An observational study in Airway Assessment, sponsored by South Valley University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-20.
Sponsored by South Valley University · Observational
Clinical and ultrasound indices of airway, in addition to laryngoscopic view will be assessed and compared among three groups of patients: non pregnant, pregnant with normal blood pressure, preeclampsia patients undergoing various surgeries under general anesthesia.
Tracheal intubation (TI) through direct laryngoscopy is often performed in patients to establish an airway to provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation, and/or to protect the airway from aspiration of oral and pharyngeal secretions. Difficult intubation occurs due to insufficient vision of the larynx during direct laryngoscopy. Some constraints such as full stomach and aspiration risk, unknown past medical and allergy history may make the actual number of difficult intubation in operating room. It seems that, to prevent complications due to repeated attempt for intubation (arrythmia, hypoxia, …), early detection of probable difficult laryngoscopy cases is of great importance in the operating room. Therefore, various screening methods and scales have been defined in this regard . Cormack-Lehane classification and Mallampati are among screening methods that is used to predict difficult airway and laryngoscopy cases; However, all have considerable limitations . Therefore, the search for a simple, non-invasive technique that provides a more accurate assessment of the patient's airway still continues. The ideal method is expected to be fast, accessible, simple and non-invasive .Today, portable ultrasound devices are widely available in OR and recently studies have focused on its capabilities in terms of airway management . At present, airway ultrasonography is not yet used as a common method for airway assessment. Although several parameters of airway ultrasound have been mentioned in various studies as difficult airway prediction indicators, research is still ongoing to obtain easy and accurate measures . Therefore, this study performed to investigate the relationship between some upper airway ultrasound assessment parameters with difficult laryngoscopy / difficult intubation in pregnant and preeclamptic females and aim to use these parameters to assist physician to decide about difficult laryngoscopy/ difficult intubation and consider as predictors beside the traditional methods.
The first step in airway management is the assessment of various airway indices. Various anatomical and physiological factors place pregnant females at greater risk of airway management complications and difficult intubation. Hypertensive conditions of pregnancy are associated with aggravated changes in the airway, including a narrower upper airway compared with healthy pregnant females. In routine clinical practice, quick and easy bedside assessments are performed pre-operatively to evaluate the airway. These methods have high interobserver variability and only fair to moderate sensitivity and specificity. The role of ultrasound in airway assessment is encouraging as anatomical structures can be visualised in supraglottic, glottis and subglottic views. With the development of better probes, high resolution imaging, real-time pictures and clinical experience, In this prospective study, we assessed the airway indices of non-pregnant, normotensive pregnant and preeclamptic pregnant females using both clinical parameters and ultrasonographic assessment.
882 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 237 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 163 across 380 observational studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.
Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →South Valley University is the lead sponsor of 147 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
non pregnant, normotensive pregnant and preeclamptic patients who are undergoing general anesthesia, and also apply to the inclusion criteria and have non of the exclusion criteria mentioned above.
Exclusion Criteria:
non pregnant patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
pregnant normotensive patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
preeclampsia patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
Sperficial ultrasonographic airway assessemt
By using superficial ultrasound probe, we measure in millimeters: anterior neck skin to hyoid bone distance, anterior neck skin to vocal cord distance (ANS-VC) ,distance from the epiglottis to the midpoint of the distance between the vocal cords (E-VC),the depth of pre-epiglottic space (Pre-E) and Pre-E/E-VC ratio). All parameters will be measured in millimeters in all groups by the same doctor, and the same ultrasound device.
Time frame: preoperative just before induction of anesthesia
Assessment of laryngoscopic view
In all groups, we assess laryngoscopic view of airway using Cormack-Lehane classification system. Grade 1: Full view of the glottis (entire vocal cords and anterior commissure visible); intubation is straightforward. Grade 2: Partial glottic view; subdivided into 2a (posterior vocal cords visible) and 2b (only arytenoids seen); intubation often possible with manipulation. Grade 3: Only epiglottis visible, no glottis; intubation typically requires advanced techniques. Grade 4: Epiglottis not visible; predicts failed intubation, needing alternatives.
Time frame: preoperative just before endotracheal intubation
Tongue thickness
By using deep ultrasound probe, we measure tongue thickness
Time frame: Once just before induction of general anesthesia
Hyoid bone visibility
By using deep ultrasound probe, we measure hyoid bone visibility(HBV)
Time frame: Preoperative just before induction of anesthesia
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
South Valley University