ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07364318CUFM1DNUpdated Jan 23, 2026

Cognitive Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

An observational study in OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cognitive Functions, sponsored by Comenius University. Recruiting at 1 site in Slovakia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-23.

Sponsored by Comenius University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder and has been increasingly recognized as a contributor to cognitive decline and a potential risk factor for neurodegeneration. Previous studies have identified several associated comorbidities, including vascular dysfunction, metabolic alterations, and neuroinflammatory changes. However, the impact and underlying interplay of these pathophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood due to the lack of integrated, multidimensional assessment. This prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study aims to investigate cognition and OSA-related physiological and pathophysiological processes in 100 adults newly diagnosed with OSA, who have no history of chronic diseases (except for overweight and obesity) and are not receiving chronic medication. A subgroup of patients with moderate to severe OSA indicated for positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy will be followed to evaluate its long-term effects on cognitive function and related mechanisms. All participants will undergo polysomnography (PSG), comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, brain MRI with volumetric analysis, biomarker profiling from blood and saliva, and evaluation of endothelial function, baroreflex sensitivity, and gut microbiome composition at baseline and after 12 months. PAP adherence will be continuously monitored. The primary objective of this study is to characterize the profile of cognitive impairment associated with OSA. Secondary exploratory analyses will focus on factors contributing to neurocognitive dysfunction in OSA.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background OSA is a multifaceted sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to significant reductions in airflow and oxygenation. Beyond its primary respiratory manifestations, OSA is associated with major comorbidities such as cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive disorders, affecting overall health and quality of life. Epidemiological data suggest that OSA affects nearly one billion individuals worldwide, yet remains markedly underdiagnosed, particularly in middle-aged and older adults. Chronic intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation have been implicated in the disruption of neural networks involved in attention, executive function, memory, and emotion regulation. Neuroimaging studies further support these findings, revealing region-specific brain alterations such as hippocampal and cortical atrophy, white-matter hyperintensities, and changes in cerebral perfusion and metabolism. These mechanisms may contribute to accelerated brain aging and increase the vulnerability to neurodegenerative processes. With the global rise in dementia and aging populations, identifying modifiable contributors to cognitive decline is critical. Given that OSA is a treatable condition, timely diagnosis and effective management may represent one of the most accessible interventions to prevent or delay cognitive deterioration in vulnerable populations.
  2. Aim of the study The primary aim of this study is to perform a detailed cognitive assessment in patients with OSA. The investigators seek to analyze the baseline prevalence, severity, and pattern of cognitive deficits in this population to gain a clearer understanding of the initial cognitive status from which potential therapeutic or disease-related changes may occur. The secondary aims of this study are exploratory. The investigators plan to investigate potential associations between cognitive impairment and a spectrum of PSG, sleep-related, neuroimaging, anthropometric, laboratory, and vascular measures. The investigators aim to compare the sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with that of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate the longitudinal effects of PAP therapy on cognition and the related processes under investigation.
  3. Inclusion criteria Patients with newly diagnosed OSA who have no history of other chronic diseases except for overweight and obesity, are not taking any medication, and are aged between 18 and 65 years.
  4. Study methodology This is a prospective, observational, single-centre cohort study conducted at the Sleep Laboratory of the 1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and University Hospital Bratislava. One hundred adults with OSA will be examined at baseline and after 12 months. As part of standard clinical care, all participants will undergo overnight diagnostic PSG to confirm the OSA diagnosis and determine its severity. Patients indicated for PAP therapy will start treatment according to clinical indications, with adherence monitored via device memory cards. Additional research assessments include neuropsychological testing, brain MRI with volumetry, blood and saliva biomarker analysis, assessment of vascular functions, anthropometric measurements, oxidative stress evaluation, and gut microbiome analysis. All assessments will be performed by trained research personnel in a standardized order. Participants will first be hospitalized to undergo PSG to confirm the OSA diagnosis. After confirmation, those meeting the inclusion criteria and providing informed consent will be enrolled in the study.
  5. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Participants may benefit from early detection of cognitive dysfunction, metabolic or vascular abnormalities, and sleep-related pathology. Risks associated with study participation are minimal and primarily related to standard blood sampling and mild discomfort during assessments. No experimental or invasive interventions are applied.
02

Conditions studied

  • OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Cognitive Functions

Keywords

  • Cognitive Function
  • Positive Airway Pressure Therapy
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Neuroimaging
  • Biomarkers
  • Vascular Changes
  • Metabolic Changes
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,240 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 475 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 105 across 666 observational studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Comenius University is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with newly diagnosed OSA who have no history of other chronic diseases except for overweight and obesity, are not taking any medication, and are aged between 18 and 65 years.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. .
  2. Age 18 - 65 years.
  3. Newly diagnosed OSA according to the criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Guidelines (overnight PSG with an AHI ≥5 events per hour, hypopneas defined by ≥ 10 seconds of airflow reduction accompanied by ≥ 3% desaturation or an arousal).
  4. Able to accomplish relevant tests and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of any chronic disease other than overweight and obesity.
  2. Severe psychiatric condition that could affect cognitive functions.
  3. Chronic use of medication or nicotine that may affect the study results.
  4. Prior neuropsychological assessment less than 6 months before the start of the research.
  5. Prior therapy for OSA (i.e., CPAP, upper airway surgery, or oral appliance).
  6. Motor or sensory deficits that would significantly complicate test administration.
  7. Patients who do not have Slovak as their native language actively used in daily communication.
  8. Considered by the study team as not suitable for enrollment based on clinical judgment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Newly diagnosed OSA

    Newly diagnosed OSA according to the criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Guidelines (overnight PSG with an AHI ≥5 events per hour, hypopneas defined by ≥ 10 seconds of airflow reduction accompanied by ≥ 3% desaturation or an arousal).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rey Auditory - Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    Measure of verbal episodic memory, encompassing immediate recall, learning across trials, delayed recall, and recognition. Units: total number of correctly recalled words (0-75); z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Figure Copy Task

    A visuoconstructional task used to assess visual perception, spatial planning, and visual memory. Units: score 0-24 points; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)

    A verbal fluency task requiring rapid generation of words beginning with specified letters. It assesses phonemic fluency, executive function, and lexical retrieval. Units: number of correct words generated per minute; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Category Fluency Test

    A semantic fluency measure where subjects list as many words from a given category. It evaluates semantic memory and executive retrieval processes. Units: number of correct words generated per minute; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Trail Making Test (TMT)

    A two-part test evaluating processing speed, visual search, attention, and task-switching. Units: completion time in seconds; z-score. Shorter completion times indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. The Stroop Color and Word Test

    Measure of selective attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. Units: completion time in seconds; z-score. Shorter completion times indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Digit Span

    A working memory test comprising forward and backward recall of digit sequences. Assesses attention, concentration, and short-term memory. Units: total score (0-14 points); z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    General cognition screening targeting attention, executive function, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, and orientation. Units: total score (0-30 points); ≥26 = normal cognition. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD - 7)

    A 7-item self-report questionnaire to screen and assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder. Items are rated on a 4-point scale. Units: total score (0-21 points); cut-off ≥ 10. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Patient´s Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 9)

    A 9-item scale assessing depression severity based on DSM IV criteria. Items are rated on a 4-point scale. Units: total score (0-27 points); cut-off ≥ 10. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Rey Auditory - Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) 12 moths

    Measure of verbal episodic memory, encompassing immediate recall, learning across trials, delayed recall, and recognition. Units: total number of correctly recalled words (0-75); z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  12. Figure Copy Task 12 months

    A visuoconstructional task used to assess visual perception, spatial planning, and visual memory. Units: score 0-24 points; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  13. Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) 12 months

    A verbal fluency task requiring rapid generation of words beginning with specified letters. It assesses phonemic fluency, executive function, and lexical retrieval. Units: number of correct words generated per minute; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  14. Category Fluency Test 12 months

    A semantic fluency measure where subjects list as many words from a given category. It evaluates semantic memory and executive retrieval processes. Units: number of correct words generated per minute; z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  15. Trail Making Test (TMT) 12 months.

    A two-part test evaluating processing speed, visual search, attention, and task-switching. Units: completion time in seconds; z-score. Shorter completion times indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  16. The Stroop Color and Word Test 12 months.

    Measure of selective attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. Units: completion time in seconds; z-score. Shorter completion times indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  17. Digit Span 12 months.

    A working memory test comprising forward and backward recall of digit sequences. Assesses attention, concentration, and short-term memory. Units: total score (0-14 points); z-score. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  18. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 12 months.

    General cognition screening targeting attention, executive function, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, and orientation. Units: total score (0-30 points); ≥26 = normal cognition. Higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  19. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD - 7) 12 months.

    A 7-item self-report questionnaire to screen and assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder. Items are rated on a 4-point scale. Units: total score (0-21 points); cut-off ≥ 10. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  20. Patient´s Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 9) 12 months.

    A 9-item scale assessing depression severity based on DSM IV criteria. Items are rated on a 4-point scale. Units: total score (0-27 points); cut-off ≥ 10. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI)

    A polysomnographic measure representing the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep. Units: events per hour. Higher scores indicate more severe OSA.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) 12 months

    A polysomnographic measure representing the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep. Units: events per hour. Higher scores indicate more severe OSA. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy Adherence

    Objective measure of treatment compliance obtained from PAP device data. Units: average hours of use per night. Higher scores indicate better adherence to therapy. Assessments will be performed after 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    A self-rated questionnaire comprising 19 items that evaluate sleep quality and disturbances over a one-month interval. Units: global PSQI score (0-21 points); cut-off ≥ 5. Higher scores indicate poorer overall sleep quality.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  5. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

    An 8-item self-report questionnaire measuring habitual daytime sleepiness in common situations. Units: total score (0-24 points); cut-off ≥ 10. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  6. Brain Volumetry

    Quantitative assessment of total and regional brain volumes will include total brain volume, gray and white matter volumes, hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, and other regional volumetric measures. Units: mL; changes in volumes reflect structural brain alterations.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  7. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²). Units: kg/m². Higher values indicate greater adiposity.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  8. Apolipoprotein E (APOE)

    Genotype Genetic biomarker associated with neurodegenerative risk. Units: genotype category (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4). ε4 allele presence indicates higher vulnerability to cognitive decline.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (pNfL)

    A biomarker of neuroaxonal injury. Units: pg/mL. Higher concentrations indicate greater neuronal damage.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  10. Total cholesterol

    Measure of circulating total cholesterol, representing the combined cholesterol content within all lipoprotein classes. Units: mmol/L. Higher values reflect a more adverse lipid profile.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  11. Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC)

    Measure of total antioxidant capacity in plasma and saliva. Units: mmol Trolox equivalents/L. Lower TEAC values indicate reduced antioxidant defense and increased susceptibility to oxidative stress.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  12. Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI)

    Measure of endothelial function assessed by pulse amplitude tonometry. RHI reflects the vasodilatory response of peripheral arteries following temporary occlusion. Units: ratio. Lower values indicate worse endothelial function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  13. Baroreflex Sensitivity

    Indicator of autonomic cardiovascular regulation measured via Finometer. Units: ms/mmHg. Higher values indicate better baroreflex control.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  14. Gut Microbiome Composition

    Analysis of microbial diversity and abundance from stool samples. Units: Shannon index and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Lower alpha diversity and altered beta diversity indicate dysbiosis.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • 1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia
    Bratislava, 813 72, Slovakia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sehr T, Akgun K, Benkert P, Kuhle J, Ziemssen T, Brandt MD. Effects of obstructive sleep apnea treatment on neurodegenerative biomarker neurofilament light chain and cognitive performance. J Sleep Res. 2024 Oct;33(5):e14164. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14164. Epub 2024 Feb 13. PubMed 38351662 ↗
  • Xue X, Zhao Z, Zhao LB, Gao YH, Xu WH, Cai WM, Chen SH, Li TJ, Nie TY, Rui D, Ma Y, Qian XS, Lin JL, Liu L. Gut microbiota changes in healthy individuals, obstructive sleep apnea patients, and patients treated using continuous positive airway pressure: a whole-genome metagenomic analysis. Sleep Breath. 2024 Nov 26;29(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03185-z. PubMed 39589660 ↗
  • Silva WA, Almeida-Pititto B, Santos RB, Aielo AN, Giatti S, Parise BK, Souza SP, Vivolo SF, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM, Drager LF. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with lower adiponectin and higher cholesterol levels independently of traditional factors and other sleep disorders in middle-aged adults: the ELSA-Brasil cohort. Sleep Breath. 2021 Dec;25(4):1935-1944. doi: 10.1007/s11325-021-02290-7. Epub 2021 Feb 15. PubMed 33590375 ↗
  • Salari N, Khazaie H, Abolfathi M, Ghasemi H, Shabani S, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, Rasoulpoor S, Khaledi-Paveh B. The effect of obstructive sleep apnea on the increased risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):219-231. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05765-3. Epub 2021 Nov 19. PubMed 34797460 ↗
  • Durtette A, Dargent B, Gierski F, Barbe C, Deslee G, Perotin JM, Henry A, Launois C. Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2024 Nov;123:7-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 22. PubMed 39226674 ↗
  • Bubu OM, Andrade AG, Umasabor-Bubu OQ, Hogan MM, Turner AD, de Leon MJ, Ogedegbe G, Ayappa I, Jean-Louis G G, Jackson ML, Varga AW, Osorio RS. Obstructive sleep apnea, cognition and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review integrating three decades of multidisciplinary research. Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Apr;50:101250. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101250. Epub 2019 Dec 12. PubMed 31881487 ↗
  • Xu H, Liu Y, Li C, Li X, Shen L, Wang H, Liu F, Zou J, Xia Y, Huang W, Liu Y, Gao Z, Fu Y, Wang F, Huang S, Song Z, Song F, Gao Y, Peng Y, Zou J, Zhu H, Liu S, Li L, Zhu X, Xiong Y, Hu Y, Yang J, Li Y, Gao F, Guo Q, Huang H, Zhang W, Li J, Chen Y, Dong P, Yang J, Lv J, Wang P, Sun Y, Qian B, Yaffe K, Guan J, Yi H, Leng Y, Yin S. Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Neuroimaging Biomarkers and Cognition in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;211(4):628-636. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202406-1170OC. PubMed 39998447 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study results will present the group as a whole, not individual patient data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 33 months after the start.

Of 258 non-industry observational studies under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 33 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 294 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2025
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jan 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07364318
Lead sponsor
Comenius University
Collaborators
University Hospital Bratislava, Slovak Academy of Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 23, 2026

Study contacts

Branislav Kollar, prof. MD PhD. MPH.
Contact
b.kollar.md@gmail.com
+421 948 334 417
Stela Biathova, MA
Contact
sbiathova@gmail.com
+421 905 218 668
Peter Turcani, prof. MD PhD.
study director · 1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion