CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07417943Updated Apr 22, 2026

Neuromodulation to Enhance Motor Function in HSP

An interventional study of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia, sponsored by Rahul Sachdeva. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Rahul Sachdeva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a rare neurological condition that causes stiffness, weakness, and difficulty walking due to damage in the nerves that control movement. This study will test whether a noninvasive form of spinal cord stimulation, called transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), can improve walking and reduce muscle stiffness in adults with HSP.

In this study, participants will receive tSCS twice a week for 8 weeks. The stimulation is delivered through self-adhesive electrodes placed on the skin over the lower back and does not require surgery. Each session will last about one hour. After the treatment period, participants will be followed for an additional 8 weeks without stimulation to see whether any improvements are maintained. Researchers will measure walking speed, walking endurance, muscle stiffness, and overall disease severity. Additional tests will explore changes in bladder and bowel function and muscle strength.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
03

In context

Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 25 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary.

Browse Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Rahul Sachdeva as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia (genetic confirmation if available).
  • Stable medications for spasticity and other neurologic symptoms for =4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Able to participate in study visits and assessments with or without assistive devices.
  • If ambulatory: able to walk at least 10 meters with or without an assistive device.
  • If wheelchair user: able to perform seated mobility tasks and transfers required for assessments.
  • Capacity to provide informed consent and follow study procedures, with an ability to communicate and understand instructions in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, intrathecal pumps).
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease that would make participation unsafe.
  • Open skin lesions or severe dermatologic conditions at electrode sites.
  • Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant during the intervention period.
  • Diagnosed with Primary Lateral Sclerosis (PLS) or another neurological condition that affects walking, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), or a recent surgery on legs.
  • Unable to participate in basic movement or mobility assessments, even with their usual mobility device (such as a wheelchair, walker, or cane). People who use wheelchairs or other mobility aids can participate if they can complete the study's mobility assessments in their usual way.
  • Cognitive or psychiatric conditions that make it difficult to give informed consent or follow study instructions.
  • Diagnosed with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), either acute or ongoing, before or at the time of study enrollment.
  • Diagnosed with epilepsy.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that could affect mobility or spasticity during the study.
  • A recent change (within the last 4 weeks) in medications or treatments that affect spasticity or movement (for example: baclofen, tizanidine, botulinum toxin injections).
  • Expect to start or change treatments for spasticity or mobility during the study period.
  • Any condition judged by the investigator to pose excess risk or confound outcomes.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

    Participants will undergo 16 transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) sessions over 8 weeks

    Device: transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicetranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

    a non-invasive spinal neuromodulation system will deliver stimulation as high-frequency pulsed current using frequencies within a predefined range

    Also known as: SCONE

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

    10MWT assesses walking speed over a 10-meter walkway at a comfortable and maximum safe pace. Timing occurs between 2 and 8 meters to exclude acceleration/deceleration, with two trials averaged per speed. Assistive devices are allowed

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  2. Change in 6- Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    6MWT evaluates walking endurance by measuring the total distance walked over six minutes. Patients are instructed to walk as far as possible at their own pace, with rests allowed if needed. The total distance reflects functional capacity and stamina, which are often affected in HSP due to progressive spasticity and weakness.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 16

  3. Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    measures muscle spasticity by assessing resistance to passive muscle stretch through the range of motion and grades the muscle tone on a 0-4 scale based on the resistance felt. MAS 0-4 scale: 0: No increased muscle tone 1: Slight increase in tone; catch and release at the end of the range 1+ : Slight increase; catch followed by minimal resistance through \< half the range 2: More marked increase through most of the range, but the limb still moves easily 3: Considerable increase in tone; passive movement is difficult 4: Limb is rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  4. Change in Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS)

    The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) is a validated clinical outcome measure used to assess disease severity in individuals with spastic paraplegia. The scale consists of 13 items evaluating gait, spasticity, muscle strength, coordination, and functional impairment. Each item is scored to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 52, where a score of 0 indicates no neurological disability and higher scores reflect increasing severity of impairment, with 52 representing the most severe disease manifestation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in HSP- Self Notion and Perception (HSP-SNAP) questionnaire

    HSP-SNAP is a questionnaire used to assess the self-perception of individuals diagnosed with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). HSP-SNAP includes 12 questions, with 2 items dedicated to each symptom dimension (stiffness, weakness, imbalance, reduced endurance, fatigue, and pain). Each pair of items for a given dimension includes both positive and negative responses to prevent automatic answers. The HSP-SNAP employs a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). To account for both positive and negative items, scoring is as follows: for items with a positive tone, the score is calculated as "patient's score minus 1" (pt score-1); for negative items, the score is "5 minus the patient's score" (5-pt score). The overall score is the sum of all item scores, ranging from 0 to 48. A higher score indicates better well-being and milder symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  2. Change in Joint Kinematics via Three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis

    3D Gait Analysis will be performed using a 14-camera motion capture system, a wireless Electromyography (EMG) system, and 3 in-ground force plates. We will track walking speed using timing gates. Wireless EMG sensors will be placed on the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and vastus medialis to assess muscle activation during the gait trials. The outcomes will include joint kinematics (hip, knee, and ankle,).

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  3. Change in Sit-to-stand test

    Participants will be asked to perform a sit-to-stand task, whereby they will be told to stand up and sit down on a stool at their own self-selected pace. Sit-to-Stand performance, measured as the time and kinematic characteristics of sit-to-stand transition (average of two trials) obtained using motion capture analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  4. Change in Bilateral isometric knee strength

    Bilateral isometric knee strength will be obtained with three, 5-sec maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) separated by one-minute rest. Knee strength, measured as peak knee extensor torque obtained using isokinetic dynamometry (Biodex), expressed in Newton-meters (Nm), with higher values indicating greater muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  5. Change in knee pain

    Knee pain during knee strength test is recorded on an 11-point visual analog scale (0=no pain and 10 most pain possible).

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)

    The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess lower urinary tract symptoms in individuals with neurogenic bladder. The questionnaire evaluates symptom severity across three domains, including incontinence, storage and voiding symptoms, and bladder-related consequences, as well as a global quality-of-life item. Individual items are scored on ordinal response scales, and summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 74, with higher scores indicating greater urinary symptom severity and impact on daily functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

  2. Change in Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score (NBD Score)

    The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) is a validated clinical questionnaire used to assess the severity and impact of bowel dysfunction in individuals with neurological conditions, including spinal cord injury. The instrument evaluates multiple domains of bowel function, including frequency of defecation, constipation, fecal incontinence, use of medication or mechanical assistance, and impact on quality of life. Individual item scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating more severe bowel dysfunction and greater impact on daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16.

  3. Change in Metabolic/protein profiling

    Approximately 10 mL of venous blood samples will be collected and processed for metabolomic/lipid profiling and biomarker assays

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 16

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant outcomes data will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07417943
Lead sponsor
Rahul Sachdeva
Collaborators
Spastic Paraplegia Foundation
Responsible party
Rahul Sachdeva (Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2026
Start date
Apr 9, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Rahul Sachdeva, PhD
Contact
rahulsachdeva@uky.edu
8592574888
Rahul Sachdeva, PhD
principal investigator · University of Kentucky

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion