CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07373405Updated Jan 28, 2026

Online Interventions to Prevent Alcohol Use Disorders

An interventional study of Internet-Based Brief Alcohol Intervention and Unguided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,519
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Internet-based interventions can improve access to non-treatment-seeking populations, preventing the onset or progression of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Stepped-care guidelines for face-to-face AUD interventions recommend internet-based Brief Intervention (iBI) or unguided Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) for no or mild AUD, and guided iCBT for moderate to severe AUD. However, no large-scale superiority trial has compared the effectiveness of these interventions among non-treatment-seeking individuals across the full spectrum of problematic alcohol use.

Aims: 1) Compare the effectiveness of iBI, unguided, and guided iCBT in reducing alcohol consumption in non-treatment-seeking individuals with sub-threshold or full AUD; 2) develop models via machine learning for personalized AUD prevention and progression management.

Methods: A nationwide sample of 3519 individuals will be stratified by sub-threshold/mild AUD and moderate/severe AUD and randomized to: 1) online assessment (OA)+ iBI; 2) OA+ unguided iCBT; or 3) OA+ guided iCBT. The iCBT sessions will address problematic alcohol use and co-occuring externalizing and internalizing psychiatric symptoms. Data will be collected from OA, interventions, and Danish registries at baseline and 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups, with registry follow-up over 10 years.

Perspectives: Findings will compare stepped-care and machine learning-driven personalized approaches to inform guidelines for non-treatment-seeking populations. Internet-based assessment and interventions support continuous data collection, enabling ongoing improvements and personalized prevention. This large-scale dissemination targeting non-treatment-seeking populations across the full spectrum of problematic alcohol use will pave the way for future initiatives and may refine prevention strategies if the stepped-care model proves insufficient for this group.

Key words: Alcohol Use Disorder, Internet-Based Interventions, Machine Learning, Non-treatment Seekers, Stepped-Care

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Alcohol Use Disorder
  • Internet-Based Interventions
  • Machine Learning
  • Non-treatment Seekers
  • Stepped-Care
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,606 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 329 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,519 is above the median of 87 across 1,371 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Signing written informed consent
  • Being aged ≥ 18 years
  • Being a Danish resident and fluent in Danish
  • Having at least weekly access to a computer or mobile phone with internet
  • Having at least hazardous alcohol use, corresponding to an AUDIT cut-off score of ≥ 8/6 for men/women (no upper limit on the AUDIT score, as the alternative is no preventive intervention)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving other psychological treatment
  • Being suicidal or having severe comorbid psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3,519 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Internet-Based Brief Alcohol Intervention

    Behavioral: Internet-Based Brief Alcohol Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Unguided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Behavioral: Unguided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Behavioral: Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralInternet-Based Brief Alcohol Intervention

    Brief Alcohol Intervention usually involves two components: assessing for hazardous alcohol use or AUD to identify problems early, and providing counselling. We are testing the effects of a digitalized version.

  • BehavioralUnguided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Unguided Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) is a cost-effective intervention, where users complete structured, evidence-based CBT modules online without therapist involvement. The programs focus on teaching users techniques like identifying and challenging negative thoughts to manage - in this context - Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms.

  • BehavioralGuided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) utilizes the structured, online delivery of CBT modules but adds regular, personalized support from a human therapist or trained coach. This human component typically involves checking assignments, providing motivational feedback, and tailoring advice to significantly boost user adherence and clinical outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index

    Alcohol consumption will be assessed using the Quantity-Frequency-Variability index, a quantity-frequency measure capturing drinking patterns over the past 7 and 30 days. The Quantity-Frequency-Variability index provides estimates of the number of drinking days, the number of drinks per drinking day, and the number of heavy drinking days (≥ 5 standard units of alcohol \[SUA\]). These measures are listed separately as distinct primary outcome measures.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 24 months.

  2. Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index: Alcohol Frequency

    Measured using the Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index. Participants report the number of days they consumed alcohol in the past 7 and 30 days. Higher values indicate more frequent drinking.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 24 months.

  3. Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index: Alcohol Quantity

    Measured using the Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index. Participants report the average number of standard units of alcohol (SUA) consumed on a typical drinking day in the past 30 days. Higher values indicate higher consumption per occasion.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 24 months.

  4. Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index: Alcohol Variability

    Measured using the Quantity-Frequency-Variability Index. Participants report the number of days they consumed ≥ 5 standard units of alcohol (SUA) in the past 7 and 30 days. This captures the variability and pattern of drinking.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 24 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Adapted to Internet-Based Interventions

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Adapted to Internet-Based Interventions includes 8 items measuring global satisfaction with web-based interventions. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (does not apply to me) to 4 (does totally apply to me). The minimum score is 8 and the maximum score is 32. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessed at the 3-month follow-up assessment.

  2. System Usability Scale

    The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to measure subjective usability of internet-based interventions. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate better usability.

    Time frame: Assessed at the 3-month follow-up assessment.

  3. Readiness-to-Change Questionnaire - Treatment Version

    The Readiness-to-Change Questionnaire - Treatment Version is a 12-item measure designed to assess the respondent's stated intentions regarding changing their drinking behaviour. It includes three subscales representing different stages of change: (1) Pre-contemplation, (2) Contemplation, and (3) Action. Each subscale consists of four items, and responses are rated on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from -2 (strongly disagree) to +2 (strongly agree). Total scores can range from -24 to +24. Higher scores on a specific subscale indicate greater alignment with that stage of change.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  4. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

    The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test consists of 10 items assessing alcohol consumption, drinking behaviours, and alcohol-related problems. Items 1 to 8 are scored 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, while items 9 and 10 are scored 0, 2 or 4. The total score can range from 0 to 40, with 0 indicating an abstainer who has never experienced any alcohol-related problems. In the study, only individuals who score ≥8 for men and ≥6 for women will be included, as scores from 1 to 7 for men and 1 to 5 for women suggest low-risk alcohol consumption according to WHO guidelines. Scores of 8 to 15 for men and 6 to 13 for women indicate hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption, while scores above 15 for men and above 13 for women suggest the likelihood of alcohol dependence (moderate-severe alcohol use disorder).

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  5. Drug Use Disorders Identification Test

    The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test consists of 11 items assessing drug use patterns and drug-related problems (excluding alcohol). Items 1 to 9 are scored 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, while items 10 and 11 and are scored 0, 2 or 4. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 44, with higher scores reflecting higher drug dependence. A score of 6 for men and 2 for women indicates drug-related problems or harmful drug consumption, while a score of greater than 24 for both sexes suggests probable dependence on one or more drugs.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  6. EuroQol five-dimensions-five-levels: Index Value

    The EuroQol five-dimensions-five-levels assesses quality of life across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with five levels of severity for each (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or extreme problems). The health state profile is converted into a single index value using the Danish value set (Jensen et al., 2023). In this context, the maximum score is 1.0, while the minimum score is -0.757. Higher scores indicates higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  7. EuroQol five-dimensions-five-levels: Visual Analogue Scale

    Participants rate their overall health on a vertical visual analogue scale. The scales ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater overall health perception.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  8. Brief Symptom Inventory 18

    The Brief Symptom Inventory 18 is an 18-item questionnaire designed to assess psychological distress. Each item describes a symptom, and respondents rate the extent to which they have been bothered by the symptom over the past week on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores for all items are summarized on the Global Severity Index. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 72. Higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological distress.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  9. Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire - Short-Form

    The 12-item Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire - Short-Form consists of four subscales measuring hostility, anger, and physical and verbal aggression. Each subscale consists of three items, and responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlike me) to 5 (extremely like me). The minimum score is 12 and the maximum score is 60. Higher scores indicate higher levels of aggression.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up.

  10. Negative Effects Questionnaire

    The Negative Effects Questionnaire includes 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), distinguishing between negative effects attributed to the intervention and those potentially caused by other factors. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 80. Higher scores indicate a higher burden of negative effects.

    Time frame: Assessed at the 3-month follow-up assessment.

  11. Register Data: Danish Education and Income Statistics Registers

    Information on highest achieved education, employment, and economy will be retrieved.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  12. Register Data: Danish National Patient Register

    Data on inpatient and outpatient Alcohol Use Disorder-related contacts, prior Alcohol Use Disorder treatment, and other comorbidities will be collected.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  13. Register Data: National Alcohol Treatment Register

    Data on Alcohol Use Disorder treatment duration and intensity, treatment retention and type of treatment conclusion (i.e., dropout or completion), and prior Alcohol Use Disorder treatment will be retrieved.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  14. Register Data: National Register of Substance Abusers in treatment

    Data on Alcohol Use Disorder treatment duration and intensity, treatment retention and type of treatment conclusion (i.e., dropout or completion), and prior Alcohol Use Disorder treatment will be retrieved.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  15. Register Data: Danish Prescription Register

    Data on prescription of pharmacological treatment targeting Alcohol Use Disorder (e.g. disulfiram, naltrexone) and number of released receipts will be retrieved.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  16. Register Data: Psychiatric Central Research Register

    Data on inpatient and outpatient Alcohol Use Disorder-related contacts, prior Alcohol Use Disorder treatment, and other comorbidities will be collected.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

  17. Register Data: Cause of Death Register

    Data on the date and primary cause of death, including both internal and external causes (accident, suicide, or murder), will be retrieved.

    Time frame: Will be collected for 10 years from enrollment.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07373405
Lead sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2038 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Angelina Isabella Mellentin, Ph.D.
Contact
amellentin@health.sdu.dk
+45 65 41 13 31
Nicolai Nør-Hansen, Pregraduate Psychology student
Contact
nnoer21@student.sdu.dk
+45 21 48 58 75

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion