CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07445789SMART-VERAPAFUpdated Mar 27, 2026

SMART-VERAPAF: Self-MAnagement and Random Therapy With VERApamil or Metoprolol in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Verapamil 240 mg slow-release tablet and metoprolol 100 mg slow-release tablet in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), sponsored by Martini Hospital Groningen. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by Martini Hospital Groningen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
436
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The SMART-VERAPAF study investigates the effects of different heart rate-lowering medications in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). This heart rhythm disorder is associated with a large number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for cardioversions and ablations. In this study, patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF are randomized to treatment with heart rate reduction using verapamil or metoprolol, both licensed for this indication. In addition, in a subset of patients, the effect of centrally guided self-care using smartwatch data will be evaluated.

The hypothesis is that both verapamil and guided self-care will lead to better heart rate control and fewer cardioversions and pulmonary vein ablations in patients with paroxysmal AF. This will also result in fewer hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and costs, as well as improved quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Rationale

In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), heart rate-suppressing therapy is used to reduce symptoms and prevent heart failure. However, recent studies show that more than 30% of paroxysmal AF patients experience inappropriate high heart rates for over 50% of the time while in AF. Most patients are treated with beta-blockers for adequate rate control, while less than 5% are treated with verapamil.

Hypothesis and objectives

The investigators hypothesize that treatment with verapamil is superior for heart rate suppression in patients with paroxysmal AF, because dose titration is not hampered by sinus bradycardia outside AF episodes. This advantage is expected to lead to less clinical progression of AF and therefore fewer AF-related hospital admissions, fewer cardioversions, and fewer referrals for ablation. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that guided self-management using smartwatch data improves the quality of heart rate suppression, resulting in fewer symptoms, fewer unplanned hospital admissions, fewer cardioversions, and fewer referrals for ablation.

Main trial endpoints

The primary outcome measure is the time to hospitalization for AF, cardioversion, or referral for pulmonary vein ablation during at least 1 year follow-up after randomization.

Secondary trial endpoints

Secondary outcome measures include hospitalizations for heart failure, the number of AF-related hospital days, outpatient visits for AF, echocardiographic parameters, heart rate and blood pressure, quality of life, symptoms, activity level, and costs.

Trial design

This is a multicenter, prospective, double-blind randomized study with blinded endpoint assessment. A sub-study will investigate feasibility and efficacy of guided self-management using smartwatches. Follow-up duration is at least 1 year after randomization.

Trial population Symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF, ≥18 years of age, who have an indication for rate-control therapy. Patients with contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol, a history of persistent AF, or prior pulmonary vein ablation will be excluded.

Interventions

A total of 436 participants will be randomized to receive oral verapamil 240 mg slow-release or metoprolol 100 mg retard. A subset of participants will monitor heart rate using a smartwatch and adjust the study medication dose using heart rate data and a flow chart supported by a central service center.

Sample size and data analysis

A total of 436 patients with paroxysmal AF will be randomized. Endpoints will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using standard statistical techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • verapamil
  • metoprolol
  • rate control
  • rhythm control
  • paroxysmal
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • ECG documented diagnosis of paroxysmal AF
  • Presence of symptomatic paroxysmal AF, defined as recurrent self-terminating AF (≥ 2 episodes in last 4 months) documented by typical symptoms, ECG or photoplethysmo-gram
  • Able and willing to sign informed consent.

For SMART sub study only:

- Own a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

7.3 Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • A history of electrical cardioversion for persistent AF
  • History of AF episode > 7 days
  • Previous or current chronic amiodaron use.
  • A history of pulmonary vein ablation
  • Taking part in another randomized trial
  • Reduced life-expectancy of \< 1 year
  • Presence of contra-indication for verapamil or metoprolol
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Or women who are planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • For substudy patients: already participating in an eHealth program

Contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol:

  • Known hypersensitivity, intolerance or allergy to verapamil, metoprolol, or any excipi-ents.
  • Current use of verapamil, diltiazem, beta-blockers or digoxin, or \< 5 half-lives ago at the time of randomization.
  • Concomitant use of medications with absolute contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol (e.g., strong CYP3A4 inhibitors).*
  • Resting heart rate \< 50 beats per minute at baseline.
  • Symptomatic hypotension (or systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg).
  • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block.
  • Sick sinus syndrome or sinus node disease.
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
  • Severe heart failure (NYHA class III-IV or left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45%).
  • Clinically significant constipation requiring medical intervention.
  • Severe bronchial asthma or COPD with bronchial hyperreactivity.
  • Untreated pheochromocytoma (unless patient is concomitantly treated with an α-blocker).
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus with frequent symptomatic hypoglycaemia where β-blocker use would pose unacceptable risk due to masking of symptoms.
  • Severe symptomatic peripheral arterial disease or disabling Raynaud's phenomenon.
  • Pacemaker therapy in place. An implanted loop recorder is not a contraindication.
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).
  • Severe renal impairment (eGFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73m²). *Patients using statins can be switched to an equivalent dose of rosuvastatin prior to ran-domization. Patients using oral anticoagulation need to be switched to apixaban or rivaroxa-ban.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
436 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    verapamil

    rate control with verapamil 240 mg od

    Drug: Verapamil 240 mg slow-release tablet

  • Active comparator
    metoprolol

    rate control with metoprolol 100 mg od

    Drug: metoprolol 100 mg slow-release tablet

Interventions

  • DrugVerapamil 240 mg slow-release tablet

    rate control with verapamil 240 mg od

  • Drugmetoprolol 100 mg slow-release tablet

    Rate control with metoprolol 100 mg od

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The time to hospitalization for AF, cardioversion, or referral for pulmonary vein ablation

    Time frame: follow-up duration is at least 1 year after randomisation and can range from 1 to 3 years

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in publications (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared. This includes baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and adverse event data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07445789
Lead sponsor
Martini Hospital Groningen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Robert G Tieleman, MD, PhD
Contact
r.tieleman@gmail.com
+31505245245
Scientific Department Martini Hospital
Contact
wetenschap@mzh.nl
+31505246311
Robert G Tieleman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Martini Hospital Groningen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion