A Phase 3 interventional study of Vitamin D (Cholecalciferol ) and Placebo in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), sponsored by Tufts Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.
Sponsored by Tufts Medical Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Other
This study tests whether taking a weekly dose of vitamin D, with the dose adjusted to reach a target blood vitamin D level, can help control blood sugar levels in adults at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes (prediabetes).
Research suggests that vitamin D may play a role in blood sugar control. The goal of this study is to see whether adjusting the dose of vitamin D to reach a specific blood vitamin D level improves blood sugar control compared with a placebo (a look-alike pill without vitamin D).
One hundred adults aged 30 to 74 with prediabetes will take part. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance) to receive either weekly vitamin D supplements or a placebo. Neither the participants nor the research team will know which group a participant is in during the study.
Participants in the vitamin D group will start with one specific dose. After three months, a blood test will be used to decide whether the dose should stay the same or be increased to reach the target vitamin D level. Participants in the placebo group will continue taking the placebo each week.
All participants will be followed for about 18 months. During the study, they will attend scheduled study visits, have blood tests, and wear a continuous glucose monitor, a small device that measures blood sugar levels throughout the day and night. The research team will also make periodic phone calls to check on health changes, medication use, and study participation.
The main outcome of the study is the proportion of time that the participants' blood sugar levels remains in a healthy range.
High-risk prediabetes ("at high risk for type 2 diabetes") defined by meeting the following 2 prediabetes criteria established by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) in the 2010 clinical practice guidelines:
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of tanning devices within 12 weeks of the baseline visit and unwilling to stop use of tanning devices for the duration of the study.
Medications and Supplements
History of intolerance to vitamin D supplements, allergic to any content of the study drug or unwilling to take vitamin D supplements (e.g., someone who eats a vegan diet and would object to the cholecalciferol ingredient which is produced from cholesterol extracted from sheep wool harvested from healthy living sheep).
Other Medical History
Poor venous access.
Laboratory Evaluation
Baseline serum 25(OH)D level greater than 100 ng/mL.
Other
Any other reason that in the opinion of the site investigator would interfere with the study objectives, impede adherence with study procedures or hinder completion of the study or increase risk.
Women only
Use of oral contraceptives or menopausal hormone therapy started within 3 months of baseline. .
Continuous Glucose Monitoring specific
Participants will receive oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) once weekly throughout the study.
Drug: Vitamin D (Cholecalciferol )
Participants in this arm will receive an oral placebo taken once weekly throughout the study.
Drug: Placebo
Vitamin D (cholecalciferol) will be administered orally once weekly for approximately 18 months. The vitamin D will be provided in liquid form in an ampule. Participants in the intervention group will begin with a dose of 25,000 IU per week. A blood vitamin D level will be measured at 3 months, and the dose will be increased to 50,000 IU per week for participants whose results are below the study target.
Placebo will be administered orally once weekly for approximately 18 months. The placebo will be provided in an ampule and will be matched in appearance, dosing schedule, and duration to the active study medication.
Time-in-normoglycemia 140
The cumulative proportion of time that a participant's glucose level is below 140 mg/dL at each CGM measurement period.
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Time-In-Normoglycemia 126
The cumulative proportion of time that a participant's glucose level is below 126 mg/dL at each CGM measurement period.
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Mean glycemia (mg/dL)
The average glucose level at each CGM measurement period.
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months
Glycemic variability
Glycemic variability will be assessed using the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions at each CGM measurement period.
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months
Hemoglobin A1c (%)
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk, assessed by the PREVENT risk calculator. The calculator requires a lipid profile and a urine albumin creatinine ratio. Higher PREVENT values generally indicate higher estimated cardiovascular risk.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, month 12 and month 18
Hypercalcemia
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Hypercalciuria
Time frame: Assessed every 6 months from enrollment to the end of the study at 18 months.
Insulin resistance
Insulin resistance by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Higher HOMA-IR values generally indicate greater estimated insulin resistance.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 12 months, and 18 months.
Insulin secretion
Insulin secretion by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-beta). Higher HOMA beta values generally indicate greater estimated pancreatic β-cell insulin secretion.
Time frame: Assessed from enrollment to the end of study at 18 months.
Plan to share: Yes — Consistent with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) policy, we will make de-identified individual participant data available, following publication, upon reasonable request to qualified investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to a data use agreement to protect participant confidentiality. A data dictionary (a description of the variables collected for each individual) will be provided so that the data can be fully interpreted.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tufts Medical Center