ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07366008NorCUPUpdated Jan 26, 2026

The NorCUP Trial: Improving Prognosis and Personalized Treatment in Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP)

An interventional study of Comprehensive molecular profiling in Cancer of Unknown Primary Site, sponsored by Haukeland University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 6 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-26.

Sponsored by Haukeland University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to improve diagnosis and treatment strategies for patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) by using advanced molecular profiling to identify the likely tumor origin and guide therapy.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Can comprehensive molecular profiling help determine the origin of CUP tumors? Does identifying the tumor origin improve treatment choices and survival outcomes compared to historical data?

Participants will:

  • Undergo a new biopsy to collect tumor tissue for advanced analyses.
  • Provide blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA/ctDNA) analyses.
  • Provide a fecal sample for microbiome analysis.
  • Have their tumor tissue analyzed using:

Methylation profiling and comprehensive gene panel testing.

  • Have the results reviewed in a specialized CUP molecular MDT meeting to determine the likely tumor origin and guide treatment.
  • Have their tumor tissue samples biobanked for further exploratory whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer of Unknown Primary Site

Keywords

  • cancer of unknown primary site
  • neoplasms, unknown primary
03

In context

Neoplasms, Unknown Primary

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms, Unknown Primary; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is above the median of 52 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms, Unknown Primary.

Browse Neoplasms, Unknown Primary studies →

Lead sponsor

Haukeland University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • PS 0-2.
  • minimum 3 months.
  • Radiologically verified disease (CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis) with no radiological signs of primary tumor.
  • verified metastatic disease of unknown primary. Morphological and immunohistochemical findings suggesting a possible, but not definitive, origo is eligible.
  • Eligible histologies include adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, poorly and undifferentiated carcinoma and undifferentiated neoplasms.
  • endoscopic examinations have been performed as indicated by clinical, radiological and pathological findings, without identification of a primary tumor.
  • Clinically relevant supplementary radiological examinations have been performed as indicated by clinical, radiological and pathological findings, with no radiological signs of primary tumor (e.g. PET/CT, mammography/MR mammae).
  • Metastatic lesion available for . Protocol deviation may be allowed if lesion is not technically available for biopsy. For patients with metastatic lesion technically available for biopsy, the patient must be deemed medically fit to undergo a metastatic biopsy, as assessed by the investigator.
  • Capable of giving signed as described in Appendix 1, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the ICF and in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the treating physician, makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which could jeopardize compliance with study requirements.
  • Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition(s) potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial
  • Patient not able to give an or comply with study regulations as deemed by study investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Comprehensive molecular profiling

    Tumor methylation analyses, cfDNA methylation analyses, Whole Genome Sequencing, RNA sequencing, Broad targeted NGS panel analyses

    Genetic: Comprehensive molecular profiling

Interventions

  • GeneticComprehensive molecular profiling

    A fresh frozen biopsy and blood plasma for cfDNA analyses is taken upon inclusion for comprehensive molecular profiling. Results are discussed at a study specific CUP molecular MDT meeting.

    Also known as: whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, Tumor methylation analyses, cfDNA methylation analyses, Broad targeted NGS panel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients where the site of origin is identified

    Site of origin identified is defined as the cases where the CUP molecular MDT concludes with a likely primary site of origin

    Time frame: From enrollment to the conclusion at the CUP molecular MDT at 8 weeks

  2. Percentage of patients where treatment choice differs from empirical CUP regimen

    Organ specific treatment chosen over empirical CUP treatment, based on the conclusion from the CUP MDT

    Time frame: From conclusion at the CUP molecular MDT to the start of subsequent treatment within a timeframe of 36 months from study inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression free survival

    The length of time from the start of treatment until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: From the date of first administration of a treatment line to the date of progression or death, or censored if alive at time of analysis, with a timeframe of 36 months from study inclusion.

  2. Overall survival

    Length of time from CUP diagnosis until death from any cause

    Time frame: From date of CUP diagnosis until death from any cause or censored if alive at date of analysis, within a timeframe of 36 months from study inclusion.

  3. Identification of tumor site using molecular profiling methods

    The percentage of patients in whom the likely site of origin is identified by each molecular profiling method.

    Time frame: From study enrollment to the conclusion at the CUP molecular MDT at 8 weeks

  4. Incidence of molecular alterations and use of targeted treatment in CUP patients

    The frequency of molecular alterations and actionable targets in patients with CUP, and the percentage of patients receiving targeted therapy based on molecular profiling results. The impact of targeted treatment on survival will also be evaluated.

    Time frame: From molecular profiling to initiation of targeted therapy and follow-up for survival outcomes, within a timeframe of 36 months from study inclusion.

  5. Impact of CUP molecular MDT assessement on previous clinical work-up

    This outcome evaluates the utility of CUP molecular MDT meetings by measuring the percentage of patients for whom additional clinical work-up or pathology analyses are recommended and the concordance between local and study pathologist conclusions.

    Time frame: From enrollment until CUP mol MDT at 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Fecal Microbiome Diversity and Composition in CUP Patient

    Characterization of the fecal microbiome in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP)

    Time frame: From baseline stool sample collection through completion of analyses within a timeframe of 36 months from study inclusion

07

Study locations

6 sites
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Jan 2033, 84 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2025
First posted
Jan 26, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2033
CompletionEst.
Jan 2033
Last update
Jan 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07366008
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2026
Start date
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 26, 2026

Study contacts

Eli Sihn S Steinskog, MD PhD
Contact
eli.sihn.samdal.steinskog@helse-bergen.no
0047

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion