ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07445789SMART-VERAPAFUpdated Mar 27, 2026

SMART-VERAPAF: Self-MAnagement and Random Therapy With VERApamil or Metoprolol in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Verapamil 240 mg slow-release tablet and metoprolol 100 mg slow-release tablet in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), sponsored by Martini Hospital Groningen. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by Martini Hospital Groningen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
436
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The SMART-VERAPAF study investigates the effects of different heart rate-lowering medications in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). This heart rhythm disorder is associated with a large number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for cardioversions and ablations. In this study, patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF are randomized to treatment with heart rate reduction using verapamil or metoprolol, both licensed for this indication. In addition, in a subset of patients, the effect of centrally guided self-care using smartwatch data will be evaluated.

The hypothesis is that both verapamil and guided self-care will lead to better heart rate control and fewer cardioversions and pulmonary vein ablations in patients with paroxysmal AF. This will also result in fewer hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and costs, as well as improved quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Rationale

In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), heart rate-suppressing therapy is used to reduce symptoms and prevent heart failure. However, recent studies show that more than 30% of paroxysmal AF patients experience inappropriate high heart rates for over 50% of the time while in AF. Most patients are treated with beta-blockers for adequate rate control, while less than 5% are treated with verapamil.

Hypothesis and objectives

The investigators hypothesize that treatment with verapamil is superior for heart rate suppression in patients with paroxysmal AF, because dose titration is not hampered by sinus bradycardia outside AF episodes. This advantage is expected to lead to less clinical progression of AF and therefore fewer AF-related hospital admissions, fewer cardioversions, and fewer referrals for ablation. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that guided self-management using smartwatch data improves the quality of heart rate suppression, resulting in fewer symptoms, fewer unplanned hospital admissions, fewer cardioversions, and fewer referrals for ablation.

Main trial endpoints

The primary outcome measure is the time to hospitalization for AF, cardioversion, or referral for pulmonary vein ablation during at least 1 year follow-up after randomization.

Secondary trial endpoints

Secondary outcome measures include hospitalizations for heart failure, the number of AF-related hospital days, outpatient visits for AF, echocardiographic parameters, heart rate and blood pressure, quality of life, symptoms, activity level, and costs.

Trial design

This is a multicenter, prospective, double-blind randomized study with blinded endpoint assessment. A sub-study will investigate feasibility and efficacy of guided self-management using smartwatches. Follow-up duration is at least 1 year after randomization.

Trial population Symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF, ≥18 years of age, who have an indication for rate-control therapy. Patients with contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol, a history of persistent AF, or prior pulmonary vein ablation will be excluded.

Interventions

A total of 436 participants will be randomized to receive oral verapamil 240 mg slow-release or metoprolol 100 mg retard. A subset of participants will monitor heart rate using a smartwatch and adjust the study medication dose using heart rate data and a flow chart supported by a central service center.

Sample size and data analysis

A total of 436 patients with paroxysmal AF will be randomized. Endpoints will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using standard statistical techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • verapamil
  • metoprolol
  • rate control
  • rhythm control
  • paroxysmal
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 436 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Martini Hospital Groningen is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • documented diagnosis of paroxysmal AF
  • Presence of symptomatic paroxysmal AF, defined as recurrent self-terminating AF (≥ 2 episodes in last 4 months) documented by typical symptoms, ECG or photoplethysmo-gram
  • Able and willing to sign .

For SMART sub study only:

- Own a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

7.3 Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • A history of electrical cardioversion for persistent AF
  • History of AF episode > 7 days
  • Previous or current chronic amiodaron use.
  • A history of pulmonary vein ablation
  • Taking part in another randomized trial
  • Reduced life-expectancy of \< 1 year
  • Presence of for verapamil or metoprolol
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Or women who are planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • For substudy patients: already participating in an eHealth program

Contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol:

  • Known , intolerance or allergy to verapamil, metoprolol, or any excipi-ents.
  • Current use of verapamil, diltiazem, beta-blockers or digoxin, or \< 5 half-lives ago at the time of randomization.
  • Concomitant use of medications with absolute contraindications for verapamil or metoprolol (e.g., strong inhibitors).*
  • Resting heart rate \< 50 beats per minute at baseline.
  • Symptomatic hypotension (or systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg).
  • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block.
  • Sick sinus syndrome or sinus node disease.
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
  • Severe heart failure ( class III-IV or \< 45%).
  • constipation requiring medical intervention.
  • Severe bronchial asthma or with bronchial hyperreactivity.
  • Untreated pheochromocytoma (unless patient is concomitantly treated with an α-blocker).
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus with frequent symptomatic hypoglycaemia where β-blocker use would pose unacceptable risk due to masking of symptoms.
  • Severe symptomatic peripheral arterial disease or disabling Raynaud's phenomenon.
  • Pacemaker therapy in place. An implanted loop recorder is not a contraindication.
  • Severe hepatic impairment ( class C).
  • Severe renal impairment ( \< 30 ml/min/1.73m²). *Patients using statins can be switched to an equivalent dose of rosuvastatin prior to ran-domization. Patients using oral anticoagulation need to be switched to apixaban or rivaroxa-ban.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
436 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    verapamil

    rate control with verapamil 240 mg od

    Drug: Verapamil 240 mg slow-release tablet

  • Active comparator
    metoprolol

    rate control with metoprolol 100 mg od

    Drug: metoprolol 100 mg slow-release tablet

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The time to hospitalization for AF, cardioversion, or referral for pulmonary vein ablation

    Time frame: follow-up duration is at least 1 year after randomisation and can range from 1 to 3 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in publications (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared. This includes baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and adverse event data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be available beginning 12 months following publication of the primary results and ending 5 years after publication.

Access criteria: Data will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the PI (r.tieleman@gmail.com). To gain access, requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be shared for the purpose of achieving the aims outlined in the approved proposal.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2029, 36 months later.

Of 129 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 81. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 81.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 25, 2026
First posted
Mar 3, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
Mar 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07445789
Lead sponsor
Martini Hospital Groningen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Robert G Tieleman, MD, PhD
Contact
r.tieleman@gmail.com
+31505245245
Scientific Department Martini Hospital
Contact
wetenschap@mzh.nl
+31505246311
Robert G Tieleman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Martini Hospital Groningen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Verapamil

Start the discussion