ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07401706PCS BESS IPRRSUpdated Feb 10, 2026

Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation and Routine Physical Therapy in Athletes With Post Concussion Syndrome

An interventional study of Intervention 1 and Control Arm (Conventional Therapy) in Post Concussion Syndrome, sponsored by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.

Sponsored by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was conducted over six months at Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital to compare the effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation and Routine Physical Therapy on stability, kinesiophobia, and return to sports in athletes with post-concussion syndrome. A total of 34 participants aged 12 to 30 years were enrolled based on specific diagnostic criteria. Non probability convenient sampling was used, followed by random allocation into experimental and control groups through computer generated sequencing and sealed envelope concealment. Single blinding was done, with participants unaware of their assigned intervention.

The experimental group received a Vestibular Rehabilitation program consisting of balance training, habituation exercises, and gaze stabilization, while the control group underwent Routine Physical Therapy involving ankle strategies and elliptical training. Both interventions were administered for 30 minutes, three times per week, over four weeks. Outcomes were measured pre- and post-intervention using validated tools: the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) for postural stability, the Urdu version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Injury Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Scale (I-PRRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, employing appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests based on normality, with significance set at p \< 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained, informed consent was secured, and all procedures adhered to established ethical standards.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Concussion Syndrome

Keywords

  • TAMPA
  • BESS
  • IPRRS
  • RPT
  • Athletes
  • Post concussion syndrome
  • vestibular rehabilitation
  • stability
  • kinesiophobia
  • return to sports
03

In context

Post-Concussion Syndrome

141 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 34 is below the median of 52 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome.

Browse Post-Concussion Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 12 to 30 years
  2. Fulfil the criteria of post concussion syndrome as highlighted by Tator et al.(2016)which requires presence of at least 3 or more persistent symptoms from standardized list
  3. Sustained a mTBI in past 3 to 12 weeks
  4. Having ongoing symptoms from list in PCSS that started 72 hrs or less after an impact
  5. Exhibit objective deficits on standardized baseline examination enabling vestibular and ocular dysfunction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a chronic infectious disease.

    • Uncontrolled hypertension.
    • Other neurological disorders (not attributed to their primary diagnosis).
    • Cancer treatment (other than basal cell carcinoma), craniotomy, or subdural hematoma.
    • Those on long term use of psychoactive drugs that compromise their ability to perform study activities
    • Those with pacemakers or elevated cardiovascular risk.
    • Ongoing litigation surrounding their injury.
    • Have been diagnosed with a severe brain injury prior to enrollment, or their post concussive symptoms have persisted beyond 12
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vestibular Rehabilitation

    The experimental group received a structured Vestibular Rehabilitation Program that included balance training, habituation exercises, and gaze stabilization exercises. These interventions were designed to improve postural stability, reduce dizziness and motion sensitivity, and enhance visual vestibular interaction. Each session lasted 30 minutes, was conducted three times per week, and continued for a total of four weeks under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist.

    Other: Intervention 1

  • Active comparator
    Routine Physical Therapy

    The control group received Routine Physical Therapy, consisting of ankle strategy exercises to improve postural control through ankle musculature and coordination, along with elliptical training at sub-symptom threshold levels to promote aerobic conditioning. Similar to the experimental group, these sessions were performed for 30 minutes, three times per week, for four weeks, and were supervised by a licensed physical therapist.

    Other: Control Arm (Conventional Therapy)

Interventions

  • OtherIntervention 1

    Vestibular Rehabilitation includes balance training, habituation exercises, and gaze stabilization/oculomotor training. Balance training is performed 3 times per week, with intensity progressed from static stance to dynamic tasks such as foam beam and head turns. The time is three sets each for 30 seconds, making a total treatment time of 30 minutes. The type of balance training includes static balance (single-leg and tandem) and dynamic balance (foam beam walking with head turns). Habituation exercises were performed three times per week, with intensity of three sets of 100 feet distance covered while gradually increasing complexity from head turns to ball toss. The time is 3 minute activity performed following 1 minute rest, making a total treatment time of 30 minutes. The type of exercise includes VOR habituation such as head turn with ambulation, ball toss up and down while walking, and ball toss side to side while walking. Gaze stabilization/oculomotor training is also performed t

  • OtherControl Arm (Conventional Therapy)

    Routine Physical Therapy consist of ankle strategies and elliptical training. Ankle strategies are performed three times per week with intensity progressed from rocker board to dual-task activities. The time duration is three sets of two minutes with two minutes of rest, resulting in a total treatment time of 30 minutes. The type of exercise involves rocker board movements in anterior/posterior and medial/lateral directions, with or without ball toss or gaze fixation (X1 viewing). Elliptical training is also performed three times per week at mild exertion, starting at level 1 and with asymptomatic threshold. Each session includes a 5-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of training, and a 5-minute cool-down, making the total treatment time 30 minutes. The mode of exercise is submaximal aerobic exercise on an elliptical trainer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinesiophobia

    For kinesiophobia the Urdu version of Tampa scale was used to asses athletes. The Urdu version of the TSK is considered to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing kinesiophobia. 1. = strongly disagree 2. = disagree 3. = agree 4. = strongly agree Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is a self report questionnaire used to measure fear of movement. It contains 17 items, each scored on a 4-point Likert scale: Total score range: 17 to 68 Reverse scored items: 4, 8, 12, 16 (For these items: 1↔4, 2↔3)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Stability

    The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) has demonstrated excellent validity and reliability in patients. Test-retest reliability was strong, with ICC values ranging from 0.88 to 0.99 (average 0.90) and Cronbach's alpha between 0.90 and 0.99, indicating high internal consistency.Types of Errors Hands lifted off the iliac crest Opening eyes Step, stumble, or fall Moving hip into \>30° abduction Lifting forefoot or heel Remaining out of the test position for more than 5 seconds The BESS is calculated by adding one error point for each error during the six 20-second tests. Which Foot Was Tested * Left * Right (i.e., the non-dominant foot) Score Card (Number of Errors) Test Condition Firm Surface Foam Surface Double-Leg Stance (feet together) Single-Leg Stance (non-dominant foot) Tandem Stance (non-dominant foot in back) Total Scores: BESS Total:60

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Return to sports

    The Injury Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PRRS) scale was selected as it has undergone translation and validation in Dutch athletes. The instrument demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89). 0 = no confidence at all, 50 = moderate confidence, 100 = complete confidence. Rate Value My overall confidence to play is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ My confidence to play without pain is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ My confidence to give 100 percent effort is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ My confidence to not concentrate on the injury is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ My confidence in the injured body part to handle the demands of the situation is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ My confidence in my skill level/ability is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Total: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After the publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: June 2026-October 2026

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2026; primary completion for Jun 2026, 3 months later.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Post-Concussion Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2026
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
StartEst.
Mar 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 22, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 22, 2026
Last update
Feb 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07401706
Lead sponsor
Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 22, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 22, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2026

Study contacts

Tariq Shafi, Post graduation
Contact
muhammad.tariq@ubas.edu.pk
03454190056
Tariq Shafi
study chair · Lahore University of Biological And Applied Health Sciences
Syeda Farwa Aitbar, DPT
principal investigator · Lahore College of Physical Therapy
Maheen Mazhar, DPT
principal investigator · Lahore College of Physical Therapy
Ayesha Naeem Khan, DPT
principal investigator · Lahore College of Physical Therapy

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion