ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07464847PC400Updated Mar 11, 2026

PC400 Coils for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

An observational study in Intracranial Aneurysms and Saccular Aneurysm, sponsored by Semmes-Murphey Foundation. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-11.

Sponsored by Semmes-Murphey Foundation · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective, observational study is to evaluate the long-term occlusion rates and safety of the Penumbra PC400 coil in the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms in adult subjects ages 18-80.

Specifically, the study aims to analyze rate of death, stroke, neurological death, or rebleeding associated with the treatment of intracranial aneurysm with the PC400 coil.

Participants will undergo standard of care treatment and follow up for their aneurysm treatment, and participating sites will collect procedural and follow up data.

Read the detailed description

Endovascular treatment has become the primary approach for intracranial aneurysms, offering improved safety and reduced recanalization rates. Despite advancements in flow diversion and intrasaccular devices, coiling remains a cornerstone therapy. However, aneurysmal recurrence due to regrowth or coil compaction continues to be a significant concern, with recurrence observed in about 20% of cases, leading to potential rebleeding and treatment challenges.

The Penumbra PC400 coil (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) addresses these concerns by offering 400% more volume per unit length than traditional 0.010-inch coils. This design also reduces procedure and fluoroscopy times, improving overall efficiency. Several retrospective reports have highlighted its advantages in packing density, procedure time, and cost-effectiveness.1,2,3 However, there is a lack of high-level prospective data to support these findings.

The goal of the present study is to determine occlusion rates and safety when Penumbra PC400 coils are used in the treatment of ruptured or unruptured medium and large sized (5mm or more) intracranial aneurysms.

Up to 100 patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years presenting with ruptured or unruptured saccular aneurysms who meet all eligibility criteria will be enrolled. Enrolled subjects must be treated with Penumbra PC400 coils used in any combination comprising a minimum of 80% total coil length used.

The primary safety endpoint is procedure- or disease-related death or major stroke within 30 days of treatment or major ipsilateral stroke, neurological death or rebleeding from the target aneurysm during the 18-month follow-up period. The primary efficacy endpoint is Adequate angiographic occlusion at 18 ± 6 months without interim retreatment secondary to aneurysm recurrence or rebleed of the target aneurysm. This will be assessed by an imaging core lab using digital subtraction angiograms (DSA).

Secondary endpoints include Clinical outcome (mRS) at 30 days, clinical outcome (mRS) at 18 months, packing density as measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm immediately post-procedure, mean number of coils, procedural duration (in minutes), retreatment rate due to recurrence at 18 months, adequate angiographic occlusion at 18 without rebleed of the target aneurysm, occlusion stability at 18 months, peri-/post-procedural adverse events related to the device and/or the procedure.

Data will be shared with the coordinating center, Semmes Murphey Foundation, via a secure electronic database, REDCap. Access to the REDCap database will only be granted to IRB approved research personnel from participating sites. Subjects will be given a subject ID in the database. Throughout the data collection period, investigators may maintain a linking key that links the subject to their ID. This linking key will only be accessible to the investigator and site personnel. Once data collection has been completed, the linking key will be erased so that there will be no way to re-link subjects with their research data. Research data from each site will only be accessible to the approved research personnel at that site; authorized research personnel from the coordinating center will only have access to the coded data in the REDCap database for each site for study monitoring purposes. No patient contact will occur outside of standard of care procedures. Participating sites will execute a Data Use Agreement (DUA) with the coordinating center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Saccular Aneurysm

Keywords

  • Intracranial aneurysm
  • Coiling
03

In context

Intracranial Aneurysm

418 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 191 observational studies indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm.

Browse Intracranial Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

Semmes-Murphey Foundation is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All eligible subjects presenting to a participating study site will be considered for enrollment. Up to 100 patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years presenting with ruptured or unruptured saccular aneurysms who meet all eligibility criteria will be enrolled. Enrolled subjects must be treated with Penumbra PC400 coils used in any combination comprising a minimum of 80% total coil length used.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age.
  • Subject has a previously untreated, ruptured or unruptured, saccular intracranial aneurysm 5mm or more in diameter for which the clinical decision to treat with Penumbra PC400 embolization coils has been made independent of the decision to enroll the subject in the study described in this protocol.
  • The decision to undergo the coiling procedure is made independently of and prior to participation in the research.
  • Subject has a baseline Hunt and Hess Score of I, II, or III.
  • Subject must be considered by the treating physician to be available for and able to complete all follow-up visits.
  • Subject has not been previously entered into this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is \< 18 or > 80 years of age.
  • Subject has a baseline Hunt and Hess score of IV or V.
  • Target aneurysm is dissecting, fusiform, blister-like, mycotic, tumoral, or AVM related.
  • Target aneurysm maximum diameter is \<5mm
  • Target aneurysm was previously treated via clipping or coiling.
  • Target aneurysm is deemed by the treating physician to be unsuitable for coiling or unlikely to be successfully treated by endovascular techniques.
  • Target aneurysm has not been confidently determined by the treating physician to be the source of SAH.
  • Planned use of a flow diverter (Surpass, Pipeline, Silk, FRED, p64, etc.) or intrasaccular device (WEB, Artis, Medina, etc.) as a component of the target aneurysm treatment plan.
  • Intended use of a coil-assist stent as a component of the target aneurysm treatment plan, unless stent is used for bailout purposes.
  • Subject has a known, untreatable to contrast dye, iodine, hydrogel, or any other component of the treatment device.
  • Subject has a to heparin or aspirin.
  • Subject has vascular anatomy/tortuosity preventing access to the target aneurysm.
  • Subject is unable to undergo DSA or DSA is determined unsuitable or outside standard of care by the treating physician.
  • Subject has a serious or life-threatening comorbidity that could confound study results.
  • Subject is at high risk of noncompliance due to a history of substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.
  • Subject is unable to complete scheduled follow-up assessments due to comorbidities, geographical limitations, or a of less than 18 months.
  • Subject is pregnant, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant prior to completion of follow-up.
  • Subject is enrolled in another device or drug study in which participation could confound study results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
18 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Procedure- or disease-related death or major stroke

    Procedure- or disease-related death or major stroke within 30 days of treatment

    Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

  2. Stroke, neurological death, or rebleeding from target aneurysm

    Major ipsilateral stroke, neurological death or rebleeding from the target aneurysm during the 18-month follow-up period

    Time frame: 18 months post procedure

  3. Adequate angiographic occlusion

    Adequate angiographic occlusion at 18 ± 6 months without interim retreatment secondary to aneurysm recurrence or rebleed of the target aneurysm. This will be assessed by the core lab using digital subtraction angiograms (DSA).

    Time frame: 18 months post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-day Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Clinical outcome (mRS) at 30 days (20 - 60 days). Scores range from 0-6, zero = no symptoms, six = dead.

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

  2. 18-month Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Clinical outcome (mRS) at 18 ± 6 months. Scores range from 0-6, zero = no symptoms, six = dead.

    Time frame: 18 months post-procedure

  3. Packing density

    Packing density as measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm immediately post-procedure

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure

  4. Retreatment rate due to recurrence

    Retreatment rate due to recurrence at 18 months

    Time frame: 18 months post-procedure

  5. Angiographic occlusion at 18 months

    Adequate angiographic occlusion at 18 ± 6 months without rebleed of the target aneurysm (regardless of retreatment status)

    Time frame: 18 months post-procedure

  6. Occlusion stability at 18 months

    Occlusion stability at 18 ± 6 months (same, better, or worse compared to posttreatment results)

    Time frame: 18 months post-procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Procedural duration

    Procedural duration (minutes)

    Time frame: Procedural

  2. Number of coils

    Mean number of coils

    Time frame: Procedural

  3. Adverse events related to the coils/coiling procedure

    Peri-/post-procedural adverse events related to the device and/or the procedure

    Time frame: Up to 18 months following the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mascitelli JR, Polykarpou MF, Patel AA, Kamath AA, Moyle H, Patel AB. Initial experience with Penumbra Coil 400 versus standard coils in embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov;5(6):573-6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010483. Epub 2012 Sep 19. PubMed 22993243 ↗
  • Berge J, Gariel F, Marnat G, Dousset V. PC400 volumetric coils minimize radiation, reduce procedure time and optimize packing density during endovascular treatment in medium sized cerebral aneurysms. J Neuroradiol. 2016 Feb;43(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Dec 11. PubMed 26687722 ↗
  • Kulcsar Z, Wanke I, Rufenacht D, Wetzel SG, Goricke S, Kolia K, Quarfordt S, Calvert J, Hawk H, Baxter B. Safety and effectiveness of large volume coils in the treatment of small aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Dec;8(12):1260-1263. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012100. Epub 2016 Jan 20. PubMed 26790826 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD to be shared will include all IPD that underlie results of the publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: The IPD will be available following study completion estimated to be in 2029 with no set end date.

Access criteria: A designated biostatistician will access study IPD. Access will be established through secure electronic transfer. Following publication, results and supporting information will be established on the ClinicalTrials.gov website.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Nov 2029, 42 months later.

Of 67 non-industry observational studies under Intracranial Aneurysm, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 145. This study's planned 42 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 104 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 145.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2026
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
StartEst.
May 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Mar 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07464847
Lead sponsor
Semmes-Murphey Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 11, 2026

Study contacts

Nitin Goyal
Contact
ngoyal@semmes-murphey.com
901-522-7700
Olivia House
Contact
ohouse@semmes-murphey.com
901-522-7785
Nitin Goyal, MD
principal investigator · Semmes Murphey Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion