ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07414901Updated Jul 9, 2026

Group Postpartum and Well-Child Care for Maternal and Infant Health

An interventional study of Group Care in Postpartum Health and Infant Health, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Recruiting at 16 sites in Malawi. Open to participants aged 1 Week to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-09.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Week to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study will evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated group postpartum and well-child care model, compared to individual (usual) postnatal and well-child care, on maternal and child health outcomes. Results will provide clinical evidence for improved maternal and infant health care in the first year postpartum. The study will inform and provide lessons learned to advance maternal and infant health service delivery models in low resource settings.

Read the detailed description

A cluster randomized controlled trial design with mixed methods will be used to determine the impact and comparative effectiveness of group versus usual individual care with postpartum women and the women's infants in 16 clinics across Zomba District, Malawi. Data is collected at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Women are nested within the postpartum/well-child care group for the intervention. In the control arm, dyads will be grouped based on order of entry within each site. The first 10 dyads will form "group" 1, the second 10 dyads "group" 2, etc. The investigators will also explore the health and health-related social needs that arise in the 12 months after birth for both women and the women's infants through in-depth interviews as well as implementation barriers and facilitators for group postpartum and well-child care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postpartum Health
  • Infant Health
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Week to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Aims 1\&2:

  • Women presenting for their 1-week postnatal care visit with their infant at a study site clinic.
  • Over age 15.
  • One infant is less than 4 weeks old.
  • Able to speak and understand Chichewa.
  • Adolescents 15-17 must bring parent/guardian for consent/assent. Infants included as part of mother-infant dyad.

Aim 3:

  • Midwife or HSA serving as group care co-facilitator or key stakeholders in MoH/Zomba District/clinical administration
  • Able to speak Chichewa and/or English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Aim 1\&2

  • Under age 15.
  • Serious physical or mental illness or marked cognitive impairment preventing .
  • Inability to participate in full intervention
  • Multiple infants (e.g. twins, triplets)

Aim 3

-Serious physical or mental illness or marked cognitive impairment preventing informed consent.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group Care

    Behavioral: Group Care

  • No intervention
    Usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralGroup Care

    Group care in the postpartum period brings the same group of 8-10 women and their infants, born within one month of one another, together for one year of integrated healthcare for the dyad. Sessions are co-facilitated by a midwife and HSA. Each session is 120 minutes: first 30-45 minutes consist of self-assessments (measuring infant's weight/length, taking own vital signs) and standard health assessments by a clinician; health concerns are identified/managed and referrals made if needed. Followed by 75-90 minutes of interactive health promotion, skills-building, and support activities. 6-visit model aligned with Malawian vaccine schedule: 6 weeks, 10 weeks, 14 weeks, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postpartum depression score as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

    The EPDS is a 10-item self-report scale with scores ranging from 0-30; higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  2. Infant immunization completion rate per national immunization schedule

    Time frame: 6 months, and 12 months after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants using a family planning method

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months postpartum

  2. Number of Participants who recall postnatal care content as measured by structured survey

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months postpartum

  3. Self-reported peer connectedness as measured by study survey

    Peer connectedness assessed via a 14-item survey. Total score range: 0-56. Higher scores indicate greater peer connectedness.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months postpartum

  4. Breastfeeding self-efficacy as measured by the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF)

    The BSES-SF is a 14-item self-report scale with a total score range of 14-70. Higher scores indicate greater breastfeeding self-efficacy.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months postpartum

  5. Number of Participants Exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months after birth

    Time frame: 6 months postpartum

  6. Partner communication as measured by relationship quality survey

    2-item survey with total score range 0-2. Higher scores indicate higher relationship quality.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  7. Maternal nutrition as measured by dietary diversity survey

    Dietary diversity assessed via 6-item 24-hour recall with a total score range of 0-6. Higher scores indicate greater dietary diversity.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  8. Maternal anemia - hemoglobin level measured by point-of-care bloodspot test

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months postpartum

  9. Hypertension as measured by blood pressure assessment

    Hypertension assessed by systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurement in mmHg. Hypertension defined as systolic ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg per WHO guidelines.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  10. Postpartum anxiety as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the GAD-7, a 7-item self-report scale with a total score range of 0-21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  11. Maternal mortality as measured by clinic reporting

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months postpartum

  12. Infant growth as measured by weight-for-age per growth standards

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after birth

  13. Infant growth as measured by length-for-age per growth standards

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months after birth

  14. Infant nutritional status as measured by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after birth

  15. Infant anemia as measured by point-of-care hemoglobin bloodspot test

    Time frame: 12 months after birth

  16. Child development as measured by the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT)

    Child development assessed using the MDAT, a tool measuring four domains: gross motor, fine motor, language, and social development. Each domain is scored 0-34 based on passed items. Total score range: 0-136. Higher scores indicate more advanced development.

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after birth

  17. Infant mortality as measured by clinic reporting and parent's self-report

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after birth

07

Study locations

8 of 16 sites recruiting
  • Bimbi HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Chamba HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Chingale HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Domasi HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Lambulira HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Likangala HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • M'mambo HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Machinjiri HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Maera HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Makwapala
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Matawale HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Mwandama HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Naisi HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Namasalima HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Recruiting
  • Nasawa
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
  • Ngwelero HC
    Zomba, Malawi
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2029, 44 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
StartActual
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 30, 2030
Last update
Jul 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07414901
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), University of Michigan, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 9, 2026

Study contacts

Ashley Gresh
Contact
ashley.gresh@jhu.edu
603-831-3942
Ellen Chirwa
Contact
embweza@kuhes.ac.mw
+265888940513
Ashley Gresh
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion