ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07333053Updated Sep 11, 2026

Clinical Efficacy of Transarterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer

An interventional study of Transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC) and Intravenous Chemotherapy(IVC) in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. It aims to investigate whether intensive transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC) followed by sequential intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) is clinically more effective than IVC alone in the treatment of unresectable colorectal cancer (uCRC).

Read the detailed description

CRC is the third leading cause of new cancer cases and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Current therapeutic modalities for CRC include surgical resection, IVC, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and their combinations. As a mainstream systemic treatment for CRC, IVC leads to widespread drug distribution but relatively low intratumoral drug accumulation. Compared with IVC, TAIC involves selective arterial catheterization to deliver chemotherapeutic agents directly to the tumor feeding vessels. Hepatic tumors receive their blood supply predominantly through branches of the hepatic artery. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) yields significantly superior outcomes compared to IVC and is currently widely employed for the treatment of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. HAIC in combination with IVC can offer long-term durable disease control in the clinical treatment of liver cancer compared with IVC. CRC is also predominantly grown through angiogenesis. Therefore, we raise the question whether sequential IVC administered after intensive TAIC achieves better clinical efficacy than IVC alone for the treatment of uCRC. However, no prospective clinical trials have been conducted to compare the efficacy of these two strategies. This prospective study was therefore designed to fill this clinical knowledge gap. We hypothesize that intensive TAIC followed by sequential IVC yields superior clinical efficacy compared with IVC alone for the treatment of uCRC. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. It aims to investigate whether intensive TAIC followed by sequential IVC is clinically more effective than IVC alone in the treatment of uCRC. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated into two groups upon enrolment: the intervention group (TAIC group) and the control group (IVC group). Patients will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio with no blinding implemented. Randomization will be conducted by an independent trial statistician via a secure system with complete allocation concealment using the permuted block randomization method. Stratification factors consist of primary tumor location, presence of liver metastases, RAS/BRAF mutational status, and participating study center. Patients in the control group will receive FOLFOX-based IVC every 2 weeks for a total duration of 8 weeks. Patients in the TAIC group will receive FOLFOX-based TAIC at Week 0 and Week 4 and receive FOLFOX-based IVC at Week 2 and Week 6. For patients with CRLM, targeted agent selection is determined based on the RAS and BRAF mutational status and the primary tumor location. The primary endpoint is ORR. The secondary endpoints include Quality-of-life (QoL), clinical complete response (cCR) rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, the rate of conversion to resection (CTR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses will be conducted for both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and the per-protocol (PP) population. Safety analyses will be based on patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study treatment. Categorical variables will be presented as counts and percentages, while continuous variables will be presented as means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used for between-group comparisons of categorical variables. Continuous variables will be compared using Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Longitudinal QoL scores will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements, which naturally accommodate missing data under the missing at random assumption. For time-to-event endpoints of OS and PFS, the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis will be applied. Between-group survival differences will be assessed using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be estimated from Cox regression models. All statistical tests will be two-sided, and a P value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses will be performed using the current version of R software. Patients in the IVC group will receive FOLFOX-based IVC every 2 weeks for a total duration of 8 weeks. The FOLFOX regimen consists of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and leucovorin (400 mg/m²), each administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, and fluorouracil (2400 mg/m²) administered as a 44-hour continuous intravenous infusion.

For patients with CRLM, targeted therapy will be selected according to RAS/BRAF status and primary tumor side. Cetuximab will be administered by intravenous injection for the treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided CRLM. Bevacizumab will be administered by intravenous injection for the treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type right-sided CRLM and RAS/BRAF mutant CRLM irrespective of primary tumor location. Patients in the TAIC group will receive FOLFOX-based TAIC at Week 0 and Week 4 and receive FOLFOX-based IVC at Week 2 and Week 6. The FOLFOX-based TAIC consists of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and leucovorin (400 mg/m²), each administered as a 2-hour transarterial infusion, and fluorouracil (2400 mg/m²) administered as a 44-hour continuous transarterial infusion. The IVC and targeted therapy regimens are the same as those in the IVC group. The dosage-calculation strategies of anticancer drugs, drug exposure and infusion durations, and supportive care, including symptom management and prevention of complications, do not differ significantly between TAIC and IVC groups. Treatment will be continued until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or surgical resection. Prior to each TAIC procedure, the right femoral artery will be punctured using the Seldinger technique according to tumour vascular supply. A microcatheter will be advanced into the tumour-feeding branch of the superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery or internal iliac artery. Chemotherapeutic agents will be administered through the microcatheter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Unresectable Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Transarterial Infusion Chemotherapy
  • Bevacizumab
  • Cetuximab
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • FOLFOX Protocol
  • Unresectable
  • Clinical Trial
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Study population:

Patients who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are eligible for enrolment and study treatment.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Histopathologically confirmed CRC adenocarcinoma;
  3. Locally advanced CRC confirmed as clinical T4 stage on CT/MRI imaging, with or without synchronous liver ;
  4. For patients with CRLM, hepatic tumor burden shall be lower than the burden of the primary colorectal lesion. Consequently, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) agree by consensus that CRC should be a priority target for treatment.
  5. No prior administration of chemotherapy, targeted therapy or radiotherapy for the current ;
  6. Adequate haematological, heart, liver and renal functions are required, with the following specific criteria: white blood cell count≥4×109 /L, neutrophils≥1.5×109 /L, ≥100×10⁹ /L, ≥100 g/L, total ≤34.2 μmol/L, ≤100 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase≤100 IU/L, serum creatinine ≤133 μmol/L or rate≥60 mL/min, and urine protein/creatinine\<1;
  7. Estimated survival is more than 3 months;
  8. (ECOG) performance status score ≤ 2;
  9. All the patients in this study are required to sign an form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients have other primary malignant tumors;
  2. Patients with recurrent CRC;
  3. Patients with distant besides synchronous hepatic metastases (e.g., pulmonary, bone, or );
  4. For patients with CRLM, the MDT consensus recommends a liver-first treatment strategy to avoid the risk of rapid hepatic lesion progression;
  5. CRC patients with gastrointestinal perforation
  6. Patients with malignant bowel obstruction to conservative management;
  7. Patients are allergic to the antitumor agents;
  8. Women pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant;
  9. Patients receiving other antitumor therapies, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy or radiotherapy;
  10. Patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TAIC Group

    Patients in the TAIC group will receive FOLFOX-based TAIC at Week 0 and Week 4 and receive FOLFOX-based IVC at Week 2 and Week 6. The FOLFOX-based TAIC consists of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and leucovorin (400 mg/m²), each administered as a 2-hour transarterial infusion, and fluorouracil (2400 mg/m²) administered as a 44-hour continuous transarterial infusion. Before placing a microcatheter into the feeding artery of the CRC, transarterial chemoembolization is performed for the liver metastases in patients with CRLM. The iodized oil emulsion is prepared by mixing 4 mL of iodized oil with 20 mg of oxaliplatin powder. Through the microcatheter, 0.5 mL of the iodized oil emulsion is slowly injected into the liver tumors via the feeding arterial branches. The technical endpoint of embolization is the absence of additional tumor staining or stasis/near stasis of the tumor-feeding arteries. The IVC and targeted therapy regimens are the same as those in the IVC group.

    Procedure: Transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC)

  • Active comparator
    IVC group

    Patients in the IVC group will receive FOLFOX-based IVC every 2 weeks for a total duration of 8 weeks. The FOLFOX regimen consists of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and leucovorin (400 mg/m²), each administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, and fluorouracil (2400 mg/m²) administered as a 44-hour continuous intravenous infusion. For patients with CRLM, targeted therapy will be selected according to RAS/BRAF status and primary tumor side. Cetuximab will be administered by intravenous injection for the treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided CRLM. Bevacizumab will be administered by intravenous injection for the treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type right-sided CRLM and RAS/BRAF mutant CRLM irrespective of primary tumor location.

    Procedure: Intravenous Chemotherapy(IVC)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC)

    TAIC can increase the local intra-tumoral concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents by intensifying drug delivery into the tumor via super-selective catheterization of the tumor-feeding artery, and meanwhile reduce systematic toxicity.

  • ProcedureIntravenous Chemotherapy(IVC)

    Intravenous administration of chemotherapeutic agents is the mainstay of chemotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective response rate

    Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 for CRC and modified RECIST criteria for CRLM.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item QoL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items covering five functioning scales (physical, social, emotional, role, and cognitive), nine symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbances, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health status scale. Referring to a recall period of one-week (except for physical function, which does not refer to a recall period at all), patients indicate their answers on a 4-point Likert scale. Linear converted scale scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the functioning scales and on the global health status scale indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores on the symptom scales indicate greater symptom burden.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Clinical complete response

    Clinical complete response is defined as no visible tumor on imaging examination.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Pathological complete response

    The pathological complete response is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells upon microscopic examination of the tumor during surgery.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. The rate of conversion to resectable status

    Assessment of resectability represents a complex biological and technical decision; definitions of resectability vary substantially and are contingent on technical expertise, institutional surgical volume, institutional experience, and access to multidisciplinary oncological care. For the present clinical trial, the following resectability criteria will be applied: (i) Following 4 cycles of conversion therapy, simultaneous or staged complete surgical resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases can be performed. (ii) The primary lesion can be resected en bloc with R0 margins. (iii) Liver metastases can be treated with radical ablation alone or combined with radical surgical resection to achieve R0 margins; the future liver remnant constitutes no less than 30%-40% of the total liver volume. (iv) Patients maintain acceptable general status and have no additional distant metastases precluding local radical treatment. (v) Regional lymph node metastases are amenable to complete surg

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Overall survival

    Overall survival is calculated from the date of randomisation until death. Participants who are alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the latest time seen alive.

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Progression-free survival

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to progression or death.

    Time frame: 3 years

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Adverse events (AEs) include chemotherapy-related and catheter-related complications, which will be graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 6.0.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
    Xicheng, Beijing Municipality 100053, China
    Recruiting
    • Quanda Liu Chief physician, MD · Contacthnzyydxwjp@163.com · 01088001037
    • · Contacthnzyydxwjp@163.com
    • Liuxin Duan, MD · Principal investigator
    • Li Yao, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang J, Sun Y, Chen L, Wang Z, Li K, Guo Y, Yao L, Duan L, Liu Q. FOLFOX-based transarterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer: protocol of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase II trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Sep 11;16(9):e119746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119746. PubMed 42731846 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — At present, this study remains in the active implementation phase. Given that individual participant data (IPD) contains sensitive personal privacy information of research subjects, the investigators will not share the IPD with external researchers temporarily, in order to strictly comply with ethical requirements and fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of study participants.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 21 months after the start.

Of 898 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 955 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2025
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
StartActual
Mar 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07333053
Collaborators
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, The Central Hospital of Handan City, The First People's Hospital of Jiujiang City, Changzhi Medical College, Zibo Boshan District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Hebei Yixian Hospital, Baoding Mancheng District People's Hospital, The Shanghai Yangpu Central Hospital
Responsible party
Quanda Liu (Chief physician, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
Start date
Mar 20, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Quanda Liu Chief physician, MD
Contact
hnzyydxwjp@163.com
01088001037
Junpeng Wang, MD
Contact
hnzyydxwjp@163.com
Quanda Liu, MD
principal investigator · Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion