ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07360834PREDI-LYNCHUpdated Aug 3, 2026

Study Aiming to Test Whether Non-invasive Liquid Biopsies Can Safely Reduce Invasive Surveillance Methods in Lynch Syndrome

An interventional study of INVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY in Lynch Syndrome, sponsored by UNICANCER. Not yet recruiting at 9 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by UNICANCER · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lynch syndrome is an inherited genetic predisposition that increases the risk of developing several types of cancer, particularly colon and rectal cancers (colorectal cancer), as well as cancer of the uterine lining (endometrial cancer). It affects around 1 in 400 people in Europe.

Today, surveillance mainly relies on examinations such as colonoscopy (an examination of the colon using a camera) or gynaecological evaluations, sometimes accompanied by biopsies (the removal of a small tissue sample for microscopic analysis). Although effective, these procedures are invasive and demanding; they can affect quality of life and discourage some individuals from adhering to their recommended surveillance programme.

The European project PREDI-LYNCH is exploring an additional pathway that is simpler and better tolerated. This project relies on "liquid biopsies", meaning tests performed on easily collected samples such as blood, urine, stool, and vaginal swabs for women with a uterus. The PREDI-LYNCH study aims to determine whether these non-invasive tests could enable personalised surveillance and potentially increase the interval between more burdensome procedures, while maintaining a high level of medical safety.

Read the detailed description

This European clinical study evaluates whether non-invasive liquid biopsy tests (blood, urine, stool and vaginal samples when applicable) can improve cancer surveillance in adults with genetically confirmed Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or EPCAM). The trial compares two strategies: standard follow-up with colonoscopy every 18 months versus an approach combining annual liquid biopsies with a colonoscopy every 36 months. The main outcome is the number of new cancer cases diagnosed, confirmed by standard procedures. Secondary outcomes include early cancer detection, lesion identification, diagnostic timing, feasibility, quality of life and healthcare use. Each positive test leads to fast confirmatory exams. The aim is to determine if liquid biopsies can safely reduce invasive procedures while maintaining effective cancer monitoring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lynch Syndrome

Keywords

  • Lynch Syndrome, hereditary cancer, MMR deficiency, Liquid biopsies, cancer early detection.
  • Lynch Syndrome, MMR deficiency, Liquid biopsies
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis

145 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 200 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis studies →

Lead sponsor

UNICANCER is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant must have signed a written prior to any trial specific procedures. When the patient is physically unable to give their written consent, a trusted person of their choice, independent from the investigator or the sponsor, can confirm in writing the patient's consent.
  2. Age 35-80
  3. Genetically confirmed class 4-5 (likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) variant, respectively) in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or EPCAM gene.
  4. The participant should be insurance covered for the financial costs of the standard surveillance and healthcare related to LS, such as affiliated to Social Security System

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previously performed proctocolectomy or equivalent (entire colon and rectum removed)
  2. Active treatment for cancer within 2 years prior to inclusion.
  3. therapy within 12 months
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Participants unwilling or unable to comply with the medical follow-up required by the trial because of geographic, familial, social, or psychological reasons.
  6. Persons deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental arm

    Biopsies Liquids +/- Colonoscopy

    Diagnostic Test: INVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY

  • Other
    Control arm

    Colonoscopy each 18 months

    Diagnostic Test: INVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testINVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY

    The trial compares two strategies: standard follow-up with colonoscopy every 18 months versus an approach combining annual liquid biopsies with a colonoscopy every 36 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine whether a multimodal surveillance strategy - using combining concurrent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), urine tumor DNA (utDNA), vaginal swab tumor DNA (vsDNA), and stool (qFIT) - is non-inferior to standard-of-care screening surveillance

    Number of newly diagnosed histologically confirmed invasive cancers (CRC, EC, UC) during surveillance and follow-up phases, expressed as cumulative incidence (%) and incidence per 1,000 person-years.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 12, month 24, month 36, month 48

07

Study locations

9 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gallon R, Brekelmans C, Martin M, Bours V, Schamschula E, Amberger A, Muleris M, Colas C, Dekervel J, De Hertogh G, Coupier J, Colleye O, Sepulchre E, Burn J, Brems H, Legius E, Wimmer K. Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency mimicking Lynch syndrome is associated with hypomorphic mismatch repair gene variants. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 May 24;8(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00603-z. PubMed 38789506 ↗
  • Wu J, Lin Y, Yang K, Liu X, Wang H, Yu T, Tao R, Guo J, Chen L, Cheng H, Lou F, Cao S, Yu W, Hu H, Ye D. Clinical effectiveness of a multitarget urine DNA test for urothelial carcinoma detection: a double-blinded, multicenter, prospective trial. Mol Cancer. 2024 Mar 19;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01974-4. PubMed 38504268 ↗
  • Willis J, Lefterova MI, Artyomenko A, Kasi PM, Nakamura Y, Mody K, Catenacci DVT, Fakih M, Barbacioru C, Zhao J, Sikora M, Fairclough SR, Lee H, Kim KM, Kim ST, Kim J, Gavino D, Benavides M, Peled N, Nguyen T, Cusnir M, Eskander RN, Azzi G, Yoshino T, Banks KC, Raymond VM, Lanman RB, Chudova DI, Talasaz A, Kopetz S, Lee J, Odegaard JI. Validation of Microsatellite Instability Detection Using a Comprehensive Plasma-Based Genotyping Panel. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):7035-7045. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1324. Epub 2019 Aug 4. PubMed 31383735 ↗
  • van Liere ELSA, Jacobs IL, Dekker E, Jacobs MAJM, de Boer NKH, Ramsoekh D. Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is burdensome and frequently delayed. Fam Cancer. 2023 Oct;22(4):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s10689-023-00333-4. Epub 2023 May 12. PubMed 37171677 ↗
  • Moller P, Seppala T, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Evans DG, Lindblom A, Macrae F, Blanco I, Sijmons R, Jeffries J, Vasen H, Burn J, Nakken S, Hovig E, Rodland EA, Tharmaratnam K, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Hill J, Wijnen J, Green K, Lalloo F, Sunde L, Mints M, Bertario L, Pineda M, Navarro M, Morak M, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Frayling IM, Plazzer JP, Pylvanainen K, Sampson JR, Capella G, Mecklin JP, Moslein G; Mallorca Group (http://mallorca-group.eu). Cancer incidence and survival in Lynch syndrome patients receiving colonoscopic and gynaecological surveillance: first report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):464-472. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309675. Epub 2015 Dec 9. PubMed 26657901 ↗
  • Stoffel EM, Murphy CC. Epidemiology and Mechanisms of the Increasing Incidence of Colon and Rectal Cancers in Young Adults. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):341-353. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.055. Epub 2019 Aug 5. PubMed 31394082 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 86. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2026
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2030
Last update
Aug 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07360834
Lead sponsor
UNICANCER
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Amina Ghorbel, PhD
Contact
a-ghorbel@unicancer.fr
+33 (0) 6 68 50 20 12
Chrystelle Colas, Oncogeneticist
study director · Institut Curie
Toni Seppala, Surgeon
study director · TAMPERE University (Finland)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion