CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07382518STFUpdated Feb 2, 2026

Effects of Motivational and Instructional Self-Talk on Performance and Stress in Soccer Forwards

An interventional study of Motivational Self-Talk Training and Instructional Self-Talk Training in Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer Performance, sponsored by Beijing Sport University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-02.

Sponsored by Beijing Sport University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study investigates the effects of different types of self-talk on performance and stress regulation in soccer forwards. Self-talk is a psychological technique in which athletes use specific verbal cues to guide their thoughts and actions during training and competition. Two commonly used forms are motivational self-talk, which focuses on confidence and effort, and instructional self-talk, which focuses on technical and tactical cues.

Thirty-six male soccer forwards of different competitive levels participated in this study. Players were randomly assigned to a motivational self-talk group, an instructional self-talk group, or a control group. The intervention lasted six weeks. Before and after the intervention, participants completed assessments of soccer-specific technical skills, physical performance, and match tactical behavior. Psychological measures of self-efficacy and biological indicators of stress (salivary cortisol) were also collected.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether different self-talk strategies produce different effects depending on players' competitive level and task demands. The findings are expected to provide practical guidance for the use of psychological training strategies in soccer and other team sports.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer Performance

Keywords

  • Self-talk
  • Soccer
  • Psychological intervention
  • Athletic performance
  • Stress regulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beijing Sport University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male university football players aged 18-25 years
  • Full-time university students regularly engaged in organized football training and competition
  • At least two years of systematic football training experience
  • In good general health at the time of enrollment
  • No musculoskeletal injuries or medical conditions affecting football performance within the previous 6 months
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing
  • Able to understand study procedures and complete soccer-specific performance and decision-making tasks
  • Provided written informed consent prior to participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of neurological, psychiatric, or cognitive disorders that could influence decision-making or reaction time
  • Current participation in structured psychological skills training programs (e.g., self-talk training, imagery, mindfulness training) outside routine football practice during the study period
  • Use of medications or substances known to affect cognitive function
  • Presence of any medical condition or injury contraindicating participation in football training or testing
  • Failure to comply with the intervention protocol or outcome assessments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motivational Self-Talk

    Participants in this group received a motivational self-talk intervention designed to enhance confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and competition.

    Behavioral: Motivational Self-Talk Training

  • Experimental
    Instructional Self-Talk

    Participants in this group received an instructional self-talk intervention focusing on technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer activities.

    Behavioral: Instructional Self-Talk Training

  • Experimental
    Control

    Participants in the control group continued their regular soccer training without receiving any structured self-talk intervention.

    Behavioral: No Self-Talk (Usual Training Control)

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational Self-Talk Training

    Participants received structured motivational self-talk training aimed at enhancing confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and match-related tasks. Individualized motivational cue words and phrases were developed and practiced under guidance, and participants were instructed to apply these cues consistently throughout the six-week intervention period.

  • BehavioralInstructional Self-Talk Training

    Participants were instructed to apply task-specific instructional self-talk cues to guide technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer training over a six-week intervention period.

  • BehavioralNo Self-Talk (Usual Training Control)

    Participants in the control group continued their regular soccer training and match preparation without receiving any form of structured self-talk instruction. No motivational or instructional self-talk strategies were introduced during the intervention period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Match-Based Technical and Tactical Performance

    Match-based technical and tactical performance was assessed during regular soccer match play using standardized match analysis procedures. This outcome represents players' overall technical and tactical performance exhibited in a real match context over the intervention period.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shooting Accuracy

    Shooting accuracy was evaluated using a standardized soccer shooting test. Participants performed a series of shots toward predefined target zones within the goal. Shooting accuracy was calculated as the percentage of successful shots directed into the target areas, with higher percentages indicating better shooting performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  2. Sport Self-Efficacy

    Sport self-efficacy was assessed using the Sport Self-Efficacy Scale, a validated self-report questionnaire designed to measure individuals' perceived confidence in performing sport-related skills and tasks. The scale consists of multiple items rated on a Likert-type scale, yielding a total score ranging from 10 to 50, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived self-efficacy in sport performance contexts.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  3. Dribbling Run Performance

    Dribbling run performance was assessed using a standardized soccer dribbling run test. Participants completed the task while controlling the ball along a predefined running course, and performance was quantified as total completion time (seconds) recorded under standardized testing conditions.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  4. Loughborough Soccer Passing Test Performance

    Passing performance was assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), a standardized and widely used soccer-specific passing assessment. Participants were required to complete a series of prescribed passing and ball-control actions according to the standardized test protocol. Performance was quantified as the total time (seconds) required to complete the test under controlled testing conditions.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  5. Salivary Cortisol Concentration

    Salivary cortisol concentration was assessed as an index of physiological stress response. Saliva samples were collected using standardized saliva collection procedures and cortisol levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods under controlled laboratory conditions.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Sport University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to participant confidentiality and institutional data protection policies.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07382518
Lead sponsor
Beijing Sport University
Responsible party
Yue Dou (Graduate Student, Beijing Sport University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Jan 20, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 7, 2025
Completion
Apr 5, 2025
Last update
Feb 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion