CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07473622ORBIT-1Updated Mar 16, 2026

Outcome Research in Bowel Irrigation Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation and/or Faecal Incontinence

An interventional study of Transanal irrigation in Faecal Incontinence and Chronic Constipation, sponsored by Qufora A/S. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-16.

Sponsored by Qufora A/S · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical investigation is a post-market, exploratory, randomised, parallel, open-label investigation comparing two UKCA/CE-marked transanal irrigation products for the management of faecal incontinence and/or chronic constipation of heterogenous origin. The aim of this investigation is to assess outcomes in a real-world clinical setting, by following the typical clinical routine, with randomisation and more frequent visits/phone calls as the only difference from typical clinical procedure.

During 4-week training period, participants will trained by nurse specialists on how to use the device to which they were randomised to and will be instructed to irrigate once per day. For the remainder of the investigation, participants will be advised to continue irrigation once daily (or a minimum of 3 times a week). Participants will be followed up via phone call or in-person visit up to 52 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Faecal Incontinence
  • Chronic Constipation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Encopresis

35 studies on the registry are indexed under Encopresis; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 66 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Encopresis.

Browse Encopresis studies →

Lead sponsor

Qufora A/S is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Faecal incontinence (FI), chronic constipation (CC) or co-existing FI/CC, all of heterogenous origin
  • Positive Rome IV criteria for functional constipation and/or positive Rome IV criteria for faecal incontinence
  • 18 years or older
  • Ability to understand written and spoken English (due to questionnaire validity)
  • Ability to understand and provide written, informed consent prior to any investigation-specific procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of transanal irrigation
  • Neurogenic bowel dysfunction
  • Low anterior resection syndrome (this group will be excluded due to the possibility of being randomised to a balloon catheter).
  • Previous rectal and/or anal surgery (except minor rectal or anal surgery such as haemorrhoid procedures, anal fissure surgery, drainage of a perianal/rectal abscess, or other rectal or anal surgeries deemed minor by the investigator)
  • Physical disability that affects the ability to independently use the irrigation device
  • Intermittent use of opioids inducing chronic constipation
  • Patulous anus
  • Participation in research conflicting with the current investigation
  • Physical or mental conditions affecting the ability to comply with the clinical investigation plan
  • Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant during the investigation period
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Qufora QNova

    Device: Transanal irrigation

  • Active comparator
    Qufora Irrisedo Klick

    Device: Transanal irrigation

Interventions

  • DeviceTransanal irrigation

    Transanal irrigation by use of irrigation devices

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire (BIQ) 4-point ordinal scale

    Participant experience with device (0: strongly disagree, 4: strongly agree)

    Time frame: Week 4, 10, 26, and 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Diary

    Bowel irrigation frequency (times per week)

    Time frame: Week 10, 26, and 52

  2. Patient Diary

    Bowel irrigation volume (in ml)

    Time frame: Week 10, 26, and 52

  3. Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS)

    Constipation severity (Higher scores indicate worse constipation symptoms; score range: 0-30)

    Time frame: Week 0, 4, 10, 26, and 52

  4. St Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS

    Fecal incontinence severity (Higher scores indicate worse incontinence symptoms; score range: 0-24)

    Time frame: Week 0, 4, 10, 26, and 52

  5. The 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) index score

    General health-related quality of life (measure across five dimensions; higher levels indicate greater health impairment)

    Time frame: Week 0, 4, 10, 26, and 52

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07473622
Lead sponsor
Qufora A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 16, 2026

Study contacts

Haya N.H. Pedersen
Contact
hap@qufora.com
+45 31394941

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion