ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07384832Updated Apr 14, 2026

Comparative Effects of Dynamic Stretching Versus Slider Neurodynamic Technique In Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy

An interventional study of Dynamic stretching and slider neurodynamic mobilization in Lumbar Radiculopathy, sponsored by University of Lahore. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by University of Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will be a randomised clinical trial conducted at the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 72 participants will be selected and randomly allocated into two treatment groups (36 participants in each group) using the lottery method. All screened and willing participants who meet the eligibility criteria will be assigned to either Group A or Group B.

Group A will receive dynamic stretching along with routine physiotherapy. Routine physiotherapy will include TENS (15 minutes), hot moist pack (10 minutes), soft tissue mobilisation (5-7 minutes), abdominal bracing, pelvic tilt, and alternate leg extension exercises. The dynamic stretching part will include the slump stretch, cat-camel stretch, hamstring sweeps, child pose stretch, and overhead lateral stretch. Each stretch will be performed in 2 sets of 15-20 repetitions with 1-minute rest between sets. Treatment will be provided four times per week for 6 weeks.

Group B will receive slider neurodynamic mobilisation along with the same routine physiotherapy protocol as group A. Slider neurodynamic mobilisation will be performed in the slump position, sitting at the edge of the plinth with the thighs parallel to each other and arms crossing behind the back. The examiner asked the patient to move actively and conversely from a position of neck and trunk flexion, knee flexion, and plantar flexion, to a position of neck and trunk extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion with 3 sets of 1-minute sliders and 1-minute rest between sets. Treatment will be provided four times per week for 6 weeks.

All participants will undergo assessments at baseline, at the end of the 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week.

Read the detailed description
  • Screening Participants who meet the inclusion criteria was recruited using a convenience sampling technique. This involves selecting participants who are readily available to participate in the study.
  • Allocation Eligible participants were screened and informed about the study, including its purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. Informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to their formal enrollment in the study.
  • Randomization:

Following the baseline assessment, the randomization was conducted using the Online Randomizer tool (https://www.randomizer.org/). By specifying the group numbers, the number of participants per group, and the total number of participants, unique identification numbers were generated for each participant.

  • Blindness: This study was single-blinded; the patients were kept blinded about the study and were not informed about the exercise protocol they received.
  • Intervention After taking consent, participants was selected based on the inclusion criteria. Sample of 72 was then be randomly divided into two groups.

All participants received a 35-minute treatment session, 4 days per week for 6 weeks, consisting of 15 minutes of routine physiotherapy and 20 minutes of a specific intervention:

Group A (Dynamic Stretching): Routine physiotherapy included TENS (70 Hz, 100 microseconds) for 15 minutes, hot moist packs for 10 minutes, and core strengthening (pelvic tilts and leg extensions). The main intervention was 20 minutes of dynamic stretching, including the slump stretch(The patient performed a slump stretch, seated with knees bent, extending one leg at a time while flexing the trunk forward to stretch the lumbar nerve roots), cat and camel(The patient alternated between spinal flexion and extension while on hands and knees.), hamstring sweeps(The patient performed dynamic hamstring stretches, sweeping the leg forward and back to increase flexibility in the posterior chain.), child's pose, and overhead lateral stretches(The patient performed a side stretch to target the quadratus lumborum and obliques, releasing tension from the side of the back.). Each exercise was performed for 4 minutes in 2 sets of 10-15 repetitions with 1 minute rest interval.

Group B (Slider Neurodynamic Technique): Routine physiotherapy matched Group A but included 5 minutes of soft tissue mobilization. The main intervention was the Slider Neurodynamic Mobilization (NDM). Patients were seated and performed rhythmic movements: moving from neck/trunk flexion and knee flexion to neck/trunk extension and knee extension. This movement is designed to "slide" the nerve through the spinal canal without over-tensioning it. This was performed in 3 sets of 1-minute intervals.

Clinical assessments for pain (NPRS), disability (MODI), and flexibility (MMST) were recorded at baseline, the 3rd week, and the 6th week to compare the efficacy of the two protocols.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Keywords

  • lumbar radiculopathy
  • sciatica
03

In context

Radiculopathy

483 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiculopathy; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Radiculopathy.

Browse Radiculopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Lahore is the lead sponsor of 232 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- • Participants aged between 25 - 50 years of both genders are included

  • Symptoms that radiate below the buttocks, thigh/ knee, and lower leg for more than 4 weeks.
  • A minimum baseline Pain intensity (NPRS) >4/10. (Morsi et al., 2022)
  • Diagnosis of discogenic low back pain (LBP) confirmed by MRI ( disc bulge, protrusion, and herniation) and referred by an orthopedic physician.
  • LBP due to muscle tightness/ or nerve compression.
  • Had a positive slump test with reproduction of neurological symptoms, and had functional disabilities in certain daily tasks as lifting or walking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    • Currently pregnant women or in the early post-partum period.
    • Patients with disease (ankylosing spondylitis, RA)
    • Previous history of trauma ( fracture, soft tissue injuries) or spinal surgery (spinal laminectomy).
    • Systemic diseases like cardiovascular disease( unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias) and metabolic diseases.
    • to exercises or usage of TENS (cardiac pacemaker, skin allergies to electrodes).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dynamic Stretching + Routine Physiotherapy

    Participants in this group will receive Dynamic stretching Includes slump stretch, cat and camel, hamstring sweeps, child pose, and overhead lateral stretch. Protocol: 2 sets of 10-15 repetitions for 4 minutes with 1-minute rest intervals

    Other: Dynamic stretching · Other: Routine physiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Slider Neurodynamic Mobilization + Routine Physiotherapy

    Participants in this arm will receive Slider Neurodynamic Mobilization (NDM) along with routine physiotherapy. NDM slider techniques will be performed in the slump position according to a standardised protocol ( the patient to move actively and conversely from a position of neck and trunk flexion, knee flexion, and plantar flexion, to a position of neck and trunk extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion ) protocol: 3 sets of 1 minute slider movement with 1 minute rest interval

    Other: slider neurodynamic mobilization · Other: Routine physiotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherDynamic stretching

    Dynamic stretching protocol will include: * Slump Stretch (4 minutes): The patient performed a slump stretch, seated with knees bent, extending one leg at a time while flexing the trunk forward to stretch the lumbar nerve roots. * Cat and Camel Stretch (4 minutes): The patient alternated between spinal flexion and extension while on hands and knees. * Hamstring Sweeps (4 minutes): The patient performed dynamic hamstring stretches, sweeping the leg forward and back to increase flexibility in the posterior chain. * Child's Pose Stretch (4 minutes): The patient performed a child's pose stretch to improve flexibility in the lower back and hips. * Overhead Lateral Stretch (4 minutes): The patient performed a side stretch to target the quadratus lumborum and obliques, releasing tension from the side of the back. Each dynamic stretch will be performed as follows: * 2 sets of 10-15 repetitions * 1-minute rest between sets * Performed 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks

  • Otherslider neurodynamic mobilization

    Performed in the slump sitting position. Participants move from neck and trunk flexion with knee flexion and plantar flexion toward neck and trunk extension with knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion. The protocol consists of 3 sets of 1-minute slider movements, each followed by 1 minute of rest.

  • OtherRoutine physiotherapy

    TENS: Conventional Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation was applied for 15 minutes (70 Hz frequency, 100 μs pulse width). Two 40×40 mm electrodes were positioned in a crossed pattern bilaterally over the lumbosacral region. A hot moist pack was applied to the lumbosacral and gluteal regions for 10 minutes in prone lying.Strengthening and Stabilization Exercises: Pelvic tilts were performed in crook-lying with 10-15 second holds. Alternate leg extensions were performed in prone with 10-second holds. Quadriceps and hip adductor/abductor strengthening were completed using isometric contractions (e.g., pillow squeeze)..All exercises were performed in 2 sets of 15-20 repetitions with 1 min rest. and lumbar traction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity (NPRS)

    Pain Intensity will n=be measured using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) , where participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0= no pain, 10= worst possible pain). the scale will be used to assess changes in pain levels over the duration of the intervention.

    Time frame: baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index -MODI)

    Functional disability will be measured using the modified oswestry low back pain disability index, a validated questionnaire assessing limitations in everyday activities. scores range from 0-100 % with higher scores indicating greater disability. the measure will be used to determine changes in functional ability.

    Time frame: baseline,3rd week, 6th week

  2. Lumbar Flexion Range of Motion (Modified-Modified Schober Test - MMST)

    Lumbar flexion range of motion will be assessed using the Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST). The test measures the change in distance between two points on the lumbar spine during forward flexion. Increased distance indicates improved lumbar mobility.

    Time frame: baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Lahore Teaching Hospital
    Lahore, Punjab Province 55150, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shaheen HM, Belgen Kaygisiz B. Comparison of different treatment positions of nerve slider technique for patients with low back pain: a randomized control trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;61(1):82-92. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08541-1. Epub 2025 Jan 28. PubMed 39873676 ↗
  • Nahid ZBS, Ahmed F, Islam MF, Rahman Z, Haque MF, Arju A, Islam MR, Moula G, Sarker B. Effectiveness of Shacklock's Neural Mobilization for Acute and Sub-Acute Lumbar Disc Prolapsed: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70872. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70872. eCollection 2025 May. PubMed 40432703 ↗
  • de Ridder R, De Blaiser C, Verrelst R, De Saer R, Desmet A, Schuermans J. Neurodynamic sliders promote flexibility in tight hamstring syndrome. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Aug;20(7):973-980. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1675770. Epub 2019 Oct 22. PubMed 31578925 ↗
  • Danazumi MS, Bello B, Yakasai AM, Kaka B. Two manual therapy techniques for management of lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. J Osteopath Med. 2021 Feb 26;121(4):391-400. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0261. PubMed 33705612 ↗
  • Ghaderi Niri H, Ghanavati T, Mostafaee N, Salahzadeh Z, Divandari A, Adigozali H, Ahadi J. Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Changes in Iranian People with Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Physiotherapy. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(1):58-65. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.72246.3366. PubMed 38318303 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07384832
Collaborators
University of Lahore Hospital (ULH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2026
Completion
Feb 10, 2026
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

Asim Arif, PhD
principal investigator · University of Lahore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion