ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07319312Updated Jan 6, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Nurse-Led Stroke Transitional Care in Tanzania

An observational study in Stroke Acute and Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack, sponsored by Shandong University. Recruiting at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-06.

Sponsored by Shandong University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess the effects of nurse-led stroke transitional care in stroke survivors, caregivers and healthcare providers who participate in nurse-led stroke transitional care program to improve discharge preparedness, disease self-management and quality of life among stroke survivors. The main question it aims to answer is: does nurse-led stroke transitional care program improve discharge preparedness, disease self-management and quality of life among stroke survivors? Participants are currently participating in nurse-led stroke transitional care program as part of their medical care. Stroke survivors and their caregivers will be followed for six months period to assess their transitional care quality and clinical outcome measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke Acute
  • Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is below the median of 152 across 1,968 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 292 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will include nurses, doctors, stroke survivors and caregivers who are directly involved in hospital-to-home transition.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical nurses and physicians with six months of working experience in stroke care
  • Clinical nurses and physicians with a minimum of diploma in their professions.
  • Stroke survivors with 18 years old and above
  • Stroke survivors admitted in the stroke units
  • Stroke survivors with primary diagnosis of stroke confirmed by brain CT/MRI
  • Stroke survivors who undergo usual discharge process
  • Stroke survivors who live with their family caregivers
  • Stroke survivors who have mobile phones
  • Stroke survivors who can read and write
  • Stroke survivors who are able to communicate
  • Stroke survivors with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) \< 6
  • Stroke survivors with Modified Barthel Index (MBI) > 9
  • Stroke survivors with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) \< 5
  • Stroke survivors with Test (MoCA) > 14
  • Stroke survivors who are expected to stay in the ward for 3-5 days,
  • Stroke survivors who are expected to survive for 3 months
  • Family caregivers with mobile phones
  • Family caregivers who can read and write
  • Family caregivers who are able to communicate
  • Family caregivers who live with the patient after stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Healthcare providers who will be on leave during the study period.
  • Stroke survivors with previous stroke who are not admitted in stroke units
  • Stroke survivors who are discharged against medical advice
  • Stroke survivors who have end-stage organ failure
  • Stroke survivors who have family caregivers
  • Stroke survivors who can't read/write
  • Stroke survivors who have no mobile phones.
  • Family caregivers without mobile phone that is accessible
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Historical control group

    Stroke survivors and their caregivers received usual care

    Behavioral: Nurse-led stroke transitional care program

Interventions

  • BehavioralNurse-led stroke transitional care program

    Participants in intervention group will receive usual care plus nurse-led stroke transitional care. Two nurse champions will conduct the face-to-face sessions while other two nurse researchers will conduct the telephone call sessions between August and December, 2025. During hospitalization, the two nurse champions will conduct five face-to-face sessions (2 individual sessions at admission; and at discharge), and three group sessions with 2-4 dyads of patients and caregivers. After hospitalization, two nurse researchers will conduct seven follow-up sessions for three months via phone calls at day 3, week 1, week 3, week 5, week 7, week 9, and week 11. The face-to-face sessions and phone call sessions will take 40-60 minutes and 20-30 minutes respectively

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-efficacy among stroke survivors

    Ability to take control and perform recommended health behaviors and discharge instructions. Self-efficacy will be measured by the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (a=0.9) developed by Jones and colleagues. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate better ability to follow and adhere to healthy lifestyles after stroke

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  2. Quality of life among stroke survivors

    Quality of life that will be measured by the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SSQoL) with (a=0.85). This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate better quality of life as evidenced by ability to perform self-care activities, improved cognitive function, mobility, and engaging in social activities

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  3. Discharge preparedness among survivors

    Discharge preparedness that will be measured by the Short Forms of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) developed by Weiss. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate readiness for hospital-to-home discharge among stroke survivors.

    Time frame: within 1 month after discharge

  4. Discharge preparedness among health care providers

    Discharge preparedness that will be measured by the Short Forms of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) developed by Weiss. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate agreement on readiness for hospital-to-home discharge among nurses and doctors.

    Time frame: within 1 month after discharge

  5. Resilience among caregivers

    Resilience will be measured by the 10-items Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) validated by Laura with a=0.85). This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate better ability and readiness to take care giving responsibilities.

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  6. Quality of transition care among survivors and caregivers

    Quality of TC will be measured by the Care Transitions Measure (CTM) Tool developed by Eric Coleman. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate better perceived quality of transition care.

    Time frame: within 1 month after discharge

  7. Caregiver self-efficacy

    Caregiver self-efficacy will be measured by the 10-items Family Caregiver Activation Tool (FCAT) developed by Coleman with a=0.6. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate better ability to assist the stroke survivors to follow and adhere to healthy lifestyles and clinic appointment after stroke

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression and anxiety among survivors and caregivers

    Depression and anxiety that will be measured by the locally validated 10-items Kessler Psychological Distress Scale with a=0.85. This will be measured by a scale as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate poor mental health status after discharge.

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  2. Care satisfaction among survivors and caregivers

    Satisfaction of hospital care will be measured by a questionnaire developed specific for this study. It will be measured as total scores and mean scores. High total and mean scores indicate good satisfaction with transitional care.

    Time frame: within 1 month after discharge

  3. Mortality among survivors

    This will be counted as a death event after discharge.

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  4. readmission among survivors

    This will be measured as number of times the patient is readmitted at the hospital after discharge. High frequency will indicate many readmissions.

    Time frame: 6 months after discharge

  5. length of hospital stay among survivors

    This will be measured as number of days spent in the hospital before discharge. This will be calculated as number of days spent at the hospital from admission to discharge. High number above 5 indicates long hospital stay.

    Time frame: Day 1 after discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — I will consider sharing it upon finishing enrollment of participants

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 835 non-industry observational studies under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 897 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 85.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
StartActual
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 25, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 30, 2026
Last update
Jan 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07319312
Responsible party
Nyagwaswa Athanas Michael (Principal Investigator, Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 6, 2026

Study contacts

Nyagwaswa Michael, Masters
Contact
nyagwaswamichael04@gmail.com
+255685005923

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion