ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07363720Updated Oct 30, 2026

A Trial of TAK-861 for the Treatment of Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

A Phase 3 interventional study of TAK-861 and Placebo in Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1) and Narcolepsy With Cataplexy, sponsored by Takeda. Active, not recruiting at 25 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Takeda · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 30, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of this study is to assess how effective TAK-861 is for treating narcolepsy type 1 and if this effect is maintained over time. Participants will take TAK-861 for a few months and if they meet certain criteria, they will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to continue taking TAK-861 or take placebo (fake medicine) for up to 4 weeks to see if their narcolepsy symptoms return.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called TAK-861. This study will look at how effective TAK-861 is for the treatment of narcolepsy type 1 and how well this effect is maintained over time. This study also evaluates how safe TAK-861 is and what adverse events may be associated with taking the drug and stopping the drug in participants with NT1.

The study will enroll approximately 88 participants. All participants will take TAK-861 during the open-label (OL) treatment period. Participants who meet certain criteria at the end of the OL Treatment Period will be randomized to one of two treatment groups for the up to 4-week double-blind randomized withdrawal (RW) Period. Participants will be randomized to one of the following treatment groups during the Double-blind RW Period:

  1. TAK-861 (same dose participant was taking at the end of the OL Treatment Period)
  2. Placebo

The randomized withdrawal period may last up to 4 weeks. Participants whose NT1 symptoms get worse during the RW period and whose Epworth Sleepiness Scale score rises above a certain score will stop the treatment and be invited to continue in a separate long term extension study. Participants who choose not to take part in the extension study will be followed-up for 4 weeks after their last dose of study drug. This multi-center trial will be conducted globally.

02

Conditions studied

  • Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1)
  • Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
03

In context

Narcolepsy

157 studies on the registry are indexed under Narcolepsy; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is above the median of 78 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Narcolepsy.

Browse Narcolepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,026 studies on the registry; 89 are open to participants now.

Of its 178 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 154 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The participant has a (BMI) within the range 18 to 40 kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2).
  2. The participant has an International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3) or International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition, Text Revision (ICSD-3-TR) diagnosis of NT1.
  3. The participant is positive for the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype Major Histocompatibility Complex, Class II, DQ Beta 1 (HLA-DQB1*06:02) or results from radioimmunoassay indicate the participant's CSF OX/hypocretin-1 concentration is ≤110 pg/mL (or less than one-third of the mean values obtained in normal participants within the same standardized assay).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The participant has a current medical disorder, other than narcolepsy with cataplexy, associated with EDS.
  2. The participant a) has a history of myocardial infarction, b) has a history of hepatic disease, thyroid disease, coronary artery disease, cardiac rhythm abnormality or heart failure, or c) has any medical condition (such as unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or gastrointestinal disease.
  3. The participant has current or recent (within 6 months) gastrointestinal disease that is expected to influence the absorption of drugs.
  4. The participant has a history of cancer in the past 5 years.
  5. The participant has a clinically significant history of head injury or head trauma.
  6. The participant has a history of epilepsy, seizure, or convulsion (except for a single febrile seizure in childhood).
  7. The participant has a history of cerebral ischemia, (less than 5 years from screening), intracranial aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Double-blind RW Period: TAK-861

    Participants on stable TAK 861 dose will receive the same dose of TAK-861 they were taking at the end of the OL treatment period, for up to 4 weeks in the double-blind RW period.

    Drug: TAK-861

  • Placebo comparator
    Double-blind RW Period: Placebo

    Participants will receive TAK-861 matching-placebo, for up to 4 weeks in the double-blind RW period.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • TAK-861 tablets

  • DrugPlacebo

    TAK-861-matching placebo tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Loss of Response in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During the Up to 4-Week RW Period

    The ESS provides individuals with 8 different situations of daily life and asks them how likely they are to fall asleep in those situations (scored 0 to 3) and to try to imagine their likelihood of dozing even if they have not actually been in the identical situation; the scores are summed to give an overall score of 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate stronger subjective daytime sleepiness, and scores below 10 are considered to be within normal range.

    Time frame: Up to 4-week RW period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From the End of the OL Treatment Period to Week 2 of the RW Period on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT)

    The MWT evaluates a person's ability to remain awake under soporific conditions for a defined period of time. Because there is no biological measure of wakefulness, wakefulness is measured indirectly by the inability or delayed tendency to fall asleep. This tendency to fall asleep is measured via electroencephalography (EEG)-derived sleep latency in the MWT. The MWT consists of four 40-minute sessions. Sleep latency in each wake trial will be recorded. Participants will be required to stay awake in between the 4 sessions.

    Time frame: From the end of the OL treatment period (Week 16) to Week 2 of the RW period (Week 18)

  2. Weekly Cataplexy Rate (WCR) at Week 2 of the RW Period

    Time frame: Week 2 of the RW period

  3. Change from the End of the OL Treatment Period to Week 2 of the RW Period in Mean Number of Lapses on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT)

    The PVT is a simple reaction performance task with a duration of 10 minutes that aims to measure sustained attention.

    Time frame: From the end of the OL treatment period (Week 16) to Week 2 of the RW period (Week 18)

  4. Number of Participants Reporting Much or Very Much Worse in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Week 2 of the RW Period

    The PGI-C is a participant self-rated scale to assess improvement in daytime sleepiness and overall narcolepsy symptoms. It measures change due to treatment relative to baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1 ("very much improved") to score of 7 ("very much worse").

    Time frame: Week 2 of the RW period

  5. Change from the End of the OL Treatment Period to Week 2 of the RW Period in Narcolepsy Severity Scale for Clinical Trials (NSS-CT) Total Score

    The NSS-CT is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire assesses the severity and consequences of the 5 major narcolepsy symptoms such as daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and disturbed night-time sleep (DNS) with a total score range of 0 to 57 (sum of 6 items that assess symptoms severity are rated using a six-point Likert scale \[0-5\] and 9 items that describe the symptom effect on daily life are rated using a four-point Likert scale \[0-3\]. Higher total scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: From the end of the OL treatment period (Week 16) to Week 2 of the RW period (Week 18)

  6. Change from the End of the OL Treatment Period to Week 2 of the RW Period in Functional Impacts of Narcolepsy Instrument (FINI) Domain Scores

    The FINI measures the functional impacts of narcolepsy across 6 domains. Each domain is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates the best health and 4 the worst.

    Time frame: From the end of the OL treatment period (Week 16) to Week 2 of the RW period (Week 18)

  7. Change from the End of the OL Treatment Period to Week 2 of the RW Period in Number of Correct Responses on the International Digit Symbol Substitution Test-symbols (iDSST-s)

    The iDSST-s is a processing speed test that is based on the pre-existing pencil and paper version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. The participants are presented with a legend that defines 9 symbols, with each symbol corresponding to a digit from 1 to 9. The participant is then presented with a conveyer belt in the middle of the screen that displays a series of empty boxes labelled with a number. The participant must select the symbol that corresponds to the number of a given highlighted box from symbol options presented at the bottom of the screen. The participant must try to place as many correct symbols in the boxes as possible over the duration of the test.

    Time frame: From the end of the OL treatment period (Week 16) to Week 2 of the RW period (Week 18)

  8. Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product. A TEAE is defined as any event emerging or manifesting at or after the initiation of treatment with a study intervention or medicinal product or any existing event that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the study intervention or medicinal product.

    Time frame: From Screening to End of study (approximately 31 weeks)

07

Study locations

25 sites
  • Takeda Site 15
    Redwood City, California 94063, United States
  • Takeda Site 19
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • Takeda Site 22
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Takeda Site 23
    Southfield, Michigan 48075, United States
  • Takeda Site 20
    Middletown, New Jersey 07748, United States
  • Takeda Site 24
    Durham, North Carolina 27710-4000, United States
  • Takeda Site 25
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Takeda Site 16
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45245, United States
  • Takeda Site 18
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Takeda Site 17
    Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
  • Takeda Site 21
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Takeda Site 1
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Takeda Site 2
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Takeda Site 3
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Takeda Site 4
    Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 19053, Germany
  • Takeda Site 5
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Takeda Site 6
    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna 40139, Italy
  • Takeda Site 7
    Rome, Lazio 00133, Italy
  • Takeda Site 8
    Heemstede, 2103 SW, Netherlands
  • Takeda Site 12
    Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava 01004, Spain
  • Takeda Site 11
    Alzira, Valencia 46600, Spain
  • Takeda Site 10
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Takeda Site 9
    Madrid, 28043, Spain
  • Takeda Site 13
    Barmelweid, Canton of Aargau 5017, Switzerland
  • Takeda Site 14
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Access criteria: IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 14 phase 3 interventional studies under Narcolepsy, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 30, 2026: primary completion Oct 2026 → Dec 2026 and completion Oct 2026 → Dec 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 7, 2026
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
StartActual
Jan 29, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 17, 2026was Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 17, 2026was Oct 2026
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2026→Dec 17, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
Study completion
Oct 2, 2026→Dec 17, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    Primary completion Oct 2, 2026→Dec 17, 2026
    Study completion Oct 2, 2026→Dec 17, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07363720
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Start date
Jan 29, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 17, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 17, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Oveporexton

Start the discussion