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wards of the state or DCFS youth in care.
  • Youth with reported or observed symptoms that would significantly impair group therapy engagement, including but not limited to: intellectual disability, moderate-to-severe autism spectrum disorder, active suicidal ideation, uncontrolled psychosis, or other acute psychiatric symptoms that could disrupt the group process.
  • Regular use of alcohol or other substances that interfere with participation or disrupt the group process.
  • Youth requiring immediate higher-level psychiatric care (e.g., intensive outpatient programming, partial hospitalization, inpatient psychiatric admission, or residential treatment) at the time of first randomization.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPARCS Group Therapy [Stage 1 Randomization]

    Participants are initially randomized to receive Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS) in a group format. Participants who do not show sufficient improvement after Stage 1 will be re-randomized to Stage 2 individual therapy (SPARCS or Unified Protocol).

    Behavioral: Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress - Group

  • Experimental
    Unified Protocol Group Therapy [Stage 1 Randomization]

    Participants are initially randomized to receive Unified Protocol (UP) in a group format. Participants who do not show sufficient improvement after Stage 1 will be re-randomized to Stage 2 individual therapy (SPARCS or UP).

    Behavioral: Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents - Group

  • Experimental
    SPARCS Individual Therapy for Non-Responders [Stage 2 Randomization]

    Participants who do not show sufficient improvement after Stage 1 group therapy and are re-randomized to individual therapy receive Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS) individual therapy. Sessions are tailored to participant needs and may include family involvement. Treatment duration is guided by participant response, with booster sessions as needed.

    Behavioral: Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress - Individual

  • Experimental
    UP Individual Therapy for Non-Responders [Stage 2 Randomization]

    Participants who do not show sufficient improvement after Stage 1 group therapy and are re-randomized to individual therapy receive Unified Protocol individual therapy. Sessions are tailored to participant needs. Treatment duration is guided by participant response, with booster sessions as needed.

    Behavioral: Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents - Individual

Interventions

  • BehavioralStructured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress - Group

    SPARCS is a manualized, cognitive-behavioral group program for youth (12-21 years) exposed to chronic interpersonal trauma or multiple trauma types, including community and domestic violence. The program is strength-based and present-focused, with adolescent-tailored content targeting affect regulation, impulsivity, self-perception, relationships, somatic symptoms, dissociation, avoidance, and challenges with personal purpose or worldview. SPARCS supports emotional, social, academic, and behavioral functioning and is appropriate for youth with or without PTSD experiencing ongoing trauma-related stress. Group sessions are delivered over 12-16 weekly, in-person sessions by licensed mental health providers.

    Also known as: SPARCS

  • BehavioralUnified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents - Group

    The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP) is a manualized, transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with emotional disorders, including trauma-related distress. UP targets underlying emotion regulation processes across anxiety, depression, and related symptoms. Group sessions teach participants to identify, understand, and modify maladaptive emotional responses while promoting adaptive coping. Core components include mindful emotional awareness, cognitive flexibility, exposure to avoided emotions, and behavioral activation. UP has been shown effective for youth with trauma-related distress and youth with chronic medical conditions. Group sessions are delivered over 12-16 weekly, in-person sessions by licensed mental health providers.

    Also known as: UP, Unified Protocol

  • BehavioralUnified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents - Individual

    The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP) is a manualized, transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with emotional disorders, including trauma-related distress. UP can be delivered in group or individual formats and targets underlying emotion regulation processes across anxiety, depression, and related symptoms. Sessions teach participants to identify, understand, and modify maladaptive emotional responses while promoting adaptive coping. Core components include mindful emotional awareness, cognitive flexibility, exposure to avoided emotions, and behavioral activation. UP has been shown to be effective for youth with trauma-related distress and youth with chronic medical conditions. Sessions are typically held weekly, with duration guided by participant response and maintenance or booster sessions provided as needed.

  • BehavioralStructured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress - Individual

    SPARCS Individual is a manualized, skills-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth (12-21 years) exposed to chronic interpersonal trauma or multiple trauma types. Individual sessions are tailored to each participant's clinical needs, targeting affect regulation, impulsivity, self-perception, relationships, somatic symptoms, dissociation, avoidance, and challenges with personal purpose or worldview. Individual therapy may involve family participation and supports emotional, social, academic, and behavioral functioning. Sessions are typically held weekly, with duration guided by participant response and maintenance or booster sessions provided as needed.

    Also known as: SPARCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Traumatic Stress Screening Tool (Caregiver Report)

    A 12-item caregiver-report measure assessing youth posttraumatic stress symptoms related to any endorsed psychological trauma exposure. Designed to assist clinicians in evaluating and diagnosing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Caregiver respondents rate the frequency of traumatic stress symptoms in their child over the past month (e.g., "When something reminds my child of what happened, he/she has strong feelings in his/her body, like his/her heart beats fast, headaches or stomach aches") using a 5-point Likert scale. Items are summed to calculate a sum score, ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating higher levels of traumatic stress symptoms, and scores of 21 or greater indicate clinically elevated ("probable PTSD") traumatic stress symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  2. Pediatric Traumatic Stress Screening Tool (Youth Self-Report)

    A 12-item self-report measure assessing posttraumatic stress symptoms related to any endorsed psychological trauma exposure. Designed to assist clinicians in evaluating and diagnosing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Youth respondents rate the frequency of traumatic stress symptoms they have experienced over the past month (e.g., "When something reminds me of what happened, I have strong feelings in my body, like my heart beats fast, headaches or stomach aches") using a 5-point Likert scale. Items are summed to calculate a sum score, ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating higher levels of traumatic stress symptoms, and scores of 21 or greater indicate clinically elevated ("probable PTSD") traumatic stress symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  3. Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale - 25

    The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale -25 is a 25-item youth self-report measure assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms. Respondents rate the frequency with which they experience symptoms (e.g., "I feel sad or empty) using a 4-point Likert scale. Scores on individual items are summed to calculate depression (10 items; scores range from 0 to 30), anxiety (15 items; scores range from 0 to 45), and overall depression and anxiety (25 items; scores range from 0 to 75) sum scores. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. Raw scores can be converted to t-scores using normed data based on child biological sex and age.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  4. The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale - 25, Parent

    The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale - 25, Parent is a 25-item measure assessing caregiver report of youth anxiety and depressive symptoms. Respondents rate the frequency with which their child experiences symptoms (e.g., "My child feels sad or empty) using a 4-point Likert scale. Scores on individual items are summed to calculate depression (10 items; scores range from 0 to 30), anxiety (15 items; scores range from 0 to 45), and overall depression and anxiety (25 items; scores range from 0 to 75) sum scores. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. Raw scores can be converted to t-scores using normed data based on child biological sex and age.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  5. Ohio Scales for Youth Functioning Scale (Caregiver Report)

    The Ohio Scales for Youth Functioning Scale (Caregiver Report) is a 20-item measure assessing caregiver report of youth functional impairment across settings and daily living. Respondents rate the degree of functional impairment children experience across everyday activities (e.g., "Controlling emotions and staying out of trouble"; "Getting along with friends") using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores on individual items are summed to calculate an overall functional impairment score, ranging from 0 to 100, in which lower scores indicate greater functional impairment in everyday activities. Scores at or below 50 are considered clinically elevated functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  6. Ohio Scales for Youth Functioning Scale (Youth Self-Report)

    The Ohio Scales for Youth Functioning Scale (Youth Self-Report) is a 20-item measure assessing self-report of youth functional impairment across settings and daily living. Respondents rate the degree of functional impairment they experience across everyday activities (e.g., "Controlling emotions and staying out of trouble"; "Getting along with friends") using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores on individual items are summed to calculate an overall functional impairment score, ranging from 0 to 100, in which lower scores indicate greater functional impairment in everyday activities. Scores at or below 60 are considered clinically elevated functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Youth Self-Report)

    The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support is a 12-item self-report measure assessing perceived social support from friends, family, and significant others. Respondents rate the degree to which they agree with each statement (e.g., "My family really tries to help me") using a 7-point Likert scale. Mean scores are calculated across three subscales: friend support (4 items; scores range from 1 to 7), family support (4 items; scores range from 1 to 7), and significant other support (4 items; scores range from 1 to 7). An overall social support score is calculated by averaging responses across all 12 items (scores range from 1 to 7). Across all subscale and total scores, higher values indicate higher levels of perceived social support.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

  2. Distress Tolerance Scale Youth Self-Report

    The Distress Tolerance Scale is a 15-item self-report measure assessing individuals' ability to tolerate uncomfortable emotional states, physical sensations, and emotion-related behavioral urges. Respondents rate the extent to which they agree with each statement (e.g., "Feeling upset or distressed is unbearable to me") using a 5-point Likert scale. When used with youth, 12 items are summed to create a total distress tolerance score; 11 of these items are reverse scored, and one item is not. Lower scores indicate greater distress tolerance.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 weeks post-baseline; 24 weeks post-baseline; 36 weeks post-baseline; 48 weeks post-baseline.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005). The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and emotion, 29(2), 83-102.
  • Tonarely NA, Ehrenreich-May J. Confirming the Factor Structure and Validity of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) in Youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Aug;51(4):514-526. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00935-z. PubMed 31637572 ↗
  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52(1), 30-41.
  • Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095. PubMed 2280326 ↗
  • Ogles, B. M., Melendez, G., Davis, D. C., & Lunnen, K. M. (2001). The Ohio scales: Practical outcome assessment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10(2), 199-212.
  • Ebesutani C, Reise SP, Chorpita BF, Ale C, Regan J, Young J, Higa-McMillan C, Weisz JR. The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Version: scale reduction via exploratory bifactor modeling of the broad anxiety factor. Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):833-45. doi: 10.1037/a0027283. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PubMed 22329531 ↗
  • Botchway-Commey E, DPsych CB, Pace C, Ehrenreich-May J, Kennedy SM, Williams J, DPsychClin ZP, DPsychClin AM, Anderson V, Crowe L. A waitlist randomised control trial of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in children and adolescents with chronic medical conditions (The UP-CAM Study): protocol paper. BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;13(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03052-w. PubMed 40770654 ↗
  • Lindenbach, D., Anderson, A., Wang, E., Heintz, M., Rowbotham, M., Ehrenreich-May, J., Arnold, P., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2025). Feasibility and acceptability of implementing a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy for children impacted by trauma within a residential treatment facility. Child & Youth Services, 46(2), 299-324.
  • Ehrenreich-May J, Rosenfield D, Queen AH, Kennedy SM, Remmes CS, Barlow DH. An initial waitlist-controlled trial of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents. J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Mar;46:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 17. PubMed 27771133 ↗
  • Habib, M., Labruna, V., & Newman, J. (2013). Complex histories and complex presentations: Implementation of a manually-guided group treatment for traumatized adolescents. Journal of family violence, 28(7), 717-728.
  • National Child Traumatic Stress Network. (2025). Structured psychotherapy for adolescents responding to chronic stress (SPARCS). https://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/interventions/structured-psychotherapy-for-adolescent-responding-to-chronic-stress-2025.pdf

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data that underlie the study results, along with a data dictionary, will be made available upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to the principal investigator for review. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the aims of the approved proposal. The study team will review requests with the IRB and other relevant data management collaborators at Lurie Children's to obtain institutional approvals and guarantee legal and ethical research and HIPAA compliance. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access and use agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Sep 2029, 35 months later.

Of 546 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Wounds and Injuries, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 599 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 48.

Wounds and Injuries covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 15, 2026
First posted
Mar 19, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 29, 2029
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07483333
Lead sponsor
Anthony Vesco
Collaborators
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Northwestern University
Responsible party
Anthony Vesco (Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry), Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 19, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 29, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Anthony T. Vesco, PhD
Contact
avesco@luriechildrens.org
312-227-5075

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion