ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07471139Updated Nov 4, 2026

SWITCH: Apixaban vs Vitamin K in HM3

A Phase 3 interventional study of Warfarin and Apixaban in LVAD (Left Ventricular Assist Device) Thrombosis, Heart Failure and Bleeding, sponsored by Columbia University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
460
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to learn the safety and efficacy of a new anticoagulant therapy with apixaban as compared to warfarin to prevent thrombotic events while protecting from bleeding complications in patients with advanced heart failure who are chronically supported by a HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device for 3 months.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure is a global epidemic, and Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) - particularly the HeartMate 3 (HM3) - are increasingly used due to their survival benefit over medical therapy. Despite advances, hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) like thrombosis and bleeding remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown superiority over warfarin in heart failure patients, with lower rates of embolic and intracranial bleeding. Reduced-dose DOACs also appear to reduce major bleeding without increasing thrombotic risk. However, data on their use in LVAD patients is limited, consisting mainly of case reports, small series, retrospective analyses, and a few small randomized clinical trials.

Some reports suggest apixaban may reduce bleeding in high-risk LVAD patients, though cases of pump thrombosis and stroke have occurred. Early studies comparing DOACs to warfarin in patients with HeartMate II (HMII), HeartWare™ HVAD™ System, and The Abbott HeartMate 3 (HM3) show no significant differences in outcomes, with a trend toward less bleeding with apixaban. Two small randomized clinical trials in HM3 patients (The DOAC LVAD Study and The DOT-HM3 Study) found similar results.

This prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists in HM3 patients more than 3 months post-implant.

02

Conditions studied

  • LVAD (Left Ventricular Assist Device) Thrombosis
  • Heart Failure
  • Bleeding
  • Thrombosis; Artery
  • Stroke
  • Heart Transplant
03

In context

Thrombosis

955 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 171 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 83 across 530 interventional studies indexed under Thrombosis.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants will have HeartMate3 LVAD implanted > 3 months before enrollment
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Treated with WARFARIN SODIUM
  • Participant must provide written prior to any clinical investigation related procedure
  • In female participants of childbearing capability, not currently pregnant and on appropriate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in any other clinical investigation(s) involving a Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) device, or interventional investigation(s) likely to confound study results or affect study outcome
  • Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results
  • Known allergy to Apixaban
  • Bridge to transplant
  • Severe renal dysfunction Estimated (eGFR) \<20
  • History of major bleeding event with subsequent reduction of goal to \< 1.8
  • Apixaban dose reduction criteria (Age ≥80 years, weight ≤60 kg, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL)
  • Aortic root thrombus
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Warfarin

    Participants will take warfarin, dose titrated for an INR \>= 1.8

    Drug: Warfarin

  • Experimental
    Apixaban

    Participants wil take apixaban 5 mg bid

    Drug: Apixaban

Interventions

  • Warfarin dose titrated for an International Normalized Ratio (INR) \>= 1.8

    Also known as: COUMADIN, warfarin sodium

  • Apixaban 5 mg bid (twice a day)

    Also known as: Eliquis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival free of major hemocompatibility related adverse event

    Major Hemocompatibility Related Adverse Event: Stroke, Pump Thrombosis, major non surgical Bleeding (moderate or severe), Arterial Peripheral Thromboembolism. Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-surgical Major Hemorrhagic Events

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Non-surgical Major Thrombotic Events

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Survival

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Stroke Rates

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Pump Thrombosis Rates

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Bleeding Rates

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Rates of listing for Heart Transplant

    Rates will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Patient functional status

    Association between anticoagulant regimen and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification (FC) will be compared between groups. Scores range I through IV, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Patient QOL

    Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) 12 scores will be compared between groups. Scores range 1-100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. LVAD device speed

    LVAD speed (mean, SD) of LVAD will be compared between study groups. Speed ranges 4500-6000 RPM.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. LVAD device flow

    LVAD flow (mean, SD) of LVAD will be compared between study groups. Flow ranges 3-6 L/min.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. LVAD device pulsatility index

    LVAD pulsatility index (PI) will be compared between study groups. PI ranges 1-4 (no units).

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. LVAD device power

    LVAD power (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. Power ranges 3-7 W.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Right atrial pressure

    Right atrial (RA) pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. RA ranges 0-20 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Right ventricular systolic pressure

    Right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. RV systolic pressure ranges 0-100 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Right ventricular diastolic pressure

    Right ventricular (RV) diastolic pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. RV diastolic pressure ranges 0-50 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure

    Pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. PA systolic pressure ranges 0-100 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure

    Pulmonary artery (PA) diastolic pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. PA diastolic pressure ranges 0-50 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Pulmonary artery mean pressure

    Pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure (mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. PA mean pressure ranges 0-50 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure

    Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP, mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. PCWP ranges 0-50 mmHg.

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Cardiac output

    Cardiac output (CO, mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. CO ranges 3-10 L/min.

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Invasive hemodynamics

    Cardiac index (CI, mean, SD) will be compared between study groups. CI ranges 2.5-4 L/min/m\^2.

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Drive line infection rates

    Rate of drive line infections will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. VAD coordinator time

    Means will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Laboratory monitoring

    A quantitative comparison of performed laboratory tests to monitor anticoagulation between groups (counts)

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Days hospitalized

    Means will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Caregiver burden

    Self assessed caregiver burden will be collected using the validated The Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale (OCBS), and compared between study groups. Scores range 15-75, with higher scores indicating higher levels of caregiving burden (more time spent or greater difficulty).

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Time in therapeutic range in the warfarin sodium group

    Means, as well as rates above 70%, will be compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Apixaban levels in patients incurring adverse event

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Netuka I, Tucanova Z, Ivak P, Gregor S, Kolesar DM, Marek T, Melenovsky V, Binova J, Dorazilova Z, Hegarova M, Podolec M, Riha H, Connors JM, Mehra MR. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy With a Fully Magnetically Levitated LVAD: The DOT-HM3 Study. Circulation. 2024 Aug 6;150(6):509-511. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069726. Epub 2024 Apr 9. No abstract available. PubMed 38594972 ↗
  • Shah P, Looby M, Dimond M, Bagchi P, Shah B, Isseh I, Rollins AT, Abdul-Aziz AA, Kennedy J, Tang DG, Klein KM, Casselman S, Vermeulen C, Sheaffer W, Snipes M, Sinha SS, O'Connor CM. Evaluation of the Hemocompatibility of the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Apixaban in Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The DOAC LVAD Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Sep;12(9):1540-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.04.013. Epub 2024 May 7. PubMed 38795110 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2029, 34 months after the start.

Of 27 phase 3 interventional studies under Thrombosis, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 34 months is below that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 4, 2026: start Aug 2026 → Oct 2026 and completion Aug 2029 → Oct 2029.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 24, 2026
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
StartActual
Oct 15, 2026was Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2029
CompletionEst.
Oct 2029was Aug 2029
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 4, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center · New York, United States
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Oct 15, 2026 (actual)
Nov 4, 2026
Study completion
Aug 2029→Oct 2029
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Columbia University Irving Medical Center · New York, United States
    Start date Aug 2026→Oct 15, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Aug 2029→Oct 2029
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07471139
Responsible party
Nir Uriel (Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Professor of Cardiology (in Medicine), Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Ilan Richter, MD
Contact
ir2498@cumc.columbia.edu
3322098345
Nir Uriel, MD
principal investigator · New York Presbyterian / Columbia University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Apixaban

Start the discussion