An interventional study of ESD in Early Gastric Cancer or Gastric Adenoma, sponsored by Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.
Sponsored by Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, ranking fifth in incidence worldwide and disproportionately affecting Asia, with China accounting for a significant share of cases and deaths. Early detection and minimally invasive treatment are critical to improving outcomes. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred curative approach for early gastric cancer, enabling precise, en bloc tumor resection while preserving gastric function. However, ESD is technically complex, time-consuming, and associated with risks such as intraoperative and delayed bleeding and perforation. These complications limit its widespread adoption, particularly outside East Asia.
Traditional ESD relies on white light imaging (WLI), which offers limited visualization of submucosal vessels and bleeding sources. Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) is an emerging image-enhanced endoscopy technology that uses specific narrow-band wavelengths to enhance the contrast of deep blood vessels and active bleeding sites by exploiting hemoglobin's optical absorption characteristics. Preliminary studies indicate that RDI improves bleeding point identification, facilitates hemostasis, and reduces endoscopists' procedural stress. However, prior research applied RDI only intermittently during bleeding events, leaving its potential benefits throughout the entire ESD procedure unexplored.
The "full-time RDI" concept proposes continuous use of RDI during all ESD stages-including submucosal injection, mucosal incision, dissection, and wound management-to enhance visualization of high-risk vessels, improve layer differentiation, and potentially reduce adverse events and operation time. Despite promising retrospective data, robust prospective evidence from large randomized controlled trials is lacking.
This multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether full-course RDI reduces major intraoperative and delayed complications and decreases unexpectedly prolonged operation times compared to conventional WLI-guided ESD in early gastric cancer. Secondary endpoints include procedural efficiency, safety across lesion locations, and operator stress.
By rigorously assessing full-time RDI's clinical value, this study addresses an urgent unmet need to improve ESD safety and efficiency, potentially broadening its application and enhancing patient outcomes. The innovation lies in integrating continuous advanced imaging throughout ESD, representing a significant advancement in endoscopic oncology and minimally invasive gastric cancer treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Full-time Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) refers to the continuous application of RDI technology throughout the entire endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure. This approach encompasses all procedural phases, including submucosal injection, circumferential mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and post-resection wound management, with the aim of enhancing visualization of submucosal vessels and bleeding sources in real time to improve hemostasis, reduce complications, and increase procedural efficiency.
Procedure: ESD
Full-time White Light Imaging (WLI) refers to the continuous use of standard white light endoscopic imaging throughout the entire endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure. This conventional approach involves relying solely on white light visualization during all stages of the procedure-including submucosal injection, mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and post-resection wound assessment-without the aid of enhanced imaging modalities for vessel or bleeding source identification.
Procedure: ESD
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique used to remove early-stage gastrointestinal tumors and precancerous lesions en bloc. Developed initially for the treatment of early gastric cancer, ESD allows for precise dissection of the submucosal layer beneath the lesion, enabling complete resection with clear margins while preserving the integrity of the surrounding tissue. This technique offers advantages over traditional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) by enabling the removal of larger and more complex lesions, reducing recurrence rates, and minimizing the need for invasive surgery.
Also known as: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
the incidence of major intraoperative or delayed adverse events and/or ESD procedures with operation time exceeding the expected duration
Major adverse events include use of hemostatic forceps for bleeding control, significant delayed bleeding, and perforation during or after ESD. Hemostatic forceps are used if bleeding persists after three electrocautery attempts or if the operator deems electrocautery insufficient. Delayed bleeding occurs mostly within 48 hours, marked by clinical signs needing hemostasis or transfusion, or \>20 g/L hemoglobin drop. Perforation is diagnosed by visible gastric wall defects or post-ESD peritoneal irritation with free gas on imaging. Expected ESD time (min) = 2.384 × tumor size (mm) + 38.568 × location (1=upper third, 0=others) + 40.333 × ulcer presence (1=yes, 0=no). Procedures exceeding 110% of this time are analyzed by lesion and specimen size.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Incidence of major intraoperative or delayed adverse events
Major adverse events include use of hemostatic forceps for bleeding control, significant delayed bleeding, and perforation during or after ESD. Hemostatic forceps are applied before lesion removal and used until bleeding is fully controlled if: (1) bleeding persists after three electrocautery attempts; (2) the operator judges electrocautery insufficient; or (3) exposed vessels cannot be controlled by electrocautery. Use is allowed if either condition (2) or (3) applies, even without (1). Delayed bleeding usually occurs within 48 hours but can last up to 2 weeks, defined by clinical signs (hypotension, tachycardia, hematemesis, melena, hematochezia) requiring endoscopic hemostasis or transfusion, or hemoglobin drop \>20 g/L. Intraoperative perforation is a visible gastric wall defect with exposed fat or peritoneal cavity; delayed perforation shows peritoneal irritation and free gas on postoperative imaging.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Incidence of ESD procedures exceeding 110% of the expected procedure time
Expected operation time = 2.384 × tumor size (mm) + 38.568 × location + 40.333 × ulcer presence; where location is assigned 1 for tumors in the upper third of the stomach and 0 for tumors in the middle or lower third; ulcer presence is assigned 1 if ulcers are present and 0 if absent. An ESD procedure is considered to exceed 110% of the expected operation time if its actual duration surpasses the estimated time by more than 10%. Analyses can be performed separately based on the preoperative estimated lesion size and the size of the resected specimen.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Number of ESD procedures requiring hemostatic forceps for hemostasis
The outcome measure reports the number of ESD procedures requiring hemostatic forceps for bleeding control. Procedures were counted as requiring hemostatic forceps if forceps were applied to achieve hemostasis during the procedure. The count ranges from zero (no procedures requiring forceps) to the total number of ESD procedures performed.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Number of hemostatic forceps uses during ESD
The outcome measure reports the number of times hemostatic forceps were used during ESD. The count ranges from zero, indicating no use of hemostatic forceps, to the maximum number of uses recorded during the procedure. A higher count reflects more frequent use of hemostatic forceps for bleeding control during ESD.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Number of hemostatic interventions during the procedure (regardless of type)
The outcome measure reports the number of hemostatic interventions performed during the procedure, regardless of the intervention type. The count ranges from zero, indicating no hemostatic intervention was required, to the maximum number of interventions recorded in a procedure. A higher count indicates more frequent hemostatic interventions to control bleeding during the procedure.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Number of spurting hemorrhages (Forrest classification Ia)
The outcome measure reports the number of spurting hemorrhages classified as Forrest Ia observed during the procedure. The count ranges from zero, indicating no spurting hemorrhages, to the maximum number identified. A higher number reflects a greater severity of active arterial bleeding according to the Forrest classification.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Procedure time (minutes) and submucosal dissection time (minutes)
Procedure time (minutes) is defined as the time from the start of mucosal incision to the complete removal of the lesion. Submucosal dissection time (minutes) is defined as the time from the completion of circumferential mucosal incision to the end of complete lesion removal. The outcome measures report time durations in minutes.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Dissection speed (mm²/min)
The outcome measure reports dissection speed in mm²/min, which is calculated by dividing the specimen area (mm²) by the submucosal dissection time (minutes). Specimen area is determined using the elliptical formula: area (mm²) = longest diameter (mm) × shortest diameter (mm) × 0.25 × 3.14. Dissection speed ranges from zero (no tissue dissected per minute) to the maximum speed recorded. Higher values indicate faster dissection during the procedure.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Volume of submucosal injection solution used
The outcome measure reports the volume of submucosal injection solution used, calculated as the initial prepared volume minus the remaining volume (measured in milliliters, ml). The volume ranges from zero, indicating no solution was used, to the maximum amount prepared. Greater volumes reflect higher usage of injection solution during the procedure.
Time frame: Throughout the ESD procedure
Rates of en bloc resection
En bloc resection is defined as the complete removal of the target lesion in a single piece without piecemeal resection. Participants are considered to have achieved this outcome if their lesions meet these criteria. Rates range from 0% (no participants achieving the outcome) to 100% (all participants achieving the outcome), with higher rates indicating better procedural success.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Rates of complete resection
Complete resection is confirmed by histological examination showing negative horizontal and vertical margins. Participants are considered to have achieved this outcome if their lesions meet these criteria. Rates range from 0% (no participants achieving the outcome) to 100% (all participants achieving the outcome), with higher rates indicating better procedural success.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Rates of curative resection
Curative resection is determined according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Guidelines, classified as endoscopic cure categories A, C-1, and C-2. Participants are considered to have achieved this outcome if their lesions meet these criteria. Rates range from 0% (no participants achieving the outcome) to 100% (all participants achieving the outcome), with higher rates indicating better procedural success.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases