CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07380360Updated Feb 11, 2026

An Immediate Implant Will be Placed Using the MiniNaviDent System and Static Guide. A Postoperative CBCT Scan Will Then be Acquired and Superimposed Onto the Preoperative CBCT Scan to Assess and Compare Implant Deviation Relative to the Preoperative Plan

An interventional study of Dynamic navigation system-assisted dental implant placement and CAD/CAM static surgical guide-assisted dental implant placement in Remaining Root and Tooth Extraction, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-11.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study aims to evaluate implant deviation during immediate implant placement using dynamic navigation. By utilizing implant planning software, two CBCT scans (preoperative and postoperative) will be superimposed to assess the accuracy of dynamic navigation in immediate implant placement, which is considered a more complex procedure compared to delayed implant placement

Read the detailed description

First, a fiducial marker will be placed in the patient's mouth, followed by a CBCT scan with the marker in position. The implant will then be virtually planned using implant planning software. Using the MiniNaviDent system and the fiducial marker, the implant will be placed. After placement, a postoperative CBCT scan will be obtained. The postoperative scan will be superimposed onto the preoperative scan to measure implant deviation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Remaining Root
  • Tooth Extraction

Keywords

  • immediate implant
  • dynamic navigation
  • static guide
  • CBCT superimposition
  • guided implant surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy patients at least 21 years old.
  2. Systemically healthy patients with no effect on the surgery.
  3. At least one hopeless maxillary or mandibular tooth to be restored using an implant.
  4. At least six residual teeth in the affected jaw.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A medical condition or medication that would impair bone healing.
  2. Poor oral hygiene
  3. Alcohol users.
  4. Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
  5. History of head and neck radiotherapy.
  6. Pregnant females.
  7. Uncontrolled hypertensive or diabetic patients.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dynamic navigation-guided implant placement

    Dental implant osteotomy preparation and implant insertion performed using a dynamic navigation system to guide implant placement in real time according to the digital plan (CBCT-based planning with intraoperative navigation guidance)

    Device: Dynamic navigation system-assisted dental implant placement

  • Active comparator
    Static guided implant placement

    Implant placement performed using a patient-specific CAD/CAM static surgical guide fabricated from the digital plan.

    Device: CAD/CAM static surgical guide-assisted dental implant placement

Interventions

  • DeviceDynamic navigation system-assisted dental implant placement

    Dental implant placement performed using a dynamic computer-assisted navigation system with real-time guidance. The implant position is planned pre-operatively using CBCT (and intraoral scan data if applicable). During surgery, the system tracks the patient reference and the drill/handpiece and displays real-time guidance to follow the planned implant trajectory for osteotomy preparation and implant insertion. Device name: mini Navident

  • DeviceCAD/CAM static surgical guide-assisted dental implant placement

    Dental implant placement performed using a patient-specific CAD/CAM static surgical guide. The guide is designed from the digital implant plan (CBCT and, if applicable, intraoral scan) and fabricated (e.g., 3D printed). The static guide (with sleeves) is used to guide osteotomy preparation and implant insertion according to the planned implant position.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coronal deviation (mm) Apical deviation (mm)

    Implant deviation was defined as the discrepancy between the planned implant position (as established in the preoperative planning software) and the actual implant position placed using dynamic navigation and a static surgical guide. To quantify this deviation, the postoperative CBCT was superimposed (registered) onto the preoperative planned CBCT, and the resulting spatial differences between the planned and placed implants were measured and reported in millimeters (mm)

    Time frame: Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery

  2. Angular deviation (degrees)

    Implant deviation was defined as the discrepancy between the planned implant position (as established in the preoperative planning software) and the actual implant position placed using dynamic navigation and a static surgical guide. To quantify this deviation, the postoperative CBCT was superimposed (registered) onto the preoperative planned CBCT, and the resulting spatial differences between the planned and placed implants were measured and reported in and the angular deviation in degrees was measured.

    Time frame: Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total surgical time (minutes)

    Total operative time recorded in minutes from first mucosal incision to completion of final implant insertion (last implant fully seated). Time will be recorded by an independent observer using a stopwatch and compared between the dynamic navigation and Static Guide groups

    Time frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ain shams university
    Cairo, Cairo Governorate 11566, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07380360
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Nov 24, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 25, 2025
Completion
Sep 25, 2025
Last update
Feb 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion