ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07456007Updated Jun 22, 2026

Right Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Water Exchange Versus Air Insufflation in Colonoscopy.

An interventional study of Right colon water exchange and Air nsufflation in Right Colon Adenoma Detectation Rate and Water Exchange Colonoscopy, sponsored by Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2020, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
414
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although colonoscopy is currently regarded as the gold standard to detect and prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) but post-colonoscopy CRCs (interval cancer, IC) still occur. Recent studies demonstrated that protection by colonoscopy against right-sided colon cancer was lower than that attained in the left colon. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been correlated with IC - each 1 % increase in ADR is associated with 3% decrease in the risk of ICs. Hopefully, innovations that improve right colon ADR would reduce the right colon IC. Insertion water exchange (WE), characterized by infusing water to guide the advance of the colonoscope in an airless lumen with its removal mainly during insertion. WE has been shown to improve the overall and right colon ADR compared to traditional air insufflation (Air). Several plausible causes have been proposed to explain the enhanced ADR by WE, including decreased multitasking related distraction, improved bowel cleanness, and flat polyps appearing less flatten and floating up in water Therefore, the adoption of WE in the right colon might be especially beneficial. In addition, WE has been criticized for prolonged insertion time, about 3-5 minutes longer than Air to reach the cecum and required a learning curve of about 50 to 100 cases.In this study, we devise a right colon WE method (RCWE), in which Air will be used to intubate to the hepatic flexure, followed by WE in the right colon. We test the hypothesis that RCWE would increase the right colon ADR without prolonging the insertion time. Consecutive patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic examinations performed by participating endoscopists will be stratified for enrollment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (n=207 per group) to either the AI or RCWE group. Demographic data (age, gender, height, and weight), indications for colonoscopy, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, constipation and chronic use of laxatives will be ascertained before colonoscopy. Quality of bowel preparation, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total procedure time, use of abdominal compression, need for change of position, presence and location of polyps and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy will be recorded. In addition, the right colon (from the hepatic flexure to cecum) insertion time and withdrawal time and infused and suction water amount will be recorded separately.

02

Conditions studied

  • Right Colon Adenoma Detectation Rate
  • Water Exchange Colonoscopy

Keywords

  • water exchange colonoscopy
  • Right colon adenoma detection rate
  • colonoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 40 to 80 years.
  • Patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy.
  • Colonoscopy performed by participating endoscopists.
  • Ability to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide .
  • Age \< 40 years or > 80 years.
  • History of colorectal surgery (e.g., partial colectomy).
  • Known or suspected colorectal cancer.
  • Known inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).
  • Planned therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., polypectomy).
  • Inadequate bowel preparation.
  • Known or suspected colonic obstruction or severe stricture.
  • Massive ascites.
  • Severe comorbid conditions (e.g., renal failure).
  • Emergency colonoscopy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
414 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Right colon water exchange group

    Air insufflation was used to advance the colonoscope to the hepatic flexure, where the insertion method was switched to water exchange (WE) to reach the cecum. This predefined transition was designed to specifically evaluate the effect of WE on right-sided colon adenoma detection.

    Behavioral: Right colon water exchange

  • Active comparator
    Air insufflation group

    Cecal intubation was achieved using conventional air insufflation.

    Behavioral: Air nsufflation

Interventions

  • BehavioralRight colon water exchange

    Air insufflation was used to advance the colonoscope to the hepatic flexure, where the insertion method was switched to water exchange (WE) to reach the cecum. This predefined transition was designed to specifically evaluate the effect of WE on right-sided colon adenoma detection.Air insufflation was applied during withdrawal in both groups.

  • BehavioralAir nsufflation

    Behavioral: Air nsufflationAir was used to minimally distend the lumen during insertion. Water (30-50 mL aliquots) was delivered via syringe as needed to clear residual stool. Carbon dioxide was not used, as it is not standard practice for colonoscopy in Taiwan. Air insufflation was applied during withdrawal in both groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. adenoma detection rate in proximal colon

    The proportion of patients with the presence of adenoma in the proximal colon.

    Time frame: one week

Secondary outcomes

  1. adenoma detection rate

    Time frame: one week

Other outcomes

  1. Insertion time

    Right colon insertion time

    Time frame: During the procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
    Chiayi City, Chiayi 62247, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10. PubMed 19136102 ↗
  • Kudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Sung JJ, Feld AD, Inadomi JM, O'Brien MJ, Lieberman DA, Ransohoff DF, Soetikno RM, Triadafilopoulos G, Zauber A, Teixeira CR, Rey JF, Jaramillo E, Rubio CA, Van Gossum A, Jung M, Vieth M, Jass JR, Hurlstone PD. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4 Suppl):S3-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052. No abstract available. PubMed 18805238 ↗
  • The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available. PubMed 14652541 ↗
  • Ramirez FC, Leung FW. The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):97-101. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18507. Epub 2011 Jul 1. PubMed 22163078 ↗
  • Fischer LS, Lumsden A, Leung FW. Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):128-132. doi: 10.4161/jig.23734. Epub 2012 Jul 1. PubMed 23805393 ↗
  • Hsieh YH, Koo M, Tseng CW, Yang HW, Leung FW. Reduction of multitasking distractions underlies the higher adenoma detection rate of water exchange compared to air insufflation - blinded analysis of withdrawal phase videos. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):230-238. doi: 10.1177/2050640618817105. Epub 2018 Dec 5. PubMed 31080608 ↗
  • Fuccio L, Frazzoni L, Hassan C, La Marca M, Paci V, Smania V, De Bortoli N, Bazzoli F, Repici A, Rex D, Cadoni S. Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):589-597.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jul 5. PubMed 29981753 ↗
  • Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3. PubMed 24890443 ↗
  • Jia H, Pan Y, Guo X, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang L, Dong T, Luo H, Ge Z, Liu J, Hao J, Yao P, Zhang Y, Ren H, Zhou W, Guo Y, Zhang W, Chen X, Sun D, Yang X, Kang X, Liu N, Liu Z, Leung F, Wu K, Fan D. Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6. PubMed 27922025 ↗
  • Hsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15. PubMed 27988288 ↗
  • Cadoni S, Falt P, Rondonotti E, Radaelli F, Fojtik P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Amato A, Paggi S, Smajstrla V, Urban O, Erriu M, Koo M, Leung FW. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2017 May;49(5):456-467. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101229. Epub 2017 Mar 10. PubMed 28282689 ↗
  • Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086. PubMed 24693890 ↗
  • Rondagh EJ, Bouwens MW, Riedl RG, Winkens B, de Ridder R, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno RM, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Apr 5. PubMed 22482917 ↗
  • Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, Genta RM, Rockey DC, Lash R. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;10(12):1395-1401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24. PubMed 22835574 ↗
  • Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, Inamura K, Kim SA, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Ogino S, Chan AT. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1095-105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301969. PubMed 24047059 ↗
  • Doubeni CA, Weinmann S, Adams K, Kamineni A, Buist DS, Ash AS, Rutter CM, Doria-Rose VP, Corley DA, Greenlee RT, Chubak J, Williams A, Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Johnson E, Webster J, Richert-Boe K, Levin TR, Fletcher RH, Weiss NS. Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):312-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00003. PubMed 23460054 ↗
  • Baxter NN, Warren JL, Barrett MJ, Stukel TA, Doria-Rose VP. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2664-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.4772. Epub 2012 Jun 11. PubMed 22689809 ↗
  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701. PubMed 8247072 ↗
  • Dekker E, Rex DK. Advances in CRC Prevention: Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(7):1970-1984. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.069. Epub 2018 Feb 15. PubMed 29454795 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07456007
Lead sponsor
Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Start date
Jun 9, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Jan 30, 2026
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion