An observational study in RCC, sponsored by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-08.
Sponsored by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · Observational
TKI monotherapy or TKI/IO combination therapy is the standard first-line treatment for low- and intermediate-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In clinical practice, after the failure of first-line therapy, sequential treatment is often selected based on the initial regimen, with options including TKI/IO therapy or TKI therapy. In the real-world setting of low- and intermediate-risk advanced RCC in China, which sequential treatment strategy-TKI/IO-TKI or TKI-TKI/IO-provides greater survival benefits for patients? This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TKI/IO-TKI sequential therapy versus TKI-TKI/IO sequential therapy in real-world low- and intermediate-risk mRCC patients. The objective is to accurately identify the optimal patient subgroups for each treatment strategy, optimize treatment plans, improve patient quality of life, reduce healthcare costs, provide guidance and reference for the clinical management of low- and intermediate-risk mRCC patients, and contribute to the refinement and updating of related Chinese treatment guidelines.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital is the lead sponsor of 484 studies on the registry; 286 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Renal cell carcinoma
Exclusion Criteria:
PFS2
defined as the time from the initiation of first-line treatment to disease progression on second-line therapy or death from any cause in a real-world setting
Time frame: 1year
1L-rwPFS
Evaluate the real-world progression-free survival of first-line therapy (1L-rwPFS) for both cohorts
Time frame: 1year
2L-rwPFS
Evaluate the real-world progression-free survival of second-line therapy (2L-rwPFS) for both cohorts
Time frame: 1year
OS
the overall survival
Time frame: 1year
ORR
Assess the objective response rate (ORR) of primary and metastatic lesions based on RECIST 1.1 criteria for both cohorts
Time frame: 1year
saftey
Evaluate the safety profiles of the treatments in both cohorts
Time frame: 1year
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital