CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07381010Updated Feb 2, 2026

Learn About Caring for a Person Living With Dementia

A Phase 1 interventional study of Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) and Standard Health Education in Dementia, sponsored by Texas Christian University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-02.

Sponsored by Texas Christian University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
73
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of is project is to improve caregiver education about the behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD) of dementia. This intervention will incorporate principles from the science of learning for structuring retrieval practice to optimize learning and long-term retention of key health information. The processing-knowledge model for ADRD care predicts that enhancing health knowledge using structured retrieval practice will best support caregivers of people living with dementia (PLwD).

Read the detailed description

This study consisted of a screener and two sessions. Participants began by answering screener questions to see if they qualified to participate in the study. In Session 1, participants completed measures of self-efficacy and dementia symptom severity at their own pace. Next, participants studied 4 categories of emotions and mood symptoms of ADRD (agitation, irritation, apathy, depression) in a webpage format, as would be available from online resources (e.g., National Institutes of Health) to mirror caregivers often obtain information. Study was self-paced and order of topics was randomized. Following study, caregivers were randomly assigned to the restudy group or the structured retrieval group. Those in the restudy group restudied the four categories in the same format as before, at their own pace. Those in the structured retrieval group took a self-paced practice test consisting of 8 multiple-choice questions for each of the 4-categories in a blocked fashion such that participants answered all 8 questions in one category, in a random order (e.g., apathy), before moving onto the next (e.g., agitation), and received detailed, corrective feedback following each answer to the multiple-choice questions. Participants either studied or practice retrieval for 3 practice blocks. The order of categories and questions was randomized for each participant during each practice block. Following practice, participants completed the 10-minute problem solving task. Participants then took a self-paced multiple-choice test consisting of all 32 multiple-choice questions (i.e., the same questions as in practice). After the test, participants completed a self-paced usability measure and provided demographic information.

Session 2 began two days later, and participants began by taking the same self-paced multiple-choice test as in Session 1. Next, they completed a vocabulary task, self-efficacy scale, dementia symptom severity scale, measure of health knowledge, information seeking, and provide demographic information. Finally, participants were thanked, debriefed, and compensated for their participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dementia care
  • symptoms of dementia
  • caregiver knowledge
03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 73 is below the median of 83 across 1,629 interventional studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas Christian University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Caregiver for a person living with dementia
  • Read and speak English
  • Free from cognitive impairments that prevent consenting or completing experimental tasks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Technology issues (e.g., loss of internet connection)
  • Not finishing the study
  • Significant distractions
  • Failing 2 or more attention or bot checks
  • Response times 3+ standard deviations from the mean for time sensitive measures
  • Completing session 1 in less than 1 hour
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
73 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) intervention

    Behavioral: Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP)

  • Active comparator
    Active Control Comparison

    Rereading

    Behavioral: Standard Health Education

Interventions

  • BehavioralStructured Retrieval Practice (SRP)

    Our Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) Caregiver Intervention is a web-based multi-media program designed to enhance dementia caregivers' goal-relevant memory, reduce caregiver stress, and reduce perceptions of symptom severity. The self-guided online intervention does not require supervision by a healthcare professional. Caregivers learn modules on dementia care and complete dynamic multiple-choice tests targeting practical knowledge supported with detailed, elaborative feedback to correct health misconceptions.

  • BehavioralStandard Health Education

    Caregivers re-read modules on Alzheimer's Disease or related dementias (ADRD) in a webpage format, as would be available from online resources (e.g., National Institutes of Health) to mirror how most caregivers obtain information.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Delayed test performance

    Proportion correct on the final 2-day delayed test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test was in multiple-choice format. Performance was explored via percent correct on the test, magnitude of the retrieval practice effect on the test, and amount of forgetting.

    Time frame: 2 days after baseline

  2. Immediate test performance

    Proportion correct on the immediate (approx. 10 min retention interval) test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test was multiple-choice format. Performance was explored via percent correct on the test, magnitude of the retrieval practice effect on the test, and amount of forgetting.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregiver Self-efficacy

    Caregiver self-efficacy for symptom management will be measured using the symptom subscale of the Family Caregiver Self-efficacy for Dementia Scale (Fortinsky, Kercher, \& Burant, 2002), which includes 5 items. An example item is, "how certain are you right now that you can handle any problems your relative has, like memory loss, wandering, or behavior problems." Responses will be given using a 1 (not at all certain) to 10 (very certain) scale. We will expand this scale to include items that match with our content and our symptom presence, severity, and frequency measure. Specifically, participants will respond to 12 questions using a scale from 1 (not at all certain) to 10 (very certain). An example item is, "how certain are you right now that you can handle when your loved one living with dementia experiences false beliefs or delusions?" Caregiver self-efficacy will be measured twice applying a pre-test post-test design.

    Time frame: pre-intervention and 2-days post baseline

  2. E-Health Literacy

    The E-health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Norman \& Skinner, 2006 will be administered to assess perceived skills and comfort related to using internet resources for acquiring health knowledge. The scale includes 10 questions (e.g., I can tell high quality from low quality health resources on the internet). Questions require responding on a Likert sale ranging from 1 to 5 (1-strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3-undecided, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree; 1-not useful at all, 2-not useful, 3-unsure, 4-useful, 5-very useful; or 1-not important at all, 2-not important, 3-unsure, 4-important, 5-very important). Composite scores will be calculated with higher scores indicate higher e-health literacy.

    Time frame: 2 days after baseline

  3. Letter and pattern comparison

    Perceptual speed will be measured with the Letter Comparison Test and Pattern Comparison Test (Salthouse, 1993). The Letter Comparison Test involves 21 letter string pairs to be judged as the same or different. The Pattern Comparison Test involves 30 line patterns to be judged as the same or different. For both comparison tests, participants are given 24 seconds per test to complete as many items as possible, and performance is calculated as the number of items correct. Performance on each test will be calculated as the number of items correct, and a composite score will be calculated per participant.

    Time frame: 2 days after baseline

  4. Raven's Progressive Matrices

    Non-verbal fluid intelligence will be assessed with a computerized version of Raven's progressive matrices (Raven, et al., 1998). Participants will complete 18 trials in ascending order in trial normative difficulty (Ariel, Babineau, \& Tauber, 2023; adapted from Stanovich \& Cunningham, 1993). For each trial, a 3 x 3 array will be displayed with 8 geometric figures. The 9th position in the bottom right-hand corner will be empty. Participants will be given 8 geometric figures from which to choose to correctly complete the array. Participants will be given 10 minutes to complete as many trials as possible. Performance will be calculated as the total number of trials correct.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Vocabulary

    General knowledge will be assessed using a common measure of general knowledge in cognitive aging research, the Advanced Vocabulary Test I-v-4 (Ekstrom et al., 1976). Participants will be presented with a series of words and required to select the synonym for each word out of five options. Participants are given 4 min per task to complete as many words as possible (36 total problems, 8 min total). The self-paced vocabulary test is presented in a fixed order, and no feedback is provided. Performance is calculated as the number of items correct while adjusting for guessing (i.e., number of items correct - (.2 \* number of items incorrect)).

    Time frame: 2 days after baseline

  6. Medical Health Knowledge

    Participants will complete the Medical Term Recognition Test (METER, Rawson et al., 2010). The METER is completed on paper. A list of 40 medical words and 40 nonwords are presented. Participants read the list of items and select the ones that they recognize as real words. Participants are instructed not to guess and to only select items they are sure were real words. Performance on the METER is calculated as the number of words correctly recognized.

    Time frame: 2 days after Baseline

  7. Dementia Health Knowledge

    The Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS, Carpenter et al., 2009) will be administered, and scale composite score will be calculated. The ADKS is a 30-item true/false that has been adapted cross-culturally and used to estimate knowledge of people with varying expertise in Alzheimer's Disease. It includes 4 symptom statements (e.g., Tremor or shaking of the hands or arms is a common symptom in people with AD - False), 5 caregiving statements (e.g., People with AD do best with simple instructions giving one step at a time - True), and 4 treatment and management statements (e.g., Poor nutrition can make the symptoms of AD worse - True). Participants respond by indicating true, false, or don't know.

    Time frame: 2 days after Baseline

  8. Performance During Learning

    Caregivers' performance during learning will be defined as the percent correct on retrieval practice trials. Specifically, caregivers will respond to multiple choice questions during learning when engaging in retrieval practice, and learning progress will be quantified by aggregating responses across items for each block. Each multiple choice question will have 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures, and responses will be scored as 1 (correct) or 0 (incorrect) and then aggregated per participant. This is a quantitative measure that is standard in the science of learning and for which no validated scale is available. Performance on retrieval practice trials for the will be evaluated with item-level analysis (to explore content difficulty) and across each learning block to establish participants' rate-of-learning.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Usability Measures

    The Perceived Usefulness (PU), Ease of Use (PEUO), Enjoyment (PNJ), Behavioral Intentions (BI), Relevance, and Output Quality (OUT) subscales of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 3 scale (Venkatesh \& Bala, 2008) will be administered, and scale composite score will be calculated. The subscales include 3 to 4 items. An example item from the Ease of Use scale is, "I find this system easy to use." An example item from the Enjoyment scale is, "The actual process of using the system is pleasant." Questions will be adapted for our sample. For instance, questions like, "Using the system improves my performance in my job", will be altered to read, "Using the program improves my ability to manage symptoms for an individual living with dementia." Responses to all questions will be made on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Symptom Presence, Severity, and Frequency

    The behavioral and psychological symptoms experienced by the person living with dementia will be rated by the caregiver participants using the updated version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q; Cummings et al., 1994; Resnick et al., 2024; Resnick et al., 2021). This measure includes 12 items that the participant will rate on presence (yes vs. no), severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), and distress (1 = not distressing at all to 5 = extremely distressing). Perceived symptom severity will be measured twice applying a pre-test post-test design.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention at Baseline and 2 days after Baseline

  11. Demographic Characteristics

    Age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, first generation status, member of an underrepresented group, native language, socioeconomic status, occupation, zip code, relationship with individual living with Alzheimer's Disease or a related dementia (e.g., child, spouse), caregiving status and duration of caregiving, and information seeking about dementia and caregiving.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 days after Baseline

  12. Self-reported Subjective health information

    Caregivers will self-report co-morbid medical conditions for the PLwD, and will report medication use, rating of health, hospitalizations, access to health insurance for the PLwD. Caregivers will be allowed to skip any questions they desire should they prefer not to report responses to any of these questions. No measurement scale will be used for these self-report questions. Instead, these brief questions are intended to obtain general health information. Example questions include, "does the person have other chronic conditions?" "Does the person living with dementia take any prescription medications?" and "Have you gone to the hospital emergency room (ER) about the person living with dementia's health in the past year (12 months)?" Responses to these questions will be used for descriptive purposes to better understand the sample and will not be aggregated into one measure.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 days after Baseline

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Texas Christian University
    Fort Worth, Texas 76129, United States
  • Virginia Wesleyan University
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07381010
Lead sponsor
Texas Christian University
Responsible party
Uma Tauber (Professor, Texas Christian University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion