ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07357636Updated Jan 28, 2026

Longitudinal Cohort Study of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Solid Tumor Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

An observational study in Solid Tumor, Immune-Related Adverse Events and Immunotherapy Toxicity, sponsored by Shantou University Medical College. Recruiting at 6 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by Shantou University Medical College · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2019; still recruiting 7 years 10 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
940
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 12 studies in Neurotoxicity Syndromes with a site in China — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Neurotoxicity Syndromes · China.

Started
2019
the only one that year
Observational
3 of 12
2 open now
Registered
12th of 12
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 12
Shantou University Medical College

Among the 12 studies in Neurotoxicity Syndromes with a site in China, this one is the only one that started in 2019, is one of 3 observational ones, and was the 12th registered.

Neurotoxicity Syndromes

133 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurotoxicity Syndromes; 17 are open to participants now.

Browse Neurotoxicity Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 12 studies in Neurotoxicity Syndromes with a site in China are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in China have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in China →

Who these studies take

Of the 15 Neurotoxicity Syndromes studies recruiting now, 11 (73%) set no upper age limit and 1 (7%) stops at 75 or younger; none take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 12 studies in Neurotoxicity Syndromes with a site in China, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of solid tumors but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect virtually any organ system. While many irAEs are well recognized, neurological, neurocognitive, and psychiatric toxicities remain diagnostically challenging, potentially severe, and poorly understood, with limited predictive biomarkers.

This prospective longitudinal observational cohort study enrolls adult patients with solid tumors initiating a new course of ICI therapy. Participants undergo standardized baseline clinical assessments and biospecimen collection prior to ICI initiation, followed by longitudinal follow-up and event-driven sampling. Patients are dynamically assigned to organ-specific irAE cohorts based on the first clinically significant irAE that dictates management. Patients without grade ≥2 irAEs during follow-up serve as a comparator control cohort.

The primary objective is to characterize longitudinal immune and inflammatory biomarker trajectories associated with the development of irAEs and to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers, with particular emphasis on neurological, neurocognitive, and psychiatric toxicities. Integrated clinical, imaging, and multi-omics data will be used to elucidate mechanisms of toxicity and inform future risk stratification and personalized management strategies.

Read the detailed description

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 pathways have demonstrated substantial clinical benefit across multiple solid malignancies. However, their mechanism of action can also lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may involve dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary, endocrine, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, renal, hematologic, neurological, and psychiatric systems. Neurological and neurocognitive irAEs, in particular, are uncommon but potentially devastating and remain poorly characterized.

This study is a hybrid prospective longitudinal observational cohort designed to move beyond reactive identification of irAEs toward proactive prediction and mechanistic understanding. Adult patients with solid tumors initiating a new ICI regimen are enrolled prior to treatment initiation. Longitudinal clinical data, imaging, and biospecimens are collected at predefined intervals and at the time of suspected irAE onset when feasible.

Participants are assigned to event-defined cohorts based on the first grade ≥2 irAE that drives clinical management, including neuro-sensory, gastrointestinal/hepatic, rheumatologic/musculoskeletal, vascular/renal, hematologic, multi-organ, or control (no significant irAE) cohorts. Deep phenotyping and multi-omics analyses-including immune cell profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiome analyses-are performed to identify biomarkers associated with irAE risk, severity, and outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Solid Tumor
  • Immune-Related Adverse Events
  • Immunotherapy Toxicity

Keywords

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Immunotherapy
  • Biomarkers
  • Neurotoxicity
  • Neuroimmune adverse events
  • immune related adverse events
  • PD-1 blocker
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed solid malignancies who are initiating a new immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen, either as standard of care or within an approved clinical trial. Participants are enrolled prior to the first immune checkpoint inhibitor dose and followed longitudinally to assess the development of immune-related adverse events and associated immune and inflammatory biomarker changes.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • confirmed solid
  • Planned initiation of a new regimen (monotherapy or combination) as standard of care or on an approved clinical trial
  • Ability to provide
  • Baseline study assessments and biospecimen collection completed prior to first ICI dose
  • of at least 6 months as determined by treating oncologist
  • Availability of or willingness to undergo biopsy if archival tissue is unavailable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled medical, psychiatric, or social conditions that would interfere with study participation or data interpretation
  • Chronic systemic exceeding 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent within 14 days prior to enrollment (excluding inhaled, topical, or physiologic replacement doses)
  • Prior solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Untreated, symptomatic, or progressing (treated and stable brain metastases allowed if off systemic for at least 7 days)
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide required baseline biospecimens
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
940 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Neuro-Sensory irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop a grade ≥2 neurological, neurocognitive, psychiatric, ocular inflammatory, or peripheral nervous system immune-related adverse event.

  • Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-mediated colitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, or related gastrointestinal toxicities.

  • Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop grade ≥2 inflammatory arthritis, myositis, polymyalgia rheumatica-like syndromes, or related musculoskeletal toxicities.

  • Vascular and Renal irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop grade ≥2 myocarditis, vasculitis, nephritis, or other vascular or renal immune-mediated toxicities.

  • Hematologic irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-mediated cytopenias or other hematologic toxicities.

  • Multi-Organ irAE Cohort

    Participants who develop two or more distinct grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events involving different organ systems.

  • Control Cohort

    Participants who do not develop any grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events during the defined follow-up period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Clinical Resolution of Immune-Related Adverse Events (Days)

    Among participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the time from irAE diagnosis and initiation of organ-specific treatment (per institutional guidelines) to achievement of organ-specific clinical resolution will be recorded. Criteria for clinical resolution differ by organ system and are defined according to established consensus guidelines, as specified in the corresponding secondary outcome measures.

    Time frame: From irAE diagnosis through up to 24 months of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuro-Sensory irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score ≤2

    Among participants with immune-mediated neurological events (e.g., encephalitis, myelitis, plexopathy), functional status will be assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale. An mRS score ≤2 (slight disability, able to live independently) is a widely accepted threshold for favorable neurological outcome in neuroimmunology clinical trials.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis

  2. Neuro-Sensory irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with Objective Improvement on Nerve Conduction Studies

    Among participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy, electrophysiologic improvement will be assessed using nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Objective improvement is defined as ≥20% improvement in motor or sensory nerve action potential amplitude or conduction velocity compared with the acute phase, according to EFNS/PNS criteria.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis

  3. Psychiatric and Cognitive irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score <10

    Among participants with immune-mediated major depressive episodes, depressive symptoms will be assessed using the PHQ-9. A score \<10 represents remission or mild symptoms and is an internationally accepted threshold distinguishing clinically significant depression from response/remission.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after initiation of targeted treatment

  4. Psychiatric and Cognitive irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with ≥0.5 Standard Deviation Improvement on ≥2 Standardized Neuropsychological Tests

    Among participants with immune-mediated cognitive impairment, standardized neuropsychological test batteries (including the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and Trail Making Test Part B) will be administered. Clinically meaningful cognitive improvement is defined as ≥0.5 standard deviation improvement from the acute phase in at least two distinct cognitive domains.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis

  5. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with ≤3 Bowel Movements per Day and No Hematochezia

    Among participants with immune-mediated colitis, clinical remission will be assessed. ≤3 bowel movements per day without hematochezia is a widely accepted clinical remission criterion in colitis clinical trials.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy

  6. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤1.5 × Upper Limit of Normal

    Among participants with immune-mediated hepatitis, biochemical remission will be assessed. ALT ≤1.5 × ULN is a commonly accepted biochemical remission criterion in drug-induced liver injury trials.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy

  7. Rheumatologic and Musculoskeletal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10

    Among participants with immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis, disease activity will be assessed using the CDAI. A CDAI score ≤10 defines low disease activity and is an established rheumatologic threshold.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy

  8. Rheumatologic and Musculoskeletal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with ≥20% Improvement in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT-8) Score

    Among participants with immune-mediated myositis, muscle strength will be assessed using the MMT-8 score. A ≥20% improvement from the acute phase is an established clinically meaningful threshold in myositis trials.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis

  9. Renal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Serum Creatinine Recovery to Within 1.3 × Baseline

    Among participants with immune-mediated nephritis, renal recovery will be assessed. Serum creatinine recovery to within 1.3 × baseline represents a stringent and clinically meaningful recovery criterion per KDIGO acute kidney injury guidelines.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis

  10. Hematologic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Sustained Hematologic Response (CTCAE v5.0 Grade ≤1 for ≥4 Weeks)

    Among participants with immune-mediated cytopenias, hematologic remission is defined as maintenance of CTCAE v5.0 grade ≤1 blood counts (e.g., platelets ≥75 ×10⁹/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 ×10⁹/L) for at least 4 weeks without ongoing transfusion or growth factor support.

    Time frame: Within 12 weeks after initiation of first-line immunosuppressive therapy

  11. Hematologic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Normalized Lactate Dehydrogenase and Stable Hemoglobin

    Among participants with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, hemolysis control is defined as normalization of lactate dehydrogenase with stable hemoglobin levels for ≥7 days without transfusion support.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after initiation of treatment

  12. Multi-Organ irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants without Any New or Worsening ≥Grade 3 Immune-Related Adverse Events Across Organ Systems

    Among participants with multi-organ irAEs, overall toxicity control is defined as absence of any new or worsening grade ≥3 irAE in any organ system following initiation of treatment.

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks after initiation of combined immunosuppressive therapy

  13. Multi-Organ irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission for Multi-Organ irAE

    The proportion of participants requiring intensive care unit admission due to the severity of multi-organ immune-related adverse events will be recorded as an objective marker of disease severity.

    Time frame: irAE diagnosis through resolution or up to 24 weeks

  14. Control Cohort (No Grade ≥2 irAE): Duration of Immunotherapy without Grade ≥2 Immune-Related Adverse Events (Months)

    Among participants who do not develop grade ≥2 irAEs, treatment tolerability will be assessed as the time from ICI initiation to first occurrence of grade ≥2 irAE, disease progression, death, or treatment discontinuation.

    Time frame: From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose

  15. Control Cohort (No Grade ≥2 irAE): Proportion of Participants Completing Planned Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Course per Protocol

    Among participants without grade ≥2 irAEs, the proportion completing the planned ICI treatment course as scheduled will be recorded as a complementary measure of treatment tolerability.

    Time frame: From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Baseline Characteristics \& Demographics: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline body weight and height, diagnosis, treatment history, relevant comorbidities, smoking/alcohol status. Exposure/Treatment Data: Specific checkpoint inhibitor(s) received, dosing regimen, treatment start and end dates, medications. Laboratory \& Diagnostic Data: Serial laboratory test results, key imaging findings relevant to irAEs, pathology reports. Outcomes: CTCAE grades, date to primary outcomes, management strategies. Oncologic Outcomes: Tumor response assessments. Supporting Documents for Data Interpretation.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: 2026.3 to 2029.1

Access criteria: The de-identified IPD and supporting documents will be made available to qualified researchers worldwide upon request. Researchers will have access to the fully de-identified individual participant data listed in the previous section, along with the supporting documents including: the final study protocol, statistical analysis plan, the annotated case report forms. The data dictionary. All data will be anonymized in accordance with the HIPAA Safe Harbor method. Interested researchers must submit a formal research proposal outlining their study objectives, analysis plan, and ethical considerations via email for review by our Data Access Committee. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Use Agreement that legally binds them to use the data only for the approved purpose, maintain data security, and prevent re-identification or redistribution. Data will then be securely transferred via encrypted file sharing or made available through a controlled-access repository

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2029, 128 months after the start.

Of 20 observational studies under Neurotoxicity Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18. This study's planned 128 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 16, 2025
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
StartActual
Jan 10, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Sep 10, 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 10, 2029
Last update
Jan 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07357636
Lead sponsor
Shantou University Medical College
Responsible party
Weidong Wang (Associate Professor, MD, Shantou University Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Jan 10, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 10, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Yifei Ma, MD
Contact
myf61872169@163.com
8618883852716

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion