CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07478835Updated Sep 15, 2026

VR-Assisted Rehabilitation in Partial Supraspinatus Tears

An interventional study of VR-assisted rehabilitation program and Conventional shoulder exercise program in Partial Supraspinatus Tear and Shoulder Pain, sponsored by Hitit University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Hitit University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of virtual reality-assisted rehabilitation in patients with partial supraspinatus tendon tears. Partial supraspinatus tears are a common cause of shoulder pain, functional limitation, restricted range of motion, and fear of movement. Conservative rehabilitation is commonly used as first-line treatment, while evidence regarding immersive virtual reality rehabilitation in this patient population remains limited.

Participants were randomly allocated to either a virtual reality-assisted rehabilitation group or a conventional rehabilitation group. Both groups received the same physical therapy modalities, including hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The control group subsequently performed conventional therapeutic shoulder exercises, whereas the virtual reality group performed approximately equal-duration immersive VR-based exercises instead of the conventional exercise component. Outcomes included pain, shoulder range of motion, disability, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life, and supraspinatus tendon thickness.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of immersive virtual reality-assisted rehabilitation in patients with partial supraspinatus tendon tears.

Partial supraspinatus tendon tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and functional impairment and may be associated with restricted shoulder range of motion, reduced quality of life, and increased fear of movement. Conservative rehabilitation is commonly used as first-line treatment and typically includes physical therapy modalities together with exercises aimed at restoring shoulder mobility, rotator cuff function, and scapular control.

Virtual reality allows patients to perform repetitive, task-oriented upper-extremity movements within an interactive environment. Such systems may support active participation and provide visual feedback during movement; however, evidence regarding immersive virtual reality rehabilitation specifically in patients with partial supraspinatus tendon tears remains limited.

Participants with MRI-confirmed partial supraspinatus tendon tears were randomly allocated to either a virtual reality-assisted rehabilitation group or a conventional rehabilitation group. Both groups received a standardized physical therapy program consisting of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Following these physical therapy modalities, participants in the control group performed approximately 30 minutes of supervised conventional therapeutic exercises targeting shoulder mobility, stretching, strengthening, and scapular stabilization. Participants in the virtual reality group instead performed approximately 30 minutes of immersive virtual reality-based upper-extremity exercise. Thus, the virtual reality intervention replaced the conventional therapeutic exercise component rather than being added as an additional treatment, and the scheduled exercise duration was approximately equivalent between groups.

The intervention was delivered over 15 sessions during three weeks, with five sessions per week. Evaluations were performed at baseline and after completion of treatment.

The study evaluated pain intensity, passive shoulder range of motion, shoulder pain and disability, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life, and supraspinatus tendon thickness measured by ultrasonography. The aim was to compare immersive virtual reality-based exercise with conventional therapeutic exercise when delivered within an otherwise similar rehabilitation program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Partial Supraspinatus Tear
  • Shoulder Pain

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Kinesiophobia
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Rotator cuff
03

In context

Shoulder Pain

707 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Pain; 152 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 60 across 561 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Pain.

Browse Shoulder Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hitit University is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 to 65 years
  • Shoulder pain persisting for more than four weeks
  • Partial supraspinatus tendon tear confirmed by shoulder magnetic resonance imaging

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physiotherapy treatment within the previous six months
  • Shoulder injection within the previous six months
  • History of tendon repair surgery
  • Communication or cognitive impairment
  • Vertigo, vestibular disorder, or another condition causing balance instability
  • History of epilepsy or seizures
  • Photosensitivity
  • Diagnosed psychiatric condition, including an anxiety disorder or claustrophobia
  • Additional orthopedic condition affecting the same shoulder
  • Neurological, vascular, or cardiac disorder restricting functional capacity
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    virtual reality group

    Participants received the same physical therapy modalities as the control group, consisting of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. They subsequently performed approximately 30 minutes of immersive virtual reality-based upper-extremity exercise using a Meta Quest Pro headset instead of the conventional therapeutic exercise component. The virtual reality exercise was therefore a replacement rather than an additional treatment.

    Behavioral: VR-assisted rehabilitation program

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants received physical therapy modalities consisting of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. They subsequently performed approximately 30 minutes of supervised conventional therapeutic shoulder exercises targeting shoulder mobility, stretching, strengthening, and scapular stabilization.

    Behavioral: Conventional shoulder exercise program

Interventions

  • BehavioralVR-assisted rehabilitation program

    Participants received physical therapy modalities consisting of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. They subsequently performed approximately 30 minutes of immersive virtual reality-based upper-extremity exercise using a Meta Quest Pro headset instead of the conventional therapeutic shoulder exercise component. The virtual reality activities involved repetitive, task-oriented shoulder and upper-extremity movements within an interactive three-dimensional environment. The intervention was delivered five days per week for three weeks, for a total of 15 sessions.

  • BehavioralConventional shoulder exercise program

    After receiving physical therapy modalities consisting of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, participants performed approximately 30 minutes of supervised conventional therapeutic shoulder exercise. The program included scapular mobilization; stretching exercises for shoulder flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation; and strengthening exercises for the shoulder and scapular stabilizer muscles. Exercises were performed in three sets of 10 repetitions. The intervention was delivered five days per week for three weeks, for a total of 15 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Pain intensity at rest and during shoulder movement was assessed separately using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicated greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Passive range of motion (ROM) of the affected shoulder

    Passive range of motion of the affected shoulder, including flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, was measured in degrees using a Saehan goniometer. Higher values indicated greater range of motion.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

  2. Shoulder pain and disability measured using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

    The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index is a 13-item questionnaire comprising a five-item pain subscale and an eight-item disability subscale. Pain, disability, and total scores are expressed on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pain and disability.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

  3. Health-related quality of life measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    The Short Form-36 is a 36-item questionnaire comprising eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

  4. Kinesiophobia measured using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia

    The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item questionnaire scored using a four-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement or reinjury.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

  5. Supraspinatus tendon thickness measured using ultrasonography (USG)

    Supraspinatus tendon thickness was measured with the participant seated and the affected arm placed in the modified Crass position. Using a Logiq V2 portable ultrasound device, the transducer was positioned longitudinally over the supraspinatus tendon, and tendon thickness was measured at the point of maximal thickness and recorded in centimeters. The measurement procedure was based on the EURO-MUSCULUS shoulder scanning protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hitit University Erol Olçok Research Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic
    Çorum, Çorum 19000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional regulations and the absence of participant consent for public data sharing.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07478835
Lead sponsor
Hitit University
Responsible party
Pınar Özge Başaran (Principal Investigator, Hitit University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2025
Completion
Dec 20, 2025
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion