ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07430657Updated Apr 29, 2026

Nurse-Led PTSD Treatment in Primary Care

An interventional study of NurseNET and Referral to PTSD Treatment in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose of the Study Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common and serious condition, but many people cannot get the help they need because there are not enough mental health specialists (like psychologists or psychiatrists) available. This study is testing a new program called NurseNET. The goal of NurseNET is to train nurses to provide a proven, short-term trauma treatment called Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET).

Why This Study is Important Most people see their nurse or doctor for health concerns. Because nurses are highly trusted and already work on the front lines of healthcare, they may be in the best position to offer PTSD treatment quickly and conveniently. This study aims to see if nurse-led care can bridge the gap between patients and the treatment they deserve.

What the Study Involves Researchers will enroll 100 participants who have symptoms of PTSD. Participants will work with a trained nurse in a primary care setting to complete the NurseNET program.

The Treatment: The program consists of 4 to 6 sessions. During these sessions, the nurse helps the patient talk through their life story and process difficult memories in a safe, supportive way.

What We Are Measuring: The research team will look at several factors to see if the program is successful:

Effectiveness: Do PTSD symptoms improve after working with the nurse?

Feasibility and Acceptability: Do patients and nurses find this type of care easy to use and helpful?

Health Impact: Since PTSD is linked to heart health, the study will also look at whether the treatment improves things like blood pressure or physical activity levels.

Goal of the Research By the end of this study, researchers hope to show that nurses can safely and effectively provide trauma care. If successful, this model could be used across the United States to make PTSD treatment much easier to access for everyone.

Read the detailed description

Background and Theoretical Framework This Type 2 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial is designed to address the critical gap in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment for patients who have experienced co-occurring physical illness, namely cardiovascular (CV) events. Approximately one-third of CV event survivors develop PTSD, which serves as an independent risk factor for further CV morbidity and mortality. This study utilizes the Enduring Somatic Threat (EST) model, which posits that PTSD is driven by a persistent internal threat and can manifest as Fear-Related Behavioral Avoidance (FRBA). FRBA often leads to poor medication adherence and avoidance of necessary physical activities, creating a recursive cycle of poor health outcomes.

The NurseNET Intervention

The core of the experimental arm is Nurse-delivered Narrative Exposure Therapy (NurseNET), an evidence-based, four-session protocol integrated directly into the primary care (PC) setting. The treatment is delivered by specially trained nurses and follows a manualized structure:

Session 1: Includes psychoeducation regarding medical trauma and the co-reconstruction of a "Lifeline", a chronological, autobiographical narrative of the patient's life events.

Sessions 2-4: Focus on gradual imaginative exposure, where the nurse guides the patient to systematically process and extinguish trauma-related fear memories.

Safety Component: Every session concludes with structured somatic relaxation or "grounding" exercises to help participants regulate emotional arousal.

Study Design and Objectives Participants (N=100) are randomized 1:1 to either the NEST intervention or minimally-enhanced usual care (UC). The UC arm receives identical psychoeducation but is provided with external referrals for trauma treatment rather than co-located, nurse-led care.

The trial aims to evaluate three primary domains:

Effectiveness: Assessing changes in PTSD symptom severity (PCL-5) as the primary outcome, alongside secondary measures of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and CV-specific outcomes like blood pressure and medication adherence.

Implementation: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify contextual drivers and implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity) to develop a replicable blueprint for future large-scale integration.

Cost-Effectiveness: Conducting a preliminary analysis of direct intervention costs and healthcare resource utilization (e.g., ED visits and hospitalizations) over 12 months.

Safety and Monitoring To ensure participant safety, a Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will conduct interim reviews when 25% and 50% of the target sample is reached. The study excludes individuals with acute safety risks, such as active suicidal ideation, and provides clinical consultation with psychiatry and psychology for managing acute distress if it arises during exposure sessions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD

Keywords

  • post traumatic stress disorder
  • primary care
  • nurse
03

In context

Combat Disorders

200 studies on the registry are indexed under Combat Disorders; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 167 interventional studies indexed under Combat Disorders.

Browse Combat Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 397 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • o PTSD + trauma exposure (PCL-5 score ≥28, plus trauma endorsed on LEC-5/CAPS)

    • Life-threatening CV event in the last 90 days (including myocardial infarction/heart attack, acute cerebrovascular accident/stroke, sudden cardiac arrest, acute decompensated heart failure, or life-threatening arrhythmia requiring cardioversion or defibrillation).
    • Primary care patient at Rush University Medical Center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • o Safety risk (documented suicidal ideation/need for acute psychiatric care)

    • NET conflict (actively receiving psychotherapy/PTSD treatment)
    • Cognitive/decisional non-capacity (University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent [UBACC] ≤ 14.5)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NurseNET

    The NurseNET experimental arm involves training primary care nurses to deliver a condensed, 4 session version of Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) to patients with PTSD symptoms. This task sharing approach integrates evidence-based trauma treatment directly into the primary care workflow to increase service access and improve select health outcomes.

    Behavioral: NurseNET

  • Active comparator
    Minimally-Enhanced Usual Care

    The minimally-enhanced usual care arm consists of provision of psychoeducational materials regarding trauma symptoms and available community resources, followed by referral to PTSD treatment. This arm serves as a rigorous control to account for the effects of time and general medical attention while identifying the specific clinical impact of the nurse-led Narrative Exposure Therapy intervention.

    Behavioral: Referral to PTSD Treatment

Interventions

  • BehavioralNurseNET

    NurseNET is a pragmatic clinical intervention designed to deliver evidence-based PTSD treatment within primary care workflows. It is distinguished from traditional Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) and other primary care behavioral health interventions by the following four core elements: Nurse-Led Task Sharing. Unlike traditional models that rely on licensed mental health specialists (psychologists or social workers), NurseNET is delivered entirely by nurses. This leverages the existing nursing workforce to bypass specialist shortages and reduce the "referral cliff" associated with external mental health consultations. Dose-Compressed Protocol. While standard NET often extends to 10 or more sessions, NurseNET utilizes a condensed 4-session format. This "minimum therapeutic dose" is specifically engineered for the high-throughput U.S. healthcare environment. We use a safety-net supervision framework and leverage the holistic nurse preparation in the context of co-located/integrated care

  • BehavioralReferral to PTSD Treatment

    Standard referral to PTSD treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)

    20-item self-report scale that assesses the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms; used to monitor symptom change/screen for probable PTSD diagnosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    9-item tool used to screen, diagnose, and monitor the severity of depression/depressive symptoms based on DSM-IV(/V) criteria.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)

    7-item clinical scale for screening and measuring the severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  3. Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8)

    8-item self-report instrument used to assess the somatic symptom burden, focusing on physical manifestations of psychological distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  4. Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5)

    5-item self-report scale used to identify non-adherent medication behaviors and beliefs about treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  5. Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions (PROMIS)

    4-item (short-form) instrument used to measure a patient's self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions, including symptoms and social tasks.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  6. EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D)

    5-item instrument for measuring health status and quality of life (mobility, self-care, activities, pain, anxiety/depression) used to calculate QALYs.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  7. Blood Pressure

    Clinical assessment of systolic and diastolic pressure to evaluate the impact of trauma recovery on hypertension risk.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

  8. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    4-item measure used to assess the perception of whether a specific intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory to stakeholders.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    4-item measure assessing the perceived fit or relevance of the intervention for a given setting or problem, such as referral-based care.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    4-item measure assessing extent to which an intervention can be successfully carried out within a given setting, such as primary care clinics.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    Recruiting
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kirsten Assistant Professor, PhD, FNP-C · Contactkirsten_dickins@rush.edu · 3129421442
    • Sarah Senior Research Operations Manager, MA, LCPC · Contact3129421442
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dickins KA. Improving Traumatic Stress with Justice-Impacted Women and Women Experiencing Homelessness: A Pilot Study of Narrative Exposure Therapy. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Feb;45(2):121-141. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2023.2238091. Epub 2023 Aug 24. PubMed 37616593 ↗
  • Dickins KA, Houlihan MC, Neely S, Smith DL, Nowell H, Karnik N, Held P. Improving post-traumatic stress symptoms in homeless-experienced women using narrative exposure therapy: a single-arm, open pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2026 Dec;17(1):2620215. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2620215. Epub 2026 Feb 6. PubMed 41645787 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared to ensure the maximum protection of participant privacy and confidentiality, which is paramount given the highly sensitive nature of the traumatic life events disclosed during Narrative Exposure Therapy. Due to the narrative nature of the intervention, the risk of deductive re-identification remains high even in de-identified datasets in this early, small sample pilot trial.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 27 months after the start.

Of 73 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Combat Disorders, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 79 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2026
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
StartActual
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Apr 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07430657
Responsible party
Kirsten A. Dickins (Assistant Professor, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion