CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06806202Updated Feb 3, 2025

Warm Versus Conventional 2% Lignocaine for IANB Efficacy

A Phase 2 interventional study of conventional 2% lignocaine at room temperature and pre-warmed 2% lignocaine at 42°C in Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-03.

Sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study compares the anesthetic efficacy of warm versus conventional 2% lignocaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular molars, evaluating success rates and onset time.

Read the detailed description

The study will be conducted following approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Committee, AFID (ANX "A"). A total of 200 eligible patients visiting the Operative Dentistry Department at the Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry will be invited to participate. The procedure will be explained to the patients in Urdu, and written informed consent will be obtained (ANX "B").

Patients will be screened for eligibility through medical history, clinical examination, necessary tests, and peri-apical radiographs. Those meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two groups using a scientific random number table.

Group 1: Patients will receive conventional 2% lignocaine (at room temperature).

Group 2: Patients will receive pre-warmed 2% lignocaine (at 42°C). Root canal treatment will begin after the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is administered. 1.8 mL of the local anesthetic will be delivered over 60 seconds using a 27-gauge needle. The first investigator will randomize participants by having them choose one of two differently colored balls to determine which anesthetic preparation (conventional or pre-warmed) they will receive. The conventional 2% lignocaine will be commercially available 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:200,000 epinephrine, while the pre-warmed solution will be heated in a thermostatically controlled water bath or feeder bottle warmer (Philips AVENT) to 42°C.

The second investigator, who will be blinded to group allocation, will evaluate pain immediately after the block is administered by asking patients to rate their discomfort on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The onset of anesthesia will also be measured by performing gingival probing every 15 seconds. After rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation will be performed, and pulp therapy will be initiated by the first investigator. The pulp therapy will be completed as needed, and the teeth will be restored with light-cured composite resin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Permanent teeth with acutely inflamed pulp without swelling or draining sinus.
  • Patient who have carious mandibular molars.
  • Patients of either gender aged between 18-50 years old.
  • Systemically healthy patients.
  • Patients who agree to attend for recall appointments and provide a written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on preoperative analgesics and antibiotics.
  • Teeth with calcified canals and previously treated teeth.
  • Pregnant and lactating mothers.
  • Patients who are immunocompromised, anxious and mentally handicapped.
  • Patients who are allergic to lignocaine.
  • Non-vital or necrosed teeth.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    conventional

    Group 1: Patients receive conventional 2% lignocaine at room temperature.

    Drug: conventional 2% lignocaine at room temperature

  • Active comparator
    warm (42 celsius)

    Group 2: Patients receive pre-warmed 2% lignocaine at 42°C

    Drug: pre-warmed 2% lignocaine at 42°C

Interventions

  • Drugconventional 2% lignocaine at room temperature

    This study aims to compare the effectiveness of warm 2% lignocaine (lidocaine) versus conventional room temperature 2% lignocaine for achieving successful inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) in mandibular permanent molars

  • Drugpre-warmed 2% lignocaine at 42°C

    This study aims to compare the effectiveness of warm 2% lignocaine (lidocaine) versus conventional room temperature 2% lignocaine for achieving successful inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) in mandibular permanent molars

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain during administration of injection

    Pain during administration of injection with 2% conventional and warm lignocaine on visual analogue scale is assessed. Visual Analog Scale, which is a tool used to measure a patient's perception of pain. It typically consists of a line, often 10 cm long, where one end represents "no pain" and the other end represents "worst possible pain." The patient marks a point on the line that corresponds to their level of pain. The distance from the "no pain" end to the point marked by the patient is then measured, usually in centimeters or millimeters, to quantify the pain intensity. Visual Analog Scale is commonly used in clinical trials to assess pain during and after procedures, as it provides a simple and reliable method for evaluating pain intensity.

    Time frame: 60 seconds

  2. Onset of anesthesia in seconds

    It will be measured by gingival probing every 15 seconds till patient reports no sensation after stimulus (assessed up to 15 minutes after anesthesia application) It will be done by using both conventional and warm 2% lignocaine.

    Time frame: Every 15 seconds till patient reports no sensation after stimulus (assessed up to 15 minutes after anesthesia application)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Armed Forces Institute Of Dentistry
    Rawalpindi, Punjab 46000, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06806202
Lead sponsor
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan
Responsible party
Kanza Zafar (Dr. Kanza Zafar, Principal Investigator and Resident Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2025
Start date
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2025

Study contacts

Maha Ali Mirza, BDS
Contact
mahaalimirza5@gmail.com
00923337808809
Kanza Zafar, BDS
Contact
kanzazafar6@gmail.com
00923337808809
Kanza Ali Zafar, BDS
principal investigator · AFID

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion