ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07319806Updated Jan 6, 2026

The Effect of Two Different Interventions on Emotional State, Pain, and Fear During Respiratory Panel Removal in Children: A Randomized Controlled Study

An interventional study of Palm Stimulator and Stress Ball in Procedural Pain, Fear Anxiety and Children, sponsored by Sakarya University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-06.

Sponsored by Sakarya University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2025, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Respiratory panel collection is a commonly used diagnostic procedure in children with suspected respiratory tract infections; however, it is often perceived as painful and distressing. Inadequately managed pain and fear during such procedures may negatively affect children's emotional responses to future medical interventions.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate and compare the effects of two non-pharmacological interventions-a palm stimulator and a stress ball-on pain, fear, and emotional behavior in children aged 6-12 years undergoing respiratory panel specimen collection. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: palm stimulator intervention, stress ball intervention, or routine care (control group).

Pain, fear, and emotional responses will be assessed using validated pediatric measurement tools before, during, and after the procedure. The findings of this study are expected to contribute evidence on simple, practical, and developmentally appropriate non-pharmacological strategies that can be safely integrated into pediatric nursing practice to improve children's procedural experiences.

Read the detailed description

Procedural pain and fear are common challenges in pediatric clinical settings, particularly during invasive diagnostic procedures such as respiratory panel specimen collection. Children's negative emotional and behavioral responses during such procedures may lead to heightened distress, increased procedural resistance, and long-term fear of medical interventions. Therefore, the implementation of effective, safe, and developmentally appropriate non-pharmacological interventions is a priority in pediatric care.

This randomized controlled trial is designed to examine the comparative effectiveness of two tactile-based non-pharmacological interventions-a palm stimulator and a stress ball-on pain intensity, fear levels, and emotional behavior in children aged 6 to 12 years undergoing respiratory panel collection. The study adopts a parallel-group design with three arms: palm stimulator intervention, stress ball intervention, and routine care as the control condition.

Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to one of the three groups using a computer-generated randomization process. All respiratory panel specimen collections will be performed by the same trained pediatric nurse to minimize procedural variability. The interventions will be applied only during the specimen collection procedure, without altering standard clinical practice.

Pain, fear, and emotional responses will be assessed using validated pediatric measurement tools. Emotional behavior will be evaluated through structured behavioral observation before and after the procedure, while pain and fear will be assessed shortly after completion of the specimen collection. Assessments will be conducted by healthcare professionals who are not involved in the intervention delivery to reduce assessment bias.

By comparing two simple, low-cost, and easily applicable interventions with routine care, this study aims to generate evidence that can inform pediatric nursing practice and support the integration of non-pharmacological pain and fear management strategies into routine clinical procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Procedural Pain
  • Fear Anxiety
  • Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Procedural Pain
  • Fear and Anxiety in Children
  • Palm Stimulator
  • Stress Ball
  • Emotional Behavior
  • Distraction Techniques
  • Pediatric Nursing
03

In context

Pain, Procedural

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 35 is below the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

Sakarya University is the lead sponsor of 190 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6 to 12 years
  • Hospitalized children scheduled for respiratory panel specimen collection
  • Ability to communicate verbally, understand instructions, and follow commands
  • Children not receiving sedative, anticonvulsant, or analgesic medications at the time of the procedure
  • Written obtained from a parent or legal guardian
  • Assent obtained from the child
  • Willingness of the child and parent/legal guardian to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who do not consent or assent to participate
  • Children requiring more than one attempt for respiratory panel specimen collection
  • Presence of chronic, acute, or life-threatening medical conditions
  • Children with cognitive or communication impairments that prevent reliable assessment
  • Children with dependence on electronic or technological devices that may interfere with the intervention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
35 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Palm Stimulator Intervention

    Participants in this arm will hold a palm stimulator device in their hand during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure. The device provides tactile stimulation through surface protrusions designed to activate sensory input. The palm stimulator will be used only during the procedure and removed immediately after completion.

    Behavioral: Palm Stimulator

  • Experimental
    Stress Ball Intervention

    Participants in this arm will be provided with a stress ball during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure. Children will be instructed to squeeze and release the stress ball repeatedly throughout the procedure as a distraction technique. The stress ball will be used only during the procedure.

    Behavioral: Stress Ball

  • No intervention
    Routine Care Control Group

    Participants in this arm will receive routine care during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure without the use of any additional non-pharmacological intervention. Standard clinical practices, including caregiver presence and verbal reassurance, will be applied.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPalm Stimulator

    Children will be instructed to hold the palm stimulator in the palm of their hand during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure and to squeeze/grip it throughout the procedure as a tactile distraction strategy. The palm stimulator will be used only during the procedure and removed immediately after completion.

  • BehavioralStress Ball

    Children will be given a stress ball during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure and will be instructed to repeatedly squeeze and release the ball throughout the procedure as an active distraction technique (e.g., counting while squeezing). The stress ball will be used only during the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity During Respiratory Panel Collection

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Children will rate the maximum level of pain experienced during the respiratory panel specimen collection procedure shortly after completion of the procedure. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after completion of the respiratory panel specimen collection

  2. Fear Level During Respiratory Panel Collection

    Fear level will be measured using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS). Children will self-report their level of fear related to the respiratory panel specimen collection immediately after the procedure. Higher scores reflect greater fear.

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after completion of the respiratory panel specimen collection

  3. Emotional Behavioral Response During Respiratory Panel Collection

    Emotional behavioral responses will be evaluated using the Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale. Behavioral observations will be conducted by a blinded outcome assessor before and after the respiratory panel specimen collection. Higher total scores indicate more negative emotional and behavioral responses.

    Time frame: From 2-3 minutes before the procedure to 2-3 minutes after completion of the respiratory panel specimen collection

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 7 months after the start.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 7 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 20, 2025
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
StartActual
May 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07319806
Lead sponsor
Sakarya University
Responsible party
Özge Karakaya Suzan (Asistant Doctor, Sakarya University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
Start date
May 15, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion