CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07331584Updated Jan 12, 2026

Elastic Band Versus Free Weight Resistance Training in Phase 2 of CABG Patients.

An interventional study of dumbell and thera band in CABG, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-12.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study compares the effects of elastic band and free weights on functional capacity, lung function and quality of life in phase 2 coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Resistance training is vital in cardiac rehabilitation for improving physical function, strength, and independence. These patients typically experience reduced functional capacity and lung function due to post-surgical deconditioning and inactivity, which can also impact quality of life.Determining whether elastic bands or free weights provide greater benefits in these areas may help optimize cardiac rehabilitation protocols by identifying a safe, effective, and accessible approach for improving patient outcomes. This research has the potential to guide evidence-based resistance training in post- coronary artery bypass grafting rehabilitation, ultimately supporting recovery and enhancing quality of life of patients.

Read the detailed description

Patients who undergo cardiac surgery frequently faces pulmonary complications. This study aims to compare the effects of elastic band and free weights on functional capacity, lung function and quality of life in phase 2 coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Resistance training is vital in cardiac rehabilitation for improving physical function, strength, and independence. These patients typically experience reduced functional capacity and lung function due to post-surgical deconditioning and inactivity, which can also impact quality of life. Determining whether elastic bands or free weights provide greater benefits in these areas may help optimize cardiac rehabilitation protocols by identifying a safe, effective, and accessible approach for improving patient outcomes.

This research has the potential to guide evidence-based resistance training in post- coronary artery bypass grafting rehabilitation, ultimately supporting recovery and enhancing quality of life of patients. By comparing the effects of elastic band versus free weights resistance training on functional capacity, pulmonary functioning and quality of life in phase 2 of coronary artery bypass grafting. It will be a randomized clinical trial. Age of selected patients will be between 45 to 65 years and data will be collected from them. There will be two groups i.e. group A will receive 10 min walk warm up after that resistance training of upper and lower limb by using dumb bells and group B will receive 10 min of walk as warm up after that resistance training of upper and lower limb by using elastic band. International physical activity questionnaire used for quality of life, 6 min walk test for functional capacity and forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity and peak expiratory flow rate for lung functioning.

Trial will be completed in 12 weeks (2x/week) after patients got discharged 4-8 weeks after the surgery and before and after each session, primary and secondary outcomes will be measured for both groups. After data collection, data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25

02

Conditions studied

  • CABG

Keywords

  • coronary artery bypass graft, resistance training, functional residual capacities, pulmonary function test, quality of life
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Male and female

  • Age (45-64)
  • Stable cardio vascular status
  • Able to participate in mild to moderate exercise
  • Must be in 4-8 week of CABG and medically cleared for phase 2.
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Unstable cardiovascular condition.

  • Pulmonary conditions
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Other major surgeries and comorbidities
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dumbell

    Group A will receive the exercises from dumb bells we will focus on both upper limb and lower limb the total session would be of 20-30 minutes, will be focusing on chest (pectoralis major), back (latissimus dorsi, rhomboids), legs (quadriceps, hamstring, glutes) and core (abdominals, lower back) and after that 5-7 min of cool down. Dyspnea will be measured.

    Other: dumbell · Other: thera band

  • Experimental
    elastic band

    Group B will receive the exercise form elastic band (TheraBand) for both upper limb and lower limb. Total session time would be 30 minutes will be focusing on chest (pectoralis major), back (latissimus dorsi, rhomboids), legs (quadriceps, hamstring, glutes) and core (abdominals, lower back) 10-12 reps and 1 set in starting progressively increased to 3 reps after that at the end of session 5-7 min cool down and gentle stretching 2 times per week for 12 weeks. Dyspnea should be monitored.

    Other: dumbell · Other: thera band

Interventions

  • Otherdumbell

    Group A will receive the exercises from dumb bells we will focus on both upper limb and lower limb the total session would be of 20-30 minutes, will be focusing on chest (pectoralis major), back (latissimus dorsi, rhomboids), legs (quadriceps, hamstring, glutes) and core (abdominals, lower back) and after that 5-7 min of cool down. Dyspnea will be measured.

  • Otherthera band

    Group B will receive the exercise form elastic band (TheraBand) for both upper limb and lower limb. Total session time would be 30 minutes will be focusing on chest (pectoralis major), back (latissimus dorsi, rhomboids), legs (quadriceps, hamstring, glutes) and core (abdominals, lower back) 10-12 reps and 1 set in starting progressively increased to 3 reps after that at the end of session 5-7 min cool down and gentle stretching 2 times per week for 12 weeks. Dyspnea should be monitored.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second

    Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) is a key lung function test measuring how much air you can forcefully blow out in the first second of a deep breath, indicating how quickly your airways empty.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. international physical activity questionnaire : Quality of life

    The international physical activity questionnaire is a widely used tool designed to assess physical activity levels among adults. It evaluates various types of activity, including walking, moderateintensity activities, and vigorous-intensity activities, over the past week. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scoring involves converting reported activity (walking, moderate, vigorous) into MET-minutes per week by multiplying minutes by MET values (3.3 for walking, 4 for moderate, 8 for vigorous). Scores are then categorized as Low, Moderate, or High, based on specific criteria like achieving ≥3000 MET-min/week (High) or meeting minimum days/minutes for moderate activity (e.g., ≥3 days vigorous or ≥5 days moderate/walking for Moderate), to assess overall activity levels.

    Time frame: 12 week

  3. 6 Minute Walk Test

    A 6 min walk test is easier, safer to administer, better tolerated and better reflects activity of daily Living than another walk test. The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) scoring primarily focuses on the total distance walked (6MWD) in meters, calculated by counting laps and adding any partial lap, noting rest times. Scores are interpreted using age/sex/height/weight-specific prediction equations (like those from the American Thoracic Society) to compare actual distance to expected normal, with lower scores indicating poorer function, though the longest distance from multiple tests is used to account for learning effects.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Forced Vital Capacity

    FVC, or Forced Vital Capacity, is a key measurement in spirometry (lung function tests) that quantifies the total amount of air you can forcefully exhale from your lungs after taking the deepest breath

    Time frame: 12 week

  5. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

    Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) measures the fastest speed you can forcefully exhale air from your lungs

    Time frame: 12 Week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sehat Medical Complex Hanjerwal
    Lahore, Punjab Province 42000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07331584
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
Start date
Apr 17, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 17, 2025
Completion
Dec 17, 2025
Last update
Jan 12, 2026

Study contacts

Riffat Malik
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion