CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07326774Updated Feb 23, 2026

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Spinal Surgery

An observational study in Postoperative Pain, Lumbar Spine Surgery and Postoperative Analgesia, sponsored by Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.

Sponsored by Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Lumbar spinal procedures are commonly associated with significant postoperative pain, which may impair early mobilization and increase opioid consumption. In routine clinical practice, QIPB is increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia to improve pain control and reduce opioid-related adverse effects.

Adult patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia will be followed according to routine clinical care. Postoperative analgesia will be managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using tramadol, with or without the addition of ultrasound-guided QIPB, based on the preference of the attending anesthesiologist. No intervention or treatment assignment will be performed by the investigators.

Postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesics, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction will be recorded during the first 24 hours after surgery. The findings of this study are expected to provide further clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of QIPB as part of multimodal analgesia in lumbar spinal surgery.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective observational cohort study conducted in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia. The study is designed to assess the effects of ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) on postoperative analgesia when used as part of routine multimodal pain management.

Eligible patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III and a body mass index below 35 kg/m² will be included after providing written informed consent. All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol as part of routine care. The decision to perform QIPB will be made by the attending anesthesiologist according to clinical judgment and routine practice, without any intervention or assignment by the research team.

Ultrasound-guided QIPB, when applied, will be performed bilaterally under sterile conditions in the prone position at the end of surgery. In patients who do not receive QIPB, the surgeon will perform local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) of the incision site as part of routine postoperative analgesia. Patients will be observed in two cohorts: those receiving PCA with LAI and those receiving PCA with QIPB.

Postoperative outcomes will be assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during movement. Secondary outcomes will include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesic requirement, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation level, and patient satisfaction assessed using a 5-point Likert scale at 24 hours. Any block-related complications will also be recorded.

Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to compare postoperative analgesic outcomes between the two cohorts. This observational study aims to reflect real-world clinical practice and contribute to the growing evidence on the role of QIPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Lumbar Spine Surgery
  • Postoperative Analgesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Quadro-Iliac Plane Block
  • QIPB
  • Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia
  • Lumbar Spinal Surgery
  • Postoperative Analgesia
  • Patient-Controlled Analgesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 102 across 608 observational studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients aged 18-65 years with ASA physical status I-III and body mass index \<35 kg/m² scheduled for elective posterior lumbar segmental instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia. All participants provide written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body mass index (BMI) \<35 kg/m²
  • Scheduled for elective posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Emergency surgery
  • Local infection or hematoma at the block application site
  • Previous surgery at the block application site
  • Presence of coagulopathy
  • Known allergy or toxicity to local anesthetics
  • History of hematological, renal, or hepatic disease, or advanced respiratory or cardiac failure
  • Chronic analgesic use, chronic alcohol consumption, or substance abuse
  • Inability to speak Turkish or presence of language/communication barriers
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • PCA + QIPB Group

    Patients who receive standard postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol in combination with ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) as part of routine clinical care following lumbar spinal surgery.

    Other: QIPB

  • PCA + LAI Group

    Patients who receive standard postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol alone without the addition of any regional analgesic block following lumbar spinal surgery. In addition, the surgeon will perform local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) of the incision site as part of the routine analgesia protocol.

    Other: LAI

Interventions

  • OtherQIPB

    Quadro-Iliac Plane Block using local anesthetic.

  • OtherLAI

    The surgeon will perform local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) of the incision site.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Opioid Consumption

    Total amount of tramadol consumption administered via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia during the first 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery

  2. Requirement for Rescue Analgesia

    Need for additional rescue analgesic medication during the first 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery

  3. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery

  4. Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was assessed at 24 hours after surgery using a 5-point Likert Satisfaction Scale (range: 1-5), where 1 = "not satisfied at all," 2 = "not satisfied," 3 = "neutral," 4 = "satisfied," and 5 = "very satisfied," with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, as data sharing was not planned at the time of study design and is not included in the ethical approval.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07326774
Lead sponsor
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Elif Acar Değer (Dr, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 23, 2026

Study contacts

Elif Acar Deger, Dr.
Contact
drelifacardeger@gmail.com
+905069435510
Oznur Demiroluk, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion