An interventional study of guided bone regeneration technique and No intervention in Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate Loading, sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.
Sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study aims to compare the clinical success and patient-reported outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal augmentation versus immediately loaded implants placed without regeneration techniques.
This is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, comparative clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants using two different surgical approaches. One group will receive implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation, while the comparison group will receive immediately loaded implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration techniques.
The primary outcome of the study is implant success at 12 months after implant placement. Secondary outcomes include marginal bone level changes, complication rates, and oral health-related quality of life assessed using a validated questionnaire. The study is conducted with a parallel assignment model and an open-label design due to the nature of the surgical interventions.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid is the lead sponsor of 200 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult patients requiring dental implant placement Presence of buccal dehiscence at the implant site Indication for immediate loading Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Uncontrolled systemic diseases Active periodontal disease Heavy smoking exceeding predefined limits Conditions contraindicating oral surgery
Horizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading
Procedure: guided bone regeneration technique
Immediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques.
Procedure: No intervention
Immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites presenting buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation using a guided bone regeneration technique according to a standardized surgical protocol.
Immediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques.
Implant Success Rate
Implant success is defined as implant survival at 12 months, absence of clinical mobility, absence of persistent pain or infection, absence of peri-implant radiolucency, and no need for implant removal or surgical re-intervention.
Time frame: 12 months after implant placement
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid