ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07397624ESG-ENDOUpdated Feb 12, 2026

Endoscopic Suture Gastroplasty (ESG) for Treatment of Obese Patients With Endometrial Cancer

An observational study in Endometrial Cancer, sponsored by Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
74
Ages
21 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Obesity increases the risk of endometrial cancer, with higher Body Mass Index (BMI) leading to a significant increase in both cancer risk and recurrence. Because of the excellent cancer-specific outcomes and preponderance of obesity-related complications, women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than endometrial cancer itself. This makes an endometrial cancer diagnosis a critical moment to emphasizes the importance of actively managing the underlying issue of obesity in the endometrial cancer survivorship period.

Bariatric surgery has shown long-term benefits, including weight loss and reduction of obesity-related comorbidities, and has been linked to a decrease in endometrial cancer incidence. However, bariatric surgery has limitations, such as irreversibility and potential complications. Recent interest in less invasive methods, like bariatric endoscopy, shows promising results in achieving weight loss and improving metabolic profiles. Endoscopic procedures, such as Endomina Endoscopic suture gastroplasty (E-ESG), have shown effectiveness in weight loss and could offer a safer, more accessible alternative to surgery, in particular if associated to a lifestyle modifications program. Efficacy and safety of Bariatric endoscopy has been stressed within the recently published "Guideline of the Italian Society of Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases on Bariatric Endoscopy in the treatment of obesity and associated complications" that suggest the use of bariatric endoscopy in patients with class I obesity and in patients with class II obesity regardless of the presence of comorbidities, for the treatment of obesity.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of the E-ESG procedure in treating obesity in women after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

Read the detailed description

Obesity increases the risk of endometrial cancer, with higher BMI leading to a significant increase in both cancer risk and recurrence. Because of the excellent cancer-specific outcomes and preponderance of obesity-related complications, women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than endometrial cancer itself. This makes an endometrial cancer diagnosis a critical moment to emphasizes the importance of actively managing the underlying issue of obesity in the endometrial cancer survivorship period. Bariatric surgery has shown long-term benefits, including weight loss and reduction of obesity-related comorbidities, and has been linked to a decrease in endometrial cancer incidence. However, bariatric surgery has limitations, such as irreversibility and potential complications. Recent interest in less invasive methods, like bariatric endoscopy, shows promising results in achieving weight loss and improving metabolic profiles. Endoscopic procedures, such as Endomina Endoscopic suture gastroplasty (E-ESG), have shown effectiveness in weight loss and could offer a safer, more accessible alternative to surgery, in particular if associated to a lifestyle modifications program. Efficacy and safety of Bariatric endoscopy has been stressed within the recently published "Guideline of the Italian Society of Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases on Bariatric Endoscopy in the treatment of obesity and associated complications" that suggest the use of bariatric endoscopy in patients with class I obesity and in patients with class II obesity regardless of the presence of comorbidities, for the treatment of obesity.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of the E-ESG procedure in treating obesity in women after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Cancer
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,425 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 74 is below the median of 179 across 331 observational studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women with endometrial cancer scheduled for hysterectomy with a curative intent, with BMI ≥ 30 and Willingness to undergo E-ESG and lifestyle modifications program

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with endometrial cancer scheduled for hysterectomy with a curative intent
  • Age 21-75
  • ≥ 30
  • Willingness to undergo E-ESG and lifestyle modifications program
  • Willingness to comply with the substantial lifelong dietary restrictions required by the procedure
  • Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including signed , routine follow-up schedule, completing laboratory tests, and completing diet counseling
  • Residing within a reasonable distance from the investigator's office and able to travel to the investigator to complete all routine follow- up visits
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of foregut or gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (except uncomplicated cholecystectomy or appendectomy)
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery with sequelae, i.e., obstruction, and/or adhesive peritonitis or known abdominal adhesions
  • Prior open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery
  • Prior surgery of any kind on the esophagus, stomach, or any type of hiatal hernia surgery
  • Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract including severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, gastric ulceration, duodenal ulceration, cancer or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease
  • Potential upper gastrointestinal bleeding conditions such as esophageal or gastric varices, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasis, or other congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract such as atresia or stenoses
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, history of premalignant gastric lesions (advanced atrophic gastritis), history of familial and non-familial adenomatous syndromes
  • A gastric mass or gastric polyps > 1 cm in size
  • A hiatal hernia > 4 cm of axial displacement of the z-line above the diaphragm or severe or intractable gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms
  • A structural abnormality in the esophagus or pharynx such as a stricture or diverticulum that could impede passage of the endoscope
  • Achalasia or any other severe esophageal motility disorder
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Subjects with any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy
  • Motility disorders of the GI tract such as gross esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis, or intractable constipation
  • Hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis
  • Use of an intragastric device prior to this study due to the increased thickness of the stomach wall preventing effective suturing
  • Active psychological issues preventing participation in a life-style modification program as determined by a psychologist
  • Patients unwilling to participate in an established medically supervised diet and behavior modification program, with routine medical follow-up
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to take prescribed proton pump inhibitor medication
  • Patients receiving daily prescribed treatment with high dose aspirin (> 80 mg daily), anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, or other gastric irritants
  • Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Subjects with Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious organic disease which might include known history of coronary artery disease, Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs
  • Subjects taking medications on specified hourly intervals that may be affected by changes to gastric emptying, such as anti-seizure or anti-arrhythmic medications
  • Subjects who are taking , , and narcotics
  • Subjects who are taking diet pills
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or unstable coronary artery disease
  • Pre-existing respiratory disease such as moderate or severe (COPD) requiring steroids, pneumonia, or cancer
  • Diagnosis of connective tissue disorder (e.g., lupus, erythematosus, scleroderma) or immunocompromised
  • Specific diagnosed genetic disorder such as Prader Willi syndrome
  • Eating disorders including night eating syndrome (NES), bulimia, binge eating disorder, or compulsive overeating
  • Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight such as uncontrolled hypothyroidism
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
74 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the feasibility of E-ESG procedure in obese patients with endometrial cancer.

    Absolute and relative frequency of patients with technical success of E-ESG procedure, reported with relative 95% Confidence Interval

    Time frame: up to 4 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of patients who refused E-ESG procedure

    Evaluation of the number and percentage of women with endometrial cancer and obese who refused E-ESG procedure

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  2. Evaluation of patients who refused E-ESG procedure

    Description with absolute and relative frequencies of baseline characteristics of women with endometrial cancer and obese who refused E-ESG procedure

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  3. Evaluation of E-ESG safety in obese endometrial cancer patients.

    Absolute and relative frequencies of adverse events

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  4. To evaluate efficacy of E-ESG effects on obesity-associated comorbidities.

    Evaluation of % Excess weight loss (EWL) with the formula (Weight loss)/ (Excess weight at T0) x 100 and %TBWL(total body weight loss) with the formula (weight loss) / (weight at T0) x 100 in enrolled patients at 1 year

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  5. Evaluation of percentage of patients that reach a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of more than 25% and total body weight loss (TBWL) of more than 5% maintained at 1 year (52 weeks) in E-ESG and lifestyle modifications group

    Absolute and relative frequencies of patients that reach a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of more than 25% and a total body weight loss (TBWL) of more than 5% maintained at 1 year (52 weeks)

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  6. To evaluate the change of metabolic serum biomarkers in E-ESG patients

    Mean or median difference between baseline values of metabolic serum biomarkers and 52 weeks (T1), and 156 weeks (T2)

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  7. To evaluate the change of gut microbiota

    Microbial levels will be described as mean or median, reporting differences in levels ad different time points

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  8. To evaluate Overall Survival in E-ESG

    Overall survival will be defined as time between E-ESG and death from any cause or end of follow up, whichever cames first. Data will be described as median survival and interquartile range (IQR) calculated with Kaplan-Meyer method

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  9. To evaluate Disease Free Survival n E-ESG

    Overall survival will be defined as time between E-ESG and disease progression or death from any cause or end of follow up, whichever cames first. Data will be described as median survival and interquartile range (IQR) calculated with Kaplan-Meyer method

    Time frame: up to 4 years

  10. To evaluate Recurrence rate in E-ESG

    Disease recurrence rate at the end of follow up will be reported as absolute and relative frequency

    Time frame: up to 4 years

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 47 months after the start.

Of 130 non-industry observational studies under Endometrial Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 105 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 206. This study's planned 47 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 150 studies reached it within 105 months; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 207.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2026
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
StartActual
Jan 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Feb 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07397624
Lead sponsor
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 8, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Stefano Realdon, MD
Contact
stefano.realdon@cro.it
0434659152

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion