ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07429994ReMIUS-BPOUpdated Feb 24, 2026

Predictors of Trifecta Achievement After HoLEP

An interventional study of Transurethral Holmium Laser Enuclation of the Prostate in HoLEP, Trifecta Achievement and Urinary Incontinence Following Surgical Procedure, sponsored by Ondokuz Mayıs University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by Ondokuz Mayıs University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
604
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a surgical treatment option for men experiencing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms due to an enlarged prostate. Researchers predict that specific participant or operator-dependent conditions before or during HoLEP may influence the trifecta outcome, based on similar studies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand what these conditions are. Trifecta success indicates a high-quality surgery based on three essential criteria: the treatment's effectiveness, ease of recovery, and the absence of serious side effects. In this study, trifecta is defined as relief from bothersome symptoms validated by international symptom score questionnaires, no urinary incontinence, and no serious events occurring within three months after HoLEP.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to identify preoperative and perioperative variables influencing trifecta achievement in HoLEP surgery and to determine the predictive value of these variables.

Based on the analysis of the collected data, it is anticipated that one or more variables will show a statistically significant association with trifecta outcomes.

Additionally, the study seeks to evaluate the predictive value of these variables for successfully reaching the trifecta. Based on our analysis of the collected data, we expect that one or more of these variables will show a statistically significant association with trifecta outcomes.

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are defined by the International Continence Society (ICS) as a constellation of complaints originating from lower urinary tract organs, such as the bladder, prostate, urethra, adjacent pelvic floor muscles, and distal ureters. A large-scale epidemiological study has shown that the prevalence of LUTS in men over 40 years of age is 62%, increasing with advancing age. LUTS in older men are most commonly attributed to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), and autopsy series have reported benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) histology in 60-80% of cases. All patients who are refractory to medical treatment or present with complications are candidates for surgical therapy.

In selecting the surgical approach, patient comorbidities, bladder neuromuscular function, and prostate volume are key determinants. Transurethral laser enucleation techniques (HoLEP, ThuLEP) are non-inferior to conventional methods in BPO surgery and even demonstrate advantages in patients in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy cannot be discontinued; accordingly, they have been incorporated into the European Association of Urology guidelines.

"Trifecta" refers to the achievement of three ideal and measurable conditions within a defined perioperative or postoperative period, representing surgical success from both the patient's and the surgeon's perspectives (functional outcomes and complications). As trifecta is a relatively new concept in BPO surgery, there are currently insufficient studies to establish universally accepted criteria. Moreover, because the factors contributing to trifecta achievement and their relative impact remain unclear, this clinical study has been designed.

Following approval by the local ethics committee, data of all patients treated with HoLEP between March 2026 and April 2028 will be prospectively collected.

All male patients with an indication for surgical treatment, and without clinically proven prostate cancer, bladder cancer, or neurogenic LUTS, will be included in the study. Preoperatively, all patients will undergo non-invasive laboratory and imaging evaluations, including complete blood count, routine biochemistry, urinalysis, urine culture, total PSA, uroflowmetry with post-void residual measurement (PVR), and ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging when clinically indicated. Standardized international questionnaires will be used for symptom assessment.

Postoperative complications will be classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system. All patients will be evaluated postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter, using uroflowmetry with PVR, total PSA, renal function tests, and international symptom questionnaires.

In our study, trifecta was defined as the simultaneous fulfillment of all of the following criteria at postoperative month 3: absence of complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II, absence of urinary incontinence, and at least a 30% reduction in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

The primary endpoint of the study was defined as trifecta achievement at postoperative month 3 following HoLEP. To identify factors predicting trifecta success, analyses were planned using a binary outcome (yes/no). The effects of preoperative and perioperative variables on trifecta achievement will be evaluated using logistic regression models. Variables found to be significant in univariable analyses or considered clinically relevant will be included in the multivariable model. Model predictive performance will be assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and results will be reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses will be two-sided, and a p-value \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

As the study was designed as a multivariable predictive model, the minimum sample size was calculated for multivariable logistic regression using the Riley framework with the pmsampsize package in R Studio (version 4.5.1). Based on the literature, trifecta prevalence was assumed to be 63%, approximately 10 parameters were expected to be included in the model, and a Cox-Snell R² of 0.15 was assumed. Accordingly, the minimum required sample size was calculated as 549 patients. Considering potential missing data and loss to follow-up, a 10% inflation was applied, resulting in a planned target sample size of approximately 604 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • HoLEP
  • Trifecta Achievement
  • Urinary Incontinence Following Surgical Procedure
  • Clavien Dindo Surgical Complication Scale
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
  • Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)
  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Keywords

  • HoLEP Trifecta
  • HoLEP Symptomatic Relief
  • HoLEP Predictive Factors
03

In context

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

416 studies on the registry are indexed under Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 604 is above the median of 100 across 272 interventional studies indexed under Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Browse Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ondokuz Mayıs University is the lead sponsor of 277 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All male patients aged ≥ 40 years who are candidates for surgical treatment for BPO.
  • Ability to provide , when required.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically proven active condition(s) that require another intervention other than BPO surgery, such as lower urinary tract , urethral stricture, or neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms.
  • History of previous surgery for BPO, urethral stricture, or prostate cancer.
  • Incomplete baseline or procedural data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
604 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HoLEP

    Only arm is the participants who are eligible to undergo HoLEP. Single arm, determination of predictors of the trifecta.

    Procedure: Transurethral Holmium Laser Enuclation of the Prostate

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransurethral Holmium Laser Enuclation of the Prostate

    HoLEP, En-bloc or tri-lobar technique.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Trifecta achievement three months after HoLEP

    Achievement of all three of the following criteria, three months after HoLEP: 1. At least a 30% reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) 2. Absence of major complications (no Clavien-Dindo grade \> II), 3. No urinary incontinence

    Time frame: From enrollment to the three months after the intervention for each participant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay After the Intervention

    Duration of hospitalization following the intervention. Unit: days

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  2. Change in peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)

    Difference in maximum urinary flow rate measured by uroflowmetry compared to baseline. Unit: mL/s

    Time frame: Starting one month after the intervention and continuing for one year after the intervention, with multiple measurements.

Other outcomes

  1. Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)

    Bladder voiding efficiency, defined as the ratio of voided volume to total bladder capacity. Ratio (unitless)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the three months after the intervention.

  2. Enucleation-Volume Ratio

    Enucleation-volume ratio, defined as the ratio of enucleated adenoma weight to pre-operatively measured prostate volume. Ratio (unitless).

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grosso AA, Amparore D, Di Maida F, de Cillis S, Cocci A, Di Dio M, Russo GI, Cimino S, Quara A, Salvi M, Fiori C, Mari A, Porpiglia F, Minervini A, Tuccio A. Comparison of perioperative and short-terms outcomes of en-bloc Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Sep;27(3):478-484. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00743-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19. PubMed 37857831 ↗
  • Bove AM, Brassetti A, Ochoa M, Anceschi U, D'Annunzio S, Ferriero M, Tuderti G, Misuraca L, Mastroianni R, Cartolano S, Torregiani G, Lombardo R, De Nunzio C, Simone G. Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison. Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(2):128-134. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.204. Epub 2023 Apr 17. PubMed 37483855 ↗
  • Grosso AA, Di Maida F, Nardoni S, Salvi M, Giudici S, Lambertini L, Cadenar A, Tellini R, Cocci A, Mari A, Minervini A, Tuccio A. Patterns and Predictors of Optimal Surgical and Functional Outcomes after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): Introducing the Concept of "Trifecta". World J Mens Health. 2023 Jul;41(3):603-611. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220042. Epub 2023 Jan 1. PubMed 36593708 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy concerns and data protection regulations, including the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK). Only aggregated, de-identified results will be reported in publications and presentations.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Apr 2028, 26 months later.

Of 98 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 26 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 119 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 28, 2026
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 26, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
Last update
Feb 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07429994
Responsible party
Murat Gulsen (Assistant Professor, Ondokuz Mayıs University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Jan 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 26, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Murat Gulsen Assistant Professor, MD
Contact
mglotr@gmail.com
+905062357421
Murat Gulsen, MD
principal investigator · Ondokuz Mayıs University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion