ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07444333Updated Sep 22, 2026

Cardiac Output and Fatigue in Friedreich's Ataxia

An interventional study of Aerobic Exercise in Friedreich's Ataxia, sponsored by Scott Barbuto. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Scott Barbuto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 70 studies in Friedreich Ataxia with a site in United States — 17 open to participants now, 24 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Friedreich Ataxia · United States.

Planned enrollment
26th of 48
30 · median 33
Started
2026
with 6 others
No phase
5 of 70
1 open now
Primary completion
2028-02
later than 9 of 23 live
Registered
64th of 70
by date

Among the 70 studies in Friedreich Ataxia with a site in United States, this one is the 26th largest by planned enrollment of the 48 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2026, is one of 5 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 23 other live ones, and was the 64th registered.

Friedreich Ataxia

110 studies on the registry are indexed under Friedreich Ataxia; 27 are open to participants now.

Browse Friedreich Ataxia studies →

Open to participants now

17 of the 70 studies in Friedreich Ataxia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

11 more — sign in →

All 17 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 18 Friedreich Ataxia studies recruiting now, 9 (50%) set no upper age limit and 9 (50%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 70 studies in Friedreich Ataxia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a clinical trial examining to impact of aerobic training plus omaveloxolone in FRDA. Thirty individuals with FRDA will be recruited; 20 individuals will be on omaveloxolone treatment whereas the other ten individuals will not. Individuals will undergo baseline assessment including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), mFARS, gait speed, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), and 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT). Individuals will then perform 3-months of home aerobic training. Repeat assessments will be conducted at 3- and 6-months.

Read the detailed description

In February 2023, omaveloxolone became the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication for Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA). In its pivotal study, named MOXIe, researchers found that omaveloxolone significantly improved neurological function compared to placebo. The primary outcome measure was the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS), the gold standard for measuring ataxia symptoms in clinical trials for FRDA. However, there are several limitations with the use of mFARS:

  • It does not detect subtle disease progression over short time frames. For example, in MOXIe, differences between placebo and omaveloxolone were not detected until 48 weeks.
  • Some of the components of mFARS rely on clinical judgment, which can introduce variability between raters.
  • The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for mFARS has not been clearly defined.
  • The scale lacks sensitivity to detect changes in individuals with minimal symptoms or advanced disease.

Given these limitations, development of additional outcome measures for clinical trials to determine the impact of drugs like omaveloxolone is desirable. In this study, investigators propose using maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) as a future primary outcome measure for FRDA clinical trials. VO2max offers several advantages as an outcome measure:

  1. It is a direct physiological measure of aerobic capacity, reducing subjectivity compared to clinical scales like mFARS.
  2. It can detect subtle changes in aerobic function making it useful for monitoring intervention effects over time.
  3. It has a defined MCID, and higher VO2max is associated with better health outcomes making it a clinically meaningful endpoint.
  4. It is non-invasive and reproducible.

To examine the utility of VO2max as a primary outcome measure, this study will recruit 30 individuals with FRDA in this pilot study. Twenty individuals will be on omaveloxolone treatment whereas the other 10 individuals will not. Individuals will undergo baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine VO2max. Secondary measures will include cardiac output. All participants will be given a recumbent bicycle for home use. Participants will be expected to cycle 30-minutes per session, 5x per week at 65-75% maximum heart rate (moderate intensity) for 3-months. To track training, individuals will be given a Fitbit Charge 6, and an exercise physiologist will call every two weeks to adjust training as needed. To determine benefits of training with omaveloxolone, repeat assessments will occur at 3- and 6-months.

AIM 1: Acceptability and Feasibility of Home Aerobic Exercise. Individuals with other types of ataxia have been able to train at the above levels safely. We hypothesize that there will be no serious adverse events related to aerobic training, and there will be an acceptable number of minor adverse events. The investigators further hypothesize that drop-out from the trial will be less than 25%.

AIM 2: Impact of Omaveloxolone on VO2max. Omaveloxolone works by activating and preventing the degradation of Nuclear factor-like 2 (Nrf2), which helps prevent oxidative damage within the mitochondria of individuals with FRDA. Improved mitochondrial function should significantly enhance VO2max by increasing ATP production and improving the rate of oxygen consumption. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that individuals on omaveloxolone will have a significantly larger increase in VO2max after the aerobic training when compared to individuals who are not on omaveloxolone.

AIM 3: Impact of Aerobic Training + Omaveloxolone on Fatigue. Omaveloxolone has been shown to cause a transient (12-week) increase in fatigue. Aerobic training, on the other hand, is known to improve fatigue in individuals with other hereditary ataxias. For this aim, the primary outcome measure will be the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) with secondary measures of Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The investigators hypothesize improved fatigue with the incorporation of aerobic training and that individuals in the omaveloxolone group will have less fatigue than those not on omaveloxolone.

This pilot study will provide the foundation for the use of VO2max as an outcome measure in future FRDA trials. It will also examine the synergistic effect of omaveloxolone and aerobic training which may show greater improvement than either intervention alone, including improvements in fatigue.

03

Conditions studied

  • Friedreich's Ataxia

Keywords

  • Friedreich's ataxia
  • Aerobic exercise
  • Omaveloxolone
  • Fatigue
  • Cardiac Output
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Genetically confirmed FRDA
  2. Ability to safely ride a stationary bicycle (mFARS sitting posture sub-score \<2)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Beck depression score >19, a score that precludes ability to exercise.
  2. (MoCA) score \<23/30
  3. Disorders that interfere with ability to perform endurance exercise (e.g., stroke, respiratory problems, traumatic brain injury, or neuromuscular disease).
  4. Regular participation in vigorous endurance exercise (defined as >2 days/week for at least the past 4 months at max HR>65%).
  5. Evidence of serious arrhythmias or ischemic heart disease.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Home Aerobic Training on Omaveloxolone

    Participants who are currently taking Skyclarys (omaveloxolone) will be given a recumbent exercise bike (Marcy ME-709 Adjustable Recumbent Exercise Bike, Pomona, CA) for home use. They will be instructed to exercise five times a week. The regimen will include 5-minute warm up, 30 minutes of exercise at target heart rate, and 5 minutes of cool down.

    Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Home Aerobic Training off Omaveloxolone

    Participants who are not taking Skyclarys (omaveloxolone) will be given a recumbent exercise bike (Marcy ME-709 Adjustable Recumbent Exercise Bike, Pomona, CA) for home use. They will be instructed to exercise five times a week. The regimen will include 5-minute warm up, 30 minutes of exercise at target heart rate, and 5 minutes of cool down.

    Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralAerobic Exercise

    Both groups will receive aerobic training. The difference will be whether individuals are on or off omaveloxolone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events (Primary outcome for Aim 1)

    Adverse events are defined as exercise-related discomforts (muscle and joint pain), minor injuries (strains, sprains), and non-injurious falls. Serious adverse events are defined as hospitalization, surgery, death, or permanent disability. We will compare adverse and serious adverse events for both groups.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6 months

  2. Maximal Oxygen Consumption (primary outcome measure for Aim 2)

    Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) will be determined by a breath-by-breath measurement of VO2 with a Vmax Encore Metabolic System, while participants perform a progressive ramped exercise test using an electronic-braked lower body cycle ergometer (CareFusion Corp, San Diego, CA). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has been determined to be between 1.0-2.0 mL/kg/min.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, 6-months

  3. Fatigue Severity scale (primary outcome measure for Aim 3)

    A commonly used measure to assess fatigue in a variety of populations. A score change of 3.5 to 4.5 points is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, and 6-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6-Minute Walk Test

    A functional measure of exercise capacity, we will measure the maximum distance a participant can walk in 6 minutes over a 25-meter linear course. The MCID has been determined to be between 14.0 and 30.5 meters. Fatigability will be assessed comparing the distance traveled during the last minute compared to the first minute. This difference will be divided by distance walked in the first minute and expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, and 6-months

  2. Fatigue Impact Scale

    This scale assesses the perceived impact of fatigue on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning during the participant's past four weeks. An MCID of 3.9 to 8.1 has been determined for other movement disorders such as Parkinson's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, 6-months

  3. Cardiac Output

    PhysioFlow is a non-invasive device that allows you to determine cardiac output through impedence cardiography. It is FDA approved to determine cardiac output. Cardiac output will be determined both at rest and at maximal exertion during CPET testing.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, and 6-months

  4. Timed Up and Go

    To monitor balance and gait, TUG will be performed three times using the standard protocol, and the results will be averaged. Participants will be instructed to perform this test using the typical assistive device they use to walk outside if applicable. This test has been shown to be a reliable measure of balance in individuals with ataxia.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, and 6-months

  5. Gait Speed

    Gait Speed will be determined by asking participants to walk as fast as possible on a 10-meter runway three times, and the times will be averaged. The MCID has been determined to be between 0.1m/s to 0.2 m/s for various patient populations.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, 6-months

  6. mFARS

    mFARS is a validated measure of ataxia symptoms in individuals with FRDA. Scores range from 0-93 points, with higher scores indicating more ataxia. Research has shown the mFARS has good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability. The minimal clinically important difference is not clearly defined, however.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, 6-months

  7. Exercise Adherence

    We will determine the average number of days per week exercised and duration of the exercise at target heart rate. The measure for achieving levels of exercise intensity is derived from the average heart rate during an exercise session expressed as a percentage of the maximal heart rate for the individual.

    Time frame: 0, 3-, 6-months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be made available upon request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: It will be available after study completion around 12/14/2027

Access criteria: They will have access to the study protocol and de-identified data. It will be deposited in an NIH database.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 18 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
StartActual
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07444333
Lead sponsor
Scott Barbuto
Collaborators
Biogen
Responsible party
Scott Barbuto (Assistant Professor at Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Scott Barbuto, MD PhD
Contact
sb3779@cumc.columbia.edu
12123054818

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion