CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07313839BI-SUREUpdated Jun 17, 2026

Comparison of Self-Locking Versus Traditional Sutures in Double-Layer Laparoscopic Vaginal Vault Closure After Hysterectomy (BI-SURE Trial)

An interventional study of Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Self-Locking Suture and Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Polyglactin 910 in Gynecologic Cancers, Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma. Recruiting at 5 sites in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-17.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Vaginal vault closure after laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy may be associated with postoperative complications such as vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, and bleeding. The optimal suture material and technique for laparoscopic colporrhaphy, particularly in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies, remain controversial.

The BI-SURE trial is a multicenter, randomized controlled study designed to compare double-layer self-locking sutures versus double-layer traditional Polyglactin 910 sutures for laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy. The study aims to evaluate postoperative effectiveness and safety within three months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy represent standard surgical approaches for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies but are associated with a higher risk of vaginal vault complications compared with open or vaginal surgery. Although uncommon, postoperative complications such as vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, and bleeding may lead to significant morbidity and require additional medical or surgical interventions.

Vaginal vault closure can be performed using different suturing techniques and materials. Traditional braided sutures, such as Polyglactin 910, are widely used in clinical practice, while self-locking (barbed) sutures have been introduced to facilitate laparoscopic suturing by maintaining tissue approximation without the need for knots. Evidence comparing these sutures is limited, particularly for double-layer closure techniques and in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies.

The BI-SURE trial is a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial designed to compare double-layer self-locking sutures versus double-layer traditional Polyglactin 910 sutures for laparoscopic vaginal vault closure following hysterectomy for malignant gynecologic disease. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Postoperative outcomes will be assessed up to three months after surgery, including vaginal cuff-related complications and postoperative pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Vaginal vault closure
  • Colporrhaphy
  • Self-locking suture
  • Barbed suture
  • Polyglactin 910
  • Gynecologic oncology
  • Postoperative complications
  • Randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,233 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 292 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 310 is above the median of 119 across 689 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotically assisted hysterectomy for gynecologic malignant disease
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Laparotomic or vaginal hysterectomy
  • Contraindication to laparoscopic vaginal vault closure
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Self-Locking Suture Group

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy using a double-layer continuous suturing technique performed with a self-locking (barbed) suture, according to current clinical practice.

    Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Self-Locking Suture

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Suture Group

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy using a double-layer continuous suturing technique performed with traditional braided Polyglactin 910 suture, according to current clinical practice.

    Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Polyglactin 910

Interventions

  • ProcedureDouble-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Self-Locking Suture

    Laparoscopic vaginal vault closure performed using a double-layer continuous suturing technique with a self-locking (barbed) suture following hysterectomy.

  • ProcedureDouble-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Polyglactin 910

    Laparoscopic vaginal vault closure performed using a double-layer continuous suturing technique with traditional braided Polyglactin 910 suture following hysterectomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vaginal cuff dehiscence rate

    Proportion of participants experiencing vaginal cuff dehiscence requiring surgical reintervention after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

    Time frame: Within 3 months after surgery

  2. Vaginal cuff infection rate

    Proportion of participants developing vaginal cuff infection, defined as abnormal vaginal discharge with or without fever, leukocytosis, and/or local tenderness, requiring antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: Within 3 months after surgery

  3. Postoperative bleeding rate

    Proportion of participants experiencing postoperative vaginal cuff bleeding requiring hemostatic treatment.

    Time frame: Within 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    Postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: At 1 month and 3 months after surgery

  2. Early postoperative composite complication rate

    Proportion of participants experiencing vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, or bleeding before the initiation of adjuvant therapy.

    Time frame: Within 1 month after surgery

07

Study locations

2 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma
    Parma, Italy 43125, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
    Bologna, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
    Cuneo, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Department of Gynecologic Oncology. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
    Milan, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
  • Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
    Udine, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is conducted within a hospital-based academic setting and no data repository has been designated for public data release. Data will be stored securely at the sponsor institution and will be accessible only to authorized study personnel in compliance with applicable privacy regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07313839
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Responsible party
Vito Andrea Capozzi (Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 7, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2026

Study contacts

Vito Andrea Capozzi
Contact
vcapozzi@ao.pr.it
0521704819

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion