CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07428811Updated Feb 24, 2026

Effects of Task-Based Mirror Therapy for Post-stroke Shoulder-Hand Syndrome

An interventional study of Task based mirror therapy and Conventional exercises in Stroke, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to determine the effects of task-based mirror therapy on edema, pain and upper limb motor function with shoulder-hand syndrome in post stroke patients.

This randomized clinical trial will take place at Ittefaq Hospital and Trust Lahore and Alara healthcare clinic, Lahore involving 34 participants aged 45-75 years. Using a non-probability convenience sampling method, participants will be randomly assigned by online randomizing tool into two groups: experimental group (17 participants) and control group (17 participants). Both groups will undergo treatment for 30 minutes a day, five days a week, over four weeks. Each task will be performed by repeating each movement 20 times per set for three sets, with a 2-minute break between sets. There will also be 2-minute intervals between each completed task Outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), edema measured by the figure-of-eight method, and upper limb motor function evaluated using the Functional Independence measure (FIM). Assessments will occur at baseline and post-intervention.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a sudden neurological loss caused by cerebral vascular damage. Upper extremity paralysis is the most prevalent symptom in stroke patients. Stroke-related paralysis is typically caused by internal capsule injury. Neuroplasticity, which involves multiple sections of the brain, is necessary to heal from this damage.Upper extremity function makes up 60% of total body function, with hand function accounting for 90% of that. Shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS), a chronic neurological condition that can develop after a stroke, is defined by excruciating discomfort, edema, vasomotor instability, and impaired motor performance. SHS is often referred to as reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the upper limb or poststroke complicated regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The development of upper limb discomfort and edema observed in SHS was attributed to hemiparetic arms. After a stroke autonomic and motor dysfunction, as well as upper limb pain, can be symptoms of SHS. Pathophysiologic mechanisms may include somatosensory and central autonomic system in brain, peripheral sensitization as hyperexcitability of the afferent fibers and inflammation of peripheral nerves and central mechanism as maladaptive neuroplasticity of motor cortex.

Mirror therapy is an attractive treatment option for clinical practice because it is simple to implement, relatively inexpensive, less intimidating for patients, and often equally or more effective than many alternative treatments. However, not all mirror therapy studies involving stroke victims have yielded such encouraging results. One study observed that the positive effects of mirror therapy decreased over time, and that mirror therapy involving the repetition of simple movements produced improvements during the start of treatment but were followed by a gradual decrease in function as the patients became bored with the movements and began resisting therapy. Based on this observation, mirror therapy programs that incorporate a variety of functional tasks were proposed to be more effective than those involving only simple movements designed to mimic tasks. It was also suggested the use more functional and task-oriented programs that involved picking up a coin because simple movements restrict the functional recovery of more complicated movements performed using the upper extremity. It was observed that treatment was more effective when an actual coin was used rather than when the same motion was performed without a coin.

Traditional rehabilitation methods often inadequately address the specific symptoms of SHS, creating a compelling case for innovative approaches like TBMT. This method uses visual feedback to improve motor function while engaging patients in purposeful, task-oriented exercises. Mirror treatment improves brain plasticity and motor recovery. This study will help us understand the effects of this treatment method and will pay ways for upgraded treatment strategies to improve symptoms and may have better outcomes and prognosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Keywords

  • Edema
  • pain
  • shoulder hand syndrome
  • Task based mirror therapy
  • upper limb motor function
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Age 45 to 75 years.

  • Both male and female patients are included in the study.
  • Subacute stroke patients having stroke less than 6 months are included in this study.
  • Stable participants having a stroke severity score > 6 on National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
  • Modified Ashworth scale score ≤ 2 of the affected upper extremity.
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 24.
  • Patients who can sit with or without support.
  • No contractures of the affected shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers.
  • Participants who have no history of peripheral nerve injury or musculoskeletal disease

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Participants who have medical problems or co-morbidities that interdict their participation in the study.

      • Patients with severe apraxia, somatosensory problems.
      • Unilateral neglect
      • Severe contractures of the affected shoulder, elbow, wrist and finger.
      • Participants who show the symptoms of global or receptive aphasia.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group A

    Task based mirror therapy

    Other: Task based mirror therapy

  • Active comparator
    group B

    Conventional exercises

    Other: Conventional exercises

Interventions

  • OtherTask based mirror therapy

    Group A will undergo treatment for 30 minutes a day, five days a week, over four weeks. Each task will be performed by repeating each movement 20 times per set for three sets, with a 2-minute break between sets. There will also be 2-minute intervals between each completed task

  • OtherConventional exercises

    Group B will undergo treatment for 30 minutes a day, five days a week, over four weeks. Each task will be performed by repeating each movement 20 times per set for three sets, with a 2-minute break between sets. There will also be 2-minute intervals between each completed task

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an effective tool for assessing pain intensity in stroke patients, utilizing a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable." This scale is particularly valuable in stroke populations due to its simplicity and quick administration, allowing for effective communication of pain levels even in individuals with cognitive or physical impairments.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an effective tool for assessing pain intensity in stroke patients, utilizing a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable." This scale is particularly valuable in stroke populations due to its simplicity and quick administration, allowing for effective communication of pain levels even in individuals with cognitive or physical impairments.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Figure of 8 measurement method

    Figure 8 measurement method is a practical technique used to assess edema in the hand, particularly following a stroke. This method involves wrapping a flexible measuring tape around the hand and wrist in a figure-eight pattern, allowing for consistent measurements at specific anatomical points. It begins by placing the tape at the ulnar aspect of the wrist, passing it across the palm and around the fingers, and then returning to the starting point. Abnormal values indicating edema may be defined as an increase of more than 1-2 cm compared to the unaffected hand, signifying potential swelling due to conditions such as stroke, trauma, or inflammation

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Figure of 8 measurement method

    Figure 8 measurement method is a practical technique used to assess edema in the hand, particularly following a stroke. This method involves wrapping a flexible measuring tape around the hand and wrist in a figure-eight pattern, allowing for consistent measurements at specific anatomical points. It begins by placing the tape at the ulnar aspect of the wrist, passing it across the palm and around the fingers, and then returning to the starting point. Abnormal values indicating edema may be defined as an increase of more than 1-2 cm compared to the unaffected hand, signifying potential swelling due to conditions such as stroke, trauma, or inflammation

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Functional independence measure [FIM]

    The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assesses a patient's level of independence in daily activities following a stroke. It includes various domains such as self-care, mobility, and social cognition. An admission FIM score \> 70 has been associated with achieving non-dependence by discharge whereas those with an admission score \< 50 remained dependent

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assesses a patient's level of independence in daily activities following a stroke. It includes various domains such as self-care, mobility, and social cognition. An admission FIM score \> 70 has been associated with achieving non-dependence by discharge whereas those with an admission score \< 50 remained dependent

    Time frame: 4 weeks

06

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Alara healthcare clinic
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting
  • Ittefaq Hospital and Trust Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee JI, Kwon SW, Lee A, Tae WS, Pyun SB. Neuroanatomical correlates of poststroke complex regional pain syndrome: a voxel-based lesion symptom-mapping study. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 22;11(1):13093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92564-7. PubMed 34158602 ↗
  • Li L, Li J, He M. Treatment outcomes in post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: The role of combined acupuncture, traditional Chinese herb hot compress and rehabilitation training. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(4):1023-1030. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230267. PubMed 38517771 ↗
  • Feng S, Tang M, Huang G, Wang J, He S, Liu D, Gu L. EMG biofeedback combined with rehabilitation training may be the best physical therapy for improving upper limb motor function and relieving pain in patients with the post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1056156. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1056156. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36703623 ↗
  • Saha S, Sur M, Ray Chaudhuri G, Agarwal S. Effects of mirror therapy on oedema, pain and functional activities in patients with poststroke shoulder-hand syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2021 Jul;26(3):e1902. doi: 10.1002/pri.1902. Epub 2021 Mar 6. PubMed 33675672 ↗
  • Liu H, Xu Y, Jiang W, Hu F, Zhou Y, Pan L, Zhou F, Yin Y, Tan B. Effects of task-based mirror therapy on upper limb motor function in hemiplegia: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2024 Apr 11;25(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08081-1. PubMed 38605413 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07428811
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Nov 5, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Maha Sahar, MSPT-NM
Contact
mahasahar5@gmail.com
03003424449
Binash Afzal, PHD
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion