ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07443254Updated Mar 9, 2026

Prospective IR-led Sedation Feasibility

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ketamine and Fentanyl (IV) in Anesthesia, Sedation and Analgesia and Interventional Radiology, sponsored by CAMC Health System. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-09.

Sponsored by CAMC Health System · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study wants to see if some interventional radiology (IR) procedures can be done without using general anesthesia. General anesthesia needs a lot of staff and equipment. It can also cause side effects. There are not enough anesthesia providers, which makes it harder to use for every procedure.

The researchers will test deep sedation with ketamine instead. They will start with 20 patients. If it works well and is safe, they may include up to 40 patients.

Patients will be asked to join the study before their procedure. The anesthesia team will be told ahead of time and will be ready to help if needed. The IR team will give the deep sedation and follow all safety rules.

The main goal is to finish the procedure without stopping early or switching to general anesthesia. The study will call this successful if fewer than 10% of cases fail. The researchers will also look at patient pain, patient satisfaction, any side effects, and how long recovery takes.

Read the detailed description

The long-term goal of this study is to improve patient care and healthcare system efficiency by reducing reliance on general anesthesia (GA) for interventional radiology (IR) procedures that have traditionally required anesthesiology support. GA is resource-intensive, associated with airway instrumentation and postoperative side effects, and increasingly constrained by national anesthesiology workforce shortages. This prospective, single-center, single-arm feasibility pilot will evaluate IR-led ketamine-based deep sedation in an initial cohort of 20 patients undergoing IR procedures that would ordinarily be performed under GA, with prespecified expansion to up to 40 participants if early feasibility and safety criteria are met. Eligible patients will be approached prior to their procedure, and the anesthesiology service will be formally consulted in advance and available for immediate escalation if needed. Deep sedation will be administered by the IR sedation team under institutional deep sedation privileges and monitoring standards. The primary outcome is feasibility: successful completion of the planned procedure without failure, where failure is defined as procedure abortion due to inadequate sedation or intolerance, or escalation to anesthesiology takeover and/or conversion to GA. A prespecified feasibility threshold of ≤10% failure will be used. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain and satisfaction, peri-procedural adverse events, and recovery duration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Sedation and Analgesia
  • Interventional Radiology
03

In context

Lead sponsor

CAMC Health System is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and older
  • Planned to undergo an image-guided IR procedure for which general anesthesia would ordinarily be requested, as determined by the performing IR physician
  • Determined by the performing IR physician to be an appropriate candidate for attempted IR-led ketamine- based deep sedation, with anesthesiology available for escalation if needed
  • Ability to provide written for participation in a study involving deep sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ingestion of solid food within 6-8 hours prior to the procedure, per institutional deep sedation guidelines
  • Known allergy or to ketamine, fentanyl or midazolam
  • Inability to provide or lack of decision-making capacity
  • Prisoner status
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or other condition in which ketamine-associated sympathetic stimulation would pose unacceptable risk (e.g., aortic dissection, acute myocardial infarction)
  • Pregnancy or lactation, due to to ketamine/midazolam
  • History of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders for which ketamine is contraindicated
  • Medical conditions that, in the judgment of the performing IR physician in consultation with anesthesiology, preclude safe administration of ketamine-based deep sedation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine-based Sedation

    Eligible participants will include adults (≥18 years) scheduled to undergo image-guided IR procedures for which general anesthesia would ordinarily be requested. These may include, but are not limited to, image-guided percutaneous spine biopsy, biliary procedures, ablations, and embolizations. These may also include less invasive procedures on patients who previously did not tolerate light or moderate sedation. Participants receive deep sedation led by the Interventional Radiology team using a combination of ketamine, midazolam, and fentanyl. The sedation regimen follows guidelines set forth in other procedures. An initial intravenous bolus of 1-2 mg midazolam, followed by 30-50 mg intravenous ketamine, with additional 10-30 mg ketamine boluses administered every 10-15 minutes as needed, not to exceed a maximum dose of 2 mg/kg. Boluses of 0.5-1 mg intravenous midazolam and 25-50 mcg intravenous fentanyl will be administered every 10-15 minutes as needed to achieve deep sedation.

    Drug: ketamine · Drug: Fentanyl (IV) · Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

  • Ketamine will be administered as follows: initial intravenous bolus of 30-50 mg intravenous ketamine, with additional 10-30 mg ketamine boluses administered every 10-15 minutes as needed, not to exceed a maximum dose of 2 mg/kg.

  • 25-50 mcg of intravenous fentanyl will be administered every 10-15 minutes as needed during the procedure.

  • Midazolam will be administered as follows: an initial intravenous bolus of 1-2 mg midazolam followed by maintenance boluses of 0.5-1 mg intravenous midazolam as needed to achieve deep sedation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aim 1 - Feasibility

    For Aim 1, feasibility will be assessed by calculating the proportion of procedures completed without failure, where failure is defined as procedure abortion due to inadequate sedation or patient intolerance, or escalation to anesthesiology takeover and/or conversion to general anesthesia. The observed failure proportion will be reported with exact (Clopper-Pearson) 95% confidence intervals. Feasibility will be interpreted relative to the prespecified threshold of ≤10% failure.

    Time frame: From enrollment in the study immediately before the procedure to the completion of the patient satisfaction survey given after surgical recovery, within 2-hours post-op. Enrollment, procedure, and survey are completed in the same day.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Pain

    Pain will be assessed using the validated 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The study coordinator will document pre-procedure pain and post-procedure pain in the immediate recovery period. If a participant reports no recall of the procedure, this will be recorded as "no recall of pain/procedure" rather than imputing a numeric score. All pain scale measurements occur the same day as the procedure, and there are no other longitudinal measurements.

    Time frame: Pre-procedure (baseline; immediately before procedure) and post-procedure (immediately after recovery period; within 2 hours post-op).

  2. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a modified Heidelberg peri-anesthetic questionnaire (18 questions) administered in the recovery area prior to discharge or return to the inpatient unit. Questions 1-16 are rated on a scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Question 17 asks if the patient would, in the future, have "more sedation," "same sedation," or "less sedation." Question 18 asks the patient to rate their level of pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: Questionnaire given after recovery from procedure (within 2 hours post-op).

  3. Recovery Duration

    Recovery duration will be defined as the time from procedure completion to discharge from the procedural recovery area or return to the inpatient unit, reflecting clinically meaningful recovery rather than anesthetic emergence alone.

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure to discharge from recovery area (within 2 hours post-op).

  4. Sedation-Related Adverse Events

    Sedation-related adverse events will be prospectively documented and will include: * Hypotension or hypertension requiring intervention * Oxygen desaturation \<90% * Need for airway intervention * Escalation to anesthesiology takeover and/or conversion to general anesthesia * Administration of reversal agents * Post-procedural nausea, vomiting, or hallucinations not responsive to medications Procedure-related adverse events will include bleeding, pneumothorax, infection, and other complications classified according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice. Vital signs, including lowest oxygen saturation and lowest and highest blood pressure during the procedure, will be recorded. This outcome is for the single day in which the procedure occurs. No pre-procedural or longitudinal data is applicable.

    Time frame: The procedure begins and finishes in one day. Adverse events that occur during the procedure, immediately after, and after recovery (within 2-hours post-procedure) will be recorded.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CAMC Memorial
    Charleston, West Virginia 25304, United States
    Recruiting
    • Amy R Deipolyi, M.D., Ph.D. · Contactamy.deipolyi@vandaliahealth.org · 304-388-8199
    • Amy R Deipolyi, M.D., Ph.D. · Principal investigator
    • Adam M Belcher, Ph.D. · Sub investigator
    • Michael V Korona, M.D. · Sub investigator
    • Steven M Cooper, M.D. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Greco GF, Al-Asadi Z, Belcher AM, Mattox E, Korona MV, Deipolyi AR. Ketamine/Midazolam versus Fentanyl/Midazolam Sedation for Interventional Radiology Procedures: A Prospective Registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1002-1010.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.01.050. Epub 2025 Feb 3. PubMed 39909176 ↗
  • Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB, Connolly BL, Devane AM, Morris CS, Cohen AM, Midia M, Thornton RH, Gross K, Caplin DM, Aeron G, Misra S, Patel NH, Walker TG, Martinez-Salazar G, Silberzweig JE, Nikolic B. Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1432-1437.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27. PubMed 28757285 ↗
  • Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005. PubMed 21856077 ↗
  • Schiff JH, Fornaschon AS, Frankenhauser S, Schiff M, Snyder-Ramos SA, Martin E, Knapp S, Bauer M, Bottiger BW, Motsch J. The Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire--development of a new refined psychometric questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1096-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05576.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20. PubMed 18717664 ↗
  • Simonsen CZ, Schonenberger S, Henden PL, Yoo AJ, Uhlmann L, Rentzos A, Bosel J, Valentin J, Rasmussen M. Patients Requiring Conversion to General Anesthesia during Endovascular Therapy Have Worse Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data from the SAGA Collaboration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;41(12):2298-2302. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6823. Epub 2020 Oct 22. PubMed 33093133 ↗
  • Sharif S, Kang J, Sadeghirad B, Rizvi F, Forestell B, Greer A, Hewitt M, Fernando SM, Mehta S, Eltorki M, Siemieniuk R, Duffett M, Bhatt M, Burry L, Perry JJ, Petrosoniak A, Pandharipande P, Welsford M, Rochwerg B. Pharmacological agents for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department and intensive care unit: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;132(3):491-506. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.050. Epub 2024 Jan 6. PubMed 38185564 ↗
  • Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5. PubMed 14667752 ↗
  • Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Adverse effects of general anaesthetics. Drug Saf. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(6):434-59. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199207060-00005. PubMed 1418699 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data obtained from this study relies on sedation success, patient opinion surveys, and pain scales. The informed consent form signed by participants does not include a provision for the sharing of individual participant-level data with outside researchers. Data disclosure is limited to study personnel, hospital staff, and regulatory agencies. Data that is relevant to the outcomes of the study, as well as detailed statistical methods, will be included in publications that use the data gathered from this trial.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07443254
Lead sponsor
CAMC Health System
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
Start date
Mar 2, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 9, 2026

Study contacts

Amy R Deipolyi, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
Amy.Deipolyi@vandaliahealth.org
304-388-8199
Adam M Belcher, Ph.D.
Contact
adam.belcher@vandaliahealth.org
304-388-9920
Amy R Deipolyi, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · CAMC Department of Interventional Radiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ketamine · Fentanyl · Midazolam

Start the discussion