ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07413224Updated Apr 8, 2026

Qualitative Effects of AEF0217 in Down Syndrome People

An observational study in Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), sponsored by Aelis Farma. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by Aelis Farma · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
28
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Following the AEF0217-102 trial (NCT05748405), which investigated the effects of AEF0217 versus placebo, participants with Down syndrome and their caregivers who took part in the trial are invited to share their perceptions of what they experienced or observed, in an exploratory manner.

This qualitative study collects information through a specific questionnaire developed for this purpose.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-interventional, follow-up, cross-sectional, mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) study.

Participants and their caregivers who will be enrolled are those who have received either AEF0217 or placebo and who have completed the previous trial.

The participant and their cargiver will be contacted prospectively to assess their interest in participating in the study.

The participant and their caregiver will sign an electronic informed consent form and will receive a link to a questionnaire developed using EU Survey to be completed.

Data will be collected at a single time point but may refer retrospectively to past experiences related to the previous trial. Data from all participants and caregivers who complete the questionnaire will be included in the analysis.

Given the observational and descriptive nature of the study, the quantitative analysis will be primarily descriptive.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles derived from the Declaration of Helsinki (75th General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, October 2024).

In addition, the study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR), and the regulatory requirements applicable at the study site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Down Syndrome

438 studies on the registry are indexed under Down Syndrome; 99 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 158 across 145 observational studies indexed under Down Syndrome.

Browse Down Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Aelis Farma is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Caregivers and participants who have participated and completed the RCT AEF0217-201 (NCT 05748405)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants having completed the trial AEF0217-102
  2. Being the caregiver of the participant
  3. Provided written (or assent in case of individuals with Down syndrome with no capacity to legally sign the consent)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1- Not wanting to provide a written

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group AEF0217

    Participants who received AEF0217 in the previous trial AEF0217-102

  • Group Placebo

    Participants who received Placebo in the previous trial AEF0217-102

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. - Overall, how would the caregiver describe the experience with the effect of the treatment the participant received during the trial?

    * Rating of the global perception of the treatment period (Likert scale). Scale in 5 points (Very positive, Somewhat positive, Neutral, Somewhat negative, Very negative). * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Overall, how the study satisfied the effects the caregiver was expecting in the participant after receiving the treatment??

    * Rating of the global perception of the treatment period (Likert scale). Scale in 5 points (Very positive, Somewhat positive, Neutral, Somewhat negative, Very negative) * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Which treatment does the caregiver believe the participant received before knowing the actual assignment (active drug or placebo)

    * Rating Scale in 3 points (AEF0217, Placebo, I am not sure) * completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Was the caregiver's assumption about the treatment allocation correct?

    * Rating Scale in 2 points Yes or No * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. If the caregiver noticed an improvement what type of changes did the caregiver observe after the end of the treatment period?

    Rating as follows: * The improvement continued up to this day * The improvement continued for some time and then started to decline * The improvement remained stable up to this day * The improvement remained stable for some time and then started to decline * The improvement started to decline shortly after the end of the treatment * After the decline the function returned to and stabilized at the level prior to the study * After the decline the functioning becomes progressively worse than the level prior to the study. Percentage calculated. \- Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Ability to manage personal needs: eating, dressing, bathing, hygiene

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Enrolment day

  6. Ability to carry out household responsibilities, such as cleaning up, completing chores, and preparing food

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Improvement in his/her engagement in structured activities or as a student, an apprentice or in his/her paid job

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Improvement in his/her ability to adapt to new situations

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Improvement in his/her ability to handle responsibilities

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Improvement in his/her ability to face challenges and stress

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Improvement in his/her ability to apply numerical concepts in everyday situations, such as understanding time, dates, and handling of money (cash)

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Improvement his/her ability to navigate life outside the home, as for example have an improved safety awareness and use of transportation

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  13. Ability to relate and interact with others

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  14. Ability to maintain and develop relationships

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  15. He/she is more empathic

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  16. Increased activity in participating in recreational activities with others

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  17. Improvement in adapting to new various social situations

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  18. Ability to take part in a conversation/communication

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  19. He/she listens more attentively and/or responds more appropriately

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  20. Understand better spoken and nonverbal information

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  21. Can better express needs, thoughts, and emotions using verbal language

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  22. Write more often and/or use better grammar and/or spelling

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  23. Reads and better understand texts.

    * Amplitude of the observed changes * Rating: numeric score from 0 to 10 with "0" = No improvement at all and "10" = Very marked improvement * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  24. Thinking about the participant's abilities while taking the treatment, what changes (if any) did the caregiver notice?

    * Qualitative (open text) * Thematic analysis to identify perceived domains of change and salient themes * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  25. In the caregiver's opinion, what impact did the changes, if any, had on the participant's wellbeing and the day-to-day activities of the family?

    * Qualitative (open text) * Qualitative coding will be performed independently by two researchers using NVivo 15 (or similar). Discrepancies will be resolved through consensus discussions. Themes will be validated through iterative review and triangulated with quantitative findings to ensure coherence. • Thematic analysis to identify perceived domains of change and salient themes * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  26. In the caregiver's opinion, what impact did the changes, if any, have on the participant's interaction with others in the social ?

    * Qualitative (open text) * Thematic analysis to identify perceived domains of change and salient themes * Completed by the caregiver

    Time frame: Day 1

  27. Does the participant remember the effects of the treatment with AEF0217?

    * Binary variable: Yes or no * Completed by the participant with Down Syndrome

    Time frame: Day 1

  28. Did the participant notice any change to the better in abilities or behaviors after participating in the AEF0217 study?

    * Only if the question 28 is answered "Yes" * Rated using a 4 levels scale (Big changes, Some changes, No change, Worsening) * Completed by the participant with Down Syndrome

    Time frame: Day 1

  29. If the participant observed changes, in which areas did they happen ?

    * Only if the question 29 is answered "big changes" or some changes" * Rated using a multiple-choice question (more than one answer is possible) * My abilities to understand * My ability to speak * My ability to write * My ability to concentrate * My ability to pay attention * My ability to control my behavior * My abilities to learn at school * My ability to take care of myself * My ability to interact with others * My ability to perform my daily abilities * My ability to execute my job * Completed by the participant with Down Syndrome

    Time frame: Day 1

  30. Does the participant think the treatment helped daily life ?

    * Only if the question 29 is answered "big changes" or some changes" * Rated using a 4 levels scale (Yes, a lot/Yes, a little/Not really/I don't know) * Completed by the participant with Down Syndrome

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07413224
Lead sponsor
Aelis Farma
Collaborators
Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Pier Vincenzo Piazza, MD, PhD
study director · Aelis Farma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion