ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07466797e-IMPACTUpdated Aug 10, 2026

The eHealth Integrated Maternal Physical Activity Programme in Prenatal Care Trial (E-IMPACT)

An interventional study of e-IMPACT programme in Physical Activity and Health Behavior, sponsored by KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Primary conditionHealth BehaviorRegistry: Motor ActivityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Motor Activity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Health Behavior
Why
  1. Motor Activity is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Health Behavior.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by KK Women's and Children's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This will be a proof-of-concept randomised control trial (RCT) study, where 100 pregnant women will be recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy and followed-up until delivery. It aims to test these following hypotheses:

  1. pregnancy is a window of opportunity to implement good lifestyle habits of physical activity and exercise as pregnant women are in regular contact with health professionals and are likely motivated and be more confident to carry out these activities according to the guidelines
  2. this integrated programme will effective in a healthcare setting, and will bring Singapore's "Guidelines on Physical Activity and Exercise in Pregnancy" guidelines to implementation
  3. with enhanced self-efficacy and motivation, the proportion of women engaging in adequate physical activity during pregnancy will increase to meet recommended guidelines.
Read the detailed description

In Singapore, where national initiatives such as Healthier SG aim to promote active lifestyles, nearly one-third of pregnant women are affected by overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m²), increasing health risks for both mother and child. These women are typically less physically active than their lean counterparts, a gap that often widens during pregnancy, leading to excessive gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention that heighten long-term metabolic and cardiovascular risks. Culturally tailored, region-specific strategies are needed to support healthy behaviours during pregnancy. The investigators propose an integrated eHealth prenatal programme offering personalised guidance, credible information, and improved communication with healthcare professionals to overcome existing barriers and promote sustained physical activity-a critical yet under-addressed priority in Asia.

This will be a proof-of-concept randomised control trial (RCT) study, where 100 pregnant overweight/obese women (BMI 23 kg/m2 or above) will be recruited from KK Women's and Children's hospital in the first trimester of pregnancy with consent form completion after meeting the inclusion criteria. After the first baseline visit, all participants will be followed-up in the second and third trimester of the pregnancy.

All participants recruited will be randomised into one of two groups through block-randomization of size 2 to reduce bias and achieve balance in the allocation of participants to intervention arms. All participants will receive standard routine antenatal care, along with an educational leaflet on physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and a wearable tracker. The intervention group will receive the e-IMPACT programme in three parts led by exercise physiologist from the Singapore Sport and Exercise Medicine Centre @ KKH in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy.

This study will evaluate behavioural, psychological, and health-related outcomes among pregnant participants. Physical activity will be objectively measured using a Fitbit tracker to record steps, activity duration, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and energy expenditure, and subjectively using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) to assess self-reported activity, sedentary time, and energy expenditure (MET-min/day). Participants' self-efficacy and motivation to engage in exercise during pregnancy will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention using the Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (P-ESES) and the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of the e-IMPACT programme will be evaluated through a process evaluation guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework, incorporating feedback from both participants and exercise physiologists. Exploratory outcomes will include sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), antenatal anxiety and depression measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and health-related quality of life measured by the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). Gestational weight gain will be determined from medical records, using the first and last recorded gestational weights.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity
  • Health Behavior

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • exercise in pregnancy
  • physical activity in pregnancy
03

In context

Health Behavior Reclassified

967 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Behavior; 165 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 150 across 824 interventional studies indexed under Health Behavior.

Browse Health Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

KK Women's and Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Compared within Health Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Motor Activity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant women (First trimester at least 4 weeks gestation)
  2. Age 21 years and above
  3. 23 kg/m2 and above
  4. Physically fit to participate in moderate intensity exercise
  5. Singleton pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who have severe chronic disease such as chronic kidney disease, hypertension, asthma OR
  2. Obstetric or medical complications which might preclude women in normal levels of physical activity or exercise during pregnancy.
  3. Women who participated in other weight management programmes, or physical activity intervention studies recently (past 6 months) or concurrently
  4. Difficulty in understanding the English language
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    e-IMPACT Group

    Participants will receive standard antenatal care, an educational leaflet on physical activity during pregnancy, and a wearable tracker. Participants will also receive the e-IMPACT programme.

    Behavioral: e-IMPACT programme

  • No intervention
    Standard Care Group

    Participants will receive standard antenatal care, an educational leaflet on physical activity during pregnancy, and a wearable tracker.

Interventions

  • Behaviorale-IMPACT programme

    a three-part prenatal physical activity intervention delivered across all trimesters. It includes telehealth one-on-one consultations using Motivational Interviewing and SMART goal-setting, wearable trackers for self-monitoring, and guideline-based educational content via pre-recorded digital videos.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of meeting physical activity guidelines at 12 weeks from baseline (between 19 to 23 weeks gestational age)

    Objective measures of steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and activity duration and energy expenditure (AEE) will be assessed using an activity tracker to capture physical activity engagement, sedentary time and energy expenditure (MET-min/day).

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline (between 19 to 23 weeks gestational age)

  2. Assessment of meeting physical activity guidelines at 24 weeks from baseline (from 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Objective measures of steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and activity duration and energy expenditure (AEE) will be assessed using an activity tracker to capture physical activity engagement, sedentary time and energy expenditure (MET-min/day).

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline (from 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of the study programme at 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Survey for only participants in the intervention group.

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

Other outcomes

  1. Assess participants' self-efficacy beliefs related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at baseline (between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

    Using the validated Pregnancy Exercise Self- Efficacy Scale. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy.

    Time frame: At baseline ( between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

  2. Assess participants' self-efficacy beliefs related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

    Using the validated Pregnancy Exercise Self- Efficacy Scale. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

  3. Assess participants' self-efficacy beliefs related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Using the validated Pregnancy Exercise Self- Efficacy Scale. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy.

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

  4. Assess participants' self- motivation related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at baseline (between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

    Using validated Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Scores range from 0 to 4 for each subscale, with higher scores reflecting stronger endorsement of that type of exercise motivation.

    Time frame: At baseline ( between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

  5. Assess participants' self- motivation related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

    Using validated Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Scores range from 0 to 4 for each subscale, with higher scores reflecting stronger endorsement of that type of exercise motivation.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

  6. Assess participants' self- motivation related to engaging in exercise during pregnancy at 24 weeks from baseline ( between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Using validated Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Scores range from 0 to 4 for each subscale, with higher scores reflecting stronger endorsement of that type of exercise motivation.

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline ( between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

  7. Assessing sleep quality at baseline ( between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

    Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Questionnaire. Global scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality; scores greater than 5 suggest poor sleep.

    Time frame: At baseline (between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

  8. Assessing sleep quality at 12 weeks from baseline (between 19 to 23 weeks gestation)

    Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Questionnaire. Global scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality; scores greater than 5 suggest poor sleep.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline (between 19 to 23 weeks gestation)

  9. Assessing sleep quality at 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Questionnaire. Global scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality; scores greater than 5 suggest poor sleep.

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

  10. Assessing mental health at 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

    Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity; scores ≥13 suggest probable depression.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline ( between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

  11. Assessing quality of life at baseline (between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

    Using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-rated health.

    Time frame: At baseline (between 7 to 11 weeks gestation)

  12. Assessing quality of life at 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

    Using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-rated health.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline (between19 to 23 weeks gestation)

  13. Assessing quality of life at 24 weeks from baseline ( between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

    Using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-rated health.

    Time frame: At 24 weeks from baseline (between 31 to 35 weeks gestation)

  14. Assessing gestational weight gain

    Gestational weight at baseline will be recorded and subtracted from final gestational weight before delivery from medical records

    Time frame: At baseline and at delivery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tan YR, Tan KH, Dai F, Tan HK, Tan LK. Attitudes and practices of exercise among pregnant mothers in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2024 Sep 1;65(9):488-493. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-247. Epub 2023 Jan 6. PubMed 36695278 ↗
  • Padmapriya N, Shen L, Soh SE, Shen Z, Kwek K, Godfrey KM, Gluckman PD, Chong YS, Saw SM, Muller-Riemenschneider F. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Patterns Before and During Pregnancy in a Multi-ethnic Sample of Asian Women in Singapore. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Nov;19(11):2523-35. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1773-3. PubMed 26140834 ↗
  • He S, Allen JC, Razali NS, Chern BSM, Tan KH. Association between gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in a Singaporean population: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.031. Epub 2022 Mar 17. PubMed 35325689 ↗
  • He S, Allen JC, Razali NS, Win NM, Zhang JJ, Ng MJ, Yeo GSH, Chern BSM, Tan KH. Are women in Singapore gaining weight appropriately during pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2443-z. PubMed 31409285 ↗
  • Chan CWH, Au Yeung E, Law BMH. Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions on Pregnancy-Related Outcomes among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 23;16(10):1840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101840. PubMed 31126153 ↗
  • Sharp KJ, Sherar LB, Kettle VE, Sanders JP, Daley AJ. Effectiveness of interventions to increase device-measured physical activity in pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Dec 1;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01379-w. PubMed 36457104 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of the dataset, which involves pregnant participants and potentially identifiable health and obstetric information. Although all data will be de-identified, there remains a risk of participant re-identification given the small sample size and the unique combination of demographic and pregnancy-related variables. Furthermore, consent for open data sharing was not obtained from participants, and sharing IPD beyond the study team would therefore not comply with the approved ethics protocol. Aggregated results and summary statistics will be shared through publications and conference presentations, in accordance with ethical approval and data protection regulations.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2028, 29 months after the start.

Of 567 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Health Behavior, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 585 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 1, 2026
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
StartActual
Mar 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07466797
Responsible party
Elaine Quah (Assistant professor, KK Women's and Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
Start date
Mar 9, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Quah Phaik Ling Quah, PhD
Contact
quah.phaik.ling@kkh.com.sg
+6597732543
Kok Hian Tan, M.D.
Contact
tan.kok.hian@singhealth.com.sg
+65 6394 1099

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion