ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07409896IANB SIP EPTUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy OF 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IANB) Block Versus Primary Buccal Infilteration With 4% Articaine in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis(SIP) IN Mandibular First Molars

An interventional study of INTERVENTION 1: 2% Lignocaine 1:80,000 epinephrine and INTERVENTION 2 : 4%Articaine 1:100,000 epinephrine in Anesthetic Efficacy, sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Updated Oct 27, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lignocaine administered through an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in one group of participants with 4% articaine delivered via primary buccal infiltration in other group in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molars.

Read the detailed description

This single-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluates the comparative anesthetic efficacy of two routinely used local anesthetic techniques for mandibular first molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 2% lidocaine is a standard but technique-sensitive approach with reported failure rates of 20-25%, often influenced by anatomical variations and pulpal inflammation. Primary buccal infiltration with 4% articaine has emerged as a promising alternative due to superior bone penetration and favorable clinical outcomes in several studies, though evidence in adult South Asian populations remains limited.

A total of 330 systemically healthy adults (ASA I, aged 18-55 years) meeting strict diagnostic criteria for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized into two groups:

  • Group 1: 2% lidocaine (1:80,000 epinephrine) via IANB
  • Group 2: 4% articaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) via primary buccal infiltration

All injections will be standardized to 1.8 mL delivered over 60 seconds using 27-gauge needles by a single experienced clinician. Topical anesthesia with benzocaine 20% will be used prior to injection. Dental anxiety will be screened using Corah's DAS, and patients with high or phobic anxiety scores will be excluded.

Fifteen minutes after administration, soft-tissue anesthesia will be confirmed (lip numbness for IANB and buccal probe response for infiltration). Pulpal anesthesia will be objectively assessed using an electric pulp tester (EPT) and subjectively using the Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at multiple treatment stages: baseline, post-injection, access preparation, pulp chamber entry, and root canal instrumentation.

Anesthetic success will be defined as:

  • Two consecutive non-responsive EPT readings (max output 80)
  • Mild or no pain during the procedure (VAS \<55 mm)

Failure will be recorded if moderate/severe pain (VAS ≥55 mm) occurs at any stage or supplemental anesthesia is required.

The study aims to determine whether 4% articaine buccal infiltration can provide anesthetic efficacy equal to or superior to 2% lidocaine IANB for endodontic treatment of symptomatic mandibular first molars. The findings may help refine local anesthetic protocols and reduce the need for supplemental injections in challenging pulpal conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthetic Efficacy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy patients classified as , aged 18-55 years.
  • Permanent mandibular first molar tooth requiring endodontic therapy.
  • Diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis without swelling or sinus.
  • Normal periapical radiographic appearance (no evidence of periapical pathology).
  • Moderate pain as assessed by the Heft-Parker VAS (>54 mm and \<114 mm).
  • Lingering pain or prolonged response to cold testing (lasting more than 10 seconds).
  • Positive response to electric pulp testing.
  • Outcome assessed must be pulpal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Pregnant or lactating mothers.

      • Teeth with reversible pulpitis, previously treated, or with calcified canals.
      • Teeth with severe periodontal disease or periapical radiolucency.
      • Patients who have taken analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs within 6 hours before the treatment visit.
      • Patients on medications that could potentially interact with the anesthetic solution (e.g., antihypertensives, anticoagulants).
      • History of allergy to 4% articaine, lidocaine, or epinephrine.
      • Systemic diseases, states, or significant anxiety/mental health disorders.
      • History of vasovagal syncope on local anesthetic administration
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
330 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ARM 1 : 2%Lignocaine 1:80,000 epinephrine

    : 2% Lignocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) Participants in this group will receive an inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% Lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine.

    Other: INTERVENTION 1: 2% Lignocaine 1:80,000 epinephrine

  • Active comparator
    ARM 2 : 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

    Participants in this group will receive 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at the site of the mandibular first molar.

    Other: INTERVENTION 2 : 4%Articaine 1:100,000 epinephrine

Interventions

  • OtherINTERVENTION 1: 2% Lignocaine 1:80,000 epinephrine

    2% Lignocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) : Participants in this group will receive an inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% Lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. The injection will be administered following standard IANB technique for mandibular first molars. The anesthetic efficacy will be assessed with 2 consecutive non responsive readings on EPT objectivelt and via Heft-Parker VAS not more than ≥55 .

  • OtherINTERVENTION 2 : 4%Articaine 1:100,000 epinephrine

    Participants in this group will receive a buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at the site of the mandibular first molar. The injection will follow standard buccal infiltration technique. Anesthetic efficacy will be evaluated during endodontic treatment using the same pain assessment method as Arm 1.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anesthetic efficacy

    Description: Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups . Group 1: 2%Lignocaine 1;80,000 epinephrine 1.8 ml IANB Group 2: 4%Articaine 1:100,000 epinephrine 1.8 ml Primary buccal infilteration Efficacy will be considered if there are 2 consecutive non-responsive readings during 60 mins duration , usually measured on EPT 15 mins after administration of anesthesia . Any pain felt during the procedure will be measured according to Heft-Parker VAS and moderate-severe pain reported (VAS ≥ 55) will be regarded unsuccessful . Time Frame: 1 hour after administration of local anesthetic agent .

    Time frame: 1 hour after administration of anesthetic agent

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of anesthesia

    Description: Duration up to which Lignocaine IANB/Articaine Primary Buccal Infilteration remains successful after administration . Time Frame: 1 hour 30 mins

    Time frame: 1 hour 30 mins

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared because the study does not include plans or infrastructure for secure long term data storage, de-identification, and controlled access needed to protect participants privacy .Additionally, the data sheet is small and disclosure may include the risk of re-identification, summary results will be made available as required.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2026→Nov 20, 2026
Oct 27, 2026
Study completion
Aug 20, 2026→Dec 20, 2026
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Primary completion Aug 1, 2026→Nov 20, 2026
    Study completion Aug 20, 2026→Dec 20, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07409896
Lead sponsor
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan
Responsible party
Sadia Shehzadi (Dr. Sadia Shehzadi, Armed Forces Post Graduate Medical Institute (AFPGMI), Rawalpindi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
Start date
Mar 20, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Sadia Shehzadi Dr. Sadia Shehzadi, BDS,FCPS(PG3)
Contact
sadiashehzadi321@gmail.com
03342073051

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion