CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07452120Updated Apr 2, 2026

DIPB vs. SIFIB for Postoperative Analgesia After Hip Surgery

An interventional study of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Deep Iliacus Plane Block in Hip Arthroplasty, Postoperative Pain and Regional Anesthesia, sponsored by Sivas Numune Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by Sivas Numune Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) and the Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB) for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Effective analgesia after hip surgery is essential for early mobilization, reduction of complications, and improved recovery outcomes.

Seventy patients scheduled for elective hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive either DIPB or SIFIB at the end of surgery. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, motor block, and block-related complications will be evaluated over a 48-hour period.

The study aims to determine whether DIPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with reduced motor blockade compared to SIFIB, thereby contributing to safer and more comprehensive postoperative pain management in hip surgery patients.

Read the detailed description

Hip arthroplasty is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, which may negatively affect early mobilization, rehabilitation, and overall recovery. Adequate postoperative analgesia is therefore essential to reduce complications such as pulmonary morbidity, thromboembolism, delirium, and prolonged hospital stay.

The hip joint is innervated by both deep articular branches (femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves) and superficial cutaneous branches (femoral nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve). An optimal regional analgesic technique should provide effective blockade of both components. However, currently used techniques often fail to adequately block deep capsular innervation while preserving motor function.

The suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) is widely used in hip surgery and effectively blocks the femoral nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, providing reliable cutaneous analgesia. Nevertheless, insufficient spread to obturator and accessory obturator nerves may result in inadequate deep joint analgesia. Attempts to overcome this limitation using high-volume injections may increase the risk of quadriceps weakness and motor blockade.

The Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) is a recently described fascial plane block targeting the deep surface of the iliacus muscle at the level of the anterior inferior iliac spine. Anatomical and preliminary clinical findings suggest that DIPB allows spread of local anesthetic to femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and pericapsular articular branches of the hip joint, potentially providing both capsular and cutaneous analgesia with reduced motor impairment. DIPB has therefore been proposed as a hybrid technique combining advantages of existing regional blocks.

This prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial will be conducted at Sivas Numune Hospital. Seventy patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia will be enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: the SIFIB group (n=35) and the DIPB group (n=35). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence.

All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal systemic analgesia. At the end of surgery, ultrasound-guided SIFIB or DIPB will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist using 0.25% bupivacaine (30-40 mL, weight-adjusted). Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during movement at predetermined intervals up to 48 hours. Rescue analgesia with intravenous tramadol will be administered when NRS ≥4, and total opioid consumption will be recorded. Motor blockade will be evaluated using the modified Bromage scale. Block-related complications and adverse events will also be documented.

The primary aim of the study is to compare postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption between DIPB and SIFIB. Secondary outcomes include motor blockade, block-related complications, and overall analgesic effectiveness. The findings of this study are expected to clarify whether DIPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with less motor impairment, thereby contributing to safer and more comprehensive postoperative pain management in hip arthroplasty patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Acute Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Deep Iliacus Plane Block
  • Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block
  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Regional Anesthesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sivas Numune Hospital as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥18 years
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional anesthesia
  • Infection at the block application site
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Pre-existing significant neurological or motor deficits in the lower extremities
  • Cognitive impairment preventing pain assessment
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB)

    Participants randomized to this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (30-40 mL, weight-adjusted) for postoperative analgesia following primary total hip arthroplasty.

    Procedure: Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block

  • Experimental
    Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB)

    Participants randomized to this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided deep iliacus plane block at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (30-40 mL, weight-adjusted) for postoperative analgesia following primary total hip arthroplasty.

    Procedure: Deep Iliacus Plane Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureSuprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block

    Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block performed at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (30-40 mL, weight-adjusted) for postoperative analgesia following primary total hip arthroplasty.

  • ProcedureDeep Iliacus Plane Block

    Ultrasound-guided deep iliacus plane block performed at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (30-40 mL, weight-adjusted) for postoperative analgesia following primary total hip arthroplasty.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    Postoperative pain assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) at rest and during movement following total hip arthroplasty.

    Time frame: 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid consumption

    Total rescue opioid consumption (intravenous tramadol) administered for postoperative pain management.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to 48 hours postoperatively

  2. Motor block

    Motor blockade assessed using the Modified Bromage Scale (0-3), where higher scores indicate greater motor impairment of the lower extremity following regional anesthesia.

    Time frame: 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively

  3. Pain during movement

    Pain during movement assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Sivas Numune Hospital
    Sivas, Sivas 58050, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Not yet recruiting
  • Sivas Numune Hospital
    Sivas, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Koyuncu B, Ahiskalioglu A, Alver S, Bilal B, Sakul BU, Otu E, Narayanan M, Alici HA. Ultrasound-guided Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB): Cadaveric Evaluation and Pilot Retrospective Evaluation of Another Novel Fascial Plane Block for Hip Analgesia. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2026 Feb 9;54(1):55-61. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2025.252252. Epub 2026 Jan 7. PubMed 41498358 ↗
  • Sekhon J, Jain R, Bansal K, Luthra N, Singh MR, Kumari B. Efficacy of Different Volumes of 0.2% Ropivacaine in Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Multimodal Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgery. Cureus. 2023 Oct 12;15(10):e46894. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46894. eCollection 2023 Oct. PubMed 37954742 ↗
  • Lee S, Hwang JM, Lee S, Eom H, Oh C, Chung W, Ko YK, Lee W, Hong B, Hwang DS. Implementation of the Obturator Nerve Block into a Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Based Analgesia Protocol for Hip Arthroscopy: Retrospective Pre-Post Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Mar 27;56(4):150. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040150. PubMed 32230895 ↗
  • Saeaeh L, Chalacheewa T, Lerdwimonsak C, Phurikamonarunothai S. Comparison between combined suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with intra-articular bupivacaine and suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block in total hip arthroplasty: randomized double blinded controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 29;25(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03345-y. PubMed 41023795 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07452120
Lead sponsor
Sivas Numune Hospital
Responsible party
Fatih Balcı (Specialist physician, Sivas Numune Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Start date
Mar 27, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Study contacts

Fatih Balcı, MD
Contact
fatihbalci05@gmail.com
+90 545 864 76 57
Fatih BALCI
principal investigator · Sivas Numune Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion