ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07440940Updated Feb 27, 2026

Timing of Subcostal TAPB Combined With Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block combined with rectus sheath block in Postoperative Pain and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, sponsored by Eulji University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Eulji University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether the timing of ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) affects postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive the combined regional blocks either before surgical incision or after completion of surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured using a numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and other recovery parameters.

The results of this study may help optimize the timing of abdominal wall blocks to improve postoperative analgesia and recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a significant clinical concern despite the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks, including subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and rectus sheath block (RSB), are widely used to reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements. However, the optimal timing of block administration relative to surgical incision remains unclear.

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial will compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-incisional versus post-operative administration of combined ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block and RSB in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using block randomization with randomly permuted block sizes. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia protocols will be applied to all participants.

The primary outcome will be postoperative pain intensity measured using a numerical rating scale at predefined time points after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include cumulative opioid consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, rescue analgesic requirements, and recovery profiles.

The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence for optimizing the timing of abdominal wall block administration to improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
  • Rectus Sheath Block
  • Postoperative pain
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Eulji University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Adults aged 18 to 80 years
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide
  • (ASA) physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of significant pain unrelated to the target disease that may interfere with pain assessment
  • Known allergy or to study medications (ropivacaine, acetaminophen, nefopam, or pethidine)
  • Planned single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • (ASA) physical status IV or higher
  • Infection of the abdominal wall or skin at the injection site, or anatomical abnormalities of the abdominal wall
  • Major neurological, psychiatric, or systemic diseases that may affect pain perception, treatment response, or study evaluation
  • Requirement for postoperative mechanical ventilation
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Considered unsuitable for the study by the investigator
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pre-incisional Block Group

    Participants receive ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block combined with rectus sheath block

  • Experimental
    Postoperative Block Group

    Participants receive ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) after completion of surgery and before emergence from anesthesia.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block combined with rectus sheath block

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided subcostal TAP block combined with rectus sheath block

    Ultrasound-guided right subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) is performed under sterile conditions using local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum postoperative pain intensity within 24 hours

    The highest postoperative pain intensity measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during the first 24 hours after surgery, assessed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum postoperative pain intensity during post-anesthesia care unit stay

    The highest postoperative pain intensity measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during the recovery period.

    Time frame: During the post-anesthesia care unit stay

  2. Cumulative rescue opioid consumption within 24 hours

    Total amount of rescue opioid administered between 1 and 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  3. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Occurrence of nausea or vomiting during the postoperative period.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Nowon Eulji University Hospital
    Seoul, 01830, South Korea
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 10 months after the start.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 22, 2026
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
StartActual
Feb 23, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 15, 2027
Last update
Feb 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07440940
Lead sponsor
Eulji University Hospital
Responsible party
Hye-yeon Cho (Assistant professor, Eulji University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Feb 23, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Hye-Yeon Cho, MD
Contact
anesthesia_chy@eulji.ac.kr
+82-2-970-8705
Soojeong Kang, MD
Contact
20260034@eulji.ac.kr
+82-2-970-8705
Hye-yeon Cho
principal investigator · Nowon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion