CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07308756Updated Apr 13, 2026

Impact of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine and Esketamine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Esketamine in General Anesthesia, Surgery and Dexmedetomidine, sponsored by Peking University First Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Peking University First Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
316
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients after surgery, quality of recovery has significant impacts on the prognosis, quality of life, and rational allocation of medical resources. Dexmedetomidine and esketamine have each been used during the perioperative period and improved postoperative analgesia and subjective sleep quality. This 2x2 factorial trial is designed to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine, esketamine, and their combination on the quality of recovery in patients recovering from surgery under general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Surgical operation is an important therapeutic modality for surgical patients; quality of postoperative recovery has significant impacts on the prognosis, quality of life, and rational allocation of medical resources. Postoperative recovery is a complex process involving return of patients from surgery to baseline physiological and psychological status. Traditional indicators evaluating postoperative recovery mainly focus on physiological markers, length of hospital stay (LOS), and incidences of adverse events and complications. Recently, the quality of recovery (QoR) is increasingly used. QoR is subjectively reported by patients and includes multidimensional assessments on postoperative pain, cognitive function, sleep quality, and emotional stability.

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, has anxiolytic, sedative, and analgesic effects. By activing α2-adrenergic receptors in the locus coeruleus, it activates the endogenous sleep pathways, and produce a state mimicking non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Clinical studies showed that perioperative use of low-dose dexmedetomidine improves sleep architecture, increases sleep efficiency, and prolongs total sleep time in non-mechanically ventilated patients. Furthermore, when used as an analgesic adjuvant, dexmedetomidine improves analgesia, reduces opioid consumption, and reduces opioid-related adverse events.

Ketamine, a non-competitive N-Methyl-D-aspartic (NMDA) receptor antagonist, exerts analgesic and anti-hyperalgesic effects by reducing transmission of noxious stimuli to the spinal cord. It is characterized by minimal respiratory and circulatory depression and excellent analgesic efficacy. In recent years, multiple studies confirmed that ketamine has antidepressant properties. Ketamine is a racemic mixture composed of S-ketamine (esketamine) and R-ketamine. Esketamine exhibits a stronger affinity for the NMDA receptor, with an effect approximately twice that of racemic ketamine. In clinical practice, esketamine has stronger analgesic effects and a lower incidence of adverse psychomimetic reactions. When used in combination with opioids, esketamine improved postoperative analgesia.

Previous studies showed that combined use of dexmedetomidine and esketamine might produce synergetic effects in improving sedation and analgesia. A recent trial found that low-dose dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination improved pain relief and subjective sleep quality in patients after scoliosis corrective surgery, without increasing side effects. It is therefore hypothesized that co-administration of dexmedetomidine and esketamine may enhance efficacy and optimize the quality of postoperative recovery. This 2x2 factorial trial is designed to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine, esketamine, and their combination on the quality of recovery in patients recovering from surgery under general anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • General Anesthesia
  • Surgery
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Esketamine
  • Quality of Recovery

Keywords

  • General anesthesia
  • Surgery
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Esketamine
  • Quality of recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Peking University First Hospital is the lead sponsor of 378 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or over;
  • Scheduled to undergo surgery under general anesthesia, with an expected surgical duration of at least 1 hour;
  • Required patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to communicate preoperatively due to visual, auditory, or verbal barriers or other reasons;
  • Severe bradycardia (heart rate \<50 bpm), sick sinus syndrome, or grade 2 or higher atrioventricular block without pacemaker;
  • History of hyperthyroidism or pheochromocytoma;
  • History of schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, myasthenia gravis, or intracranial hypertension;
  • Intracranial tumor or neurosurgery;
  • Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C), renal failure (requiring renal replacement therapy), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV or higher;
  • Enrolled in other clinical studies.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
316 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine

    A loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.2 ug/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidineat a rate of 0.2 ug/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with dexmedetomidine 100 ug and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Experimental
    Esketamine

    A loading dose of esketamine (0.1 mg/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of esketamineat a rate of 0.1 mg/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with esketamine 50 mg and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

    Drug: Esketamine

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine-esketamine

    A loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.2 ug/kg) and esketamine (0.1 mg/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.2 ug/kg/h and esketamine at a rate of 0.1 mg/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with dexmedetomidine 100 ug, esketamine 50 mg, and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine-esketamine

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    A loading dose of placebo (normal saline) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of placebo at a rate same as above until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    A loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.2 ug/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidineat a rate of 0.2 ug/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with dexmedetomidine 100 ug and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

  • DrugEsketamine

    A loading dose of esketamine (0.1 mg/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of esketamineat a rate of 0.1 mg/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with esketamine 50 mg and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

  • DrugDexmedetomidine-esketamine

    A loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.2 ug/kg) and esketamine (0.1 mg/kg) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.2 ug/kg/h and esketamine at a rate of 0.1 mg/kg/h until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with dexmedetomidine 100 ug, esketamine 50 mg, and sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

  • DrugPlacebo

    A loading dose of placebo (normal saline) is administered after anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of placebo at a rate same as above until 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Self-controlled analgesia is established with sufentanil 100 ug, diluated with normal saline to 100 ml, and programmed to deliver 2-ml boluses with a lock-out interval of 10 minutes and a background infusion rate at 1 ml/h for a duration of 48 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score

    A 15-item scale that evaluate quality of recovery in five dimensions: pain, physiological comfort, physiological independence, psychological support, and emotional state. Scores range from 0 to 150 , with higher scores indicating better recovery quality.

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score

    QoR is a 15-item scale that evaluate quality of recovery in five dimensions: pain, physiological comfort, physiological independence, psychological support, and emotional state. Scores range from 0 to 150 , with higher scores indicating better recovery quality.

    Time frame: At 72 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative delirium (POD) within 4 days

    Delirium will be assessed twice daily (8:00-10:00 and 18:00-20:00) using the 3-minute diagnostic interview for confusion assessment method-defined delirium (3D-CAM) or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU).

    Time frame: Up to 4 days after surgery

  3. Incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery at 5 days

    Cognitive function will be assessed with the telephone-administered Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) at baseline and at 5 days or before hospital discharge after surgery. A decline of T-MoCA score of 1 standard deviation (SD) or more from baseline is defined as delayed neurocognitive recovery.

    Time frame: Up to 5 days after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Area under curve of pain intensity after surgery

    Pain intensity will be assessed at 1 hour and then twice daily (8:00-10:00 and 18:00-20:00) after surgery using the numeric rating scale (an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain).

    Time frame: Up to 4 days after surgery

  2. Cumulative subjective sleep quality score after surgery

    Subjective sleep quality will be assessed once daily (8:00-10:00) after surgery using the numeric rating scale (an 11-point scale where 0=the best sleep and 10=the worst sleep).

    Time frame: Up to 4 days after surgery

  3. Length of hospital stay after surgery

    Length of hospital stay after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  4. Incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days

    Postoperative complications are generally defined as new-onset medical conditions that are deemed harmful and required therapeutic intervention, i.e., grade 2 or higher on the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  5. All-cause 30-day mortality

    All-cause 30-day mortality

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  6. Incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery at 30 days

    Cognitive function will be assessed with the telephone-administered Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) at baseline and at 30 days after surgery. A decline of T-MoCA score of 1 standard deviation (SD) or more from baseline is defined as delayed neurocognitive recovery.

    Time frame: At 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Peking University First Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100034, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhang Y, Cui F, Ma JH, Wang DX. Mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination to supplement analgesia for patients after scoliosis correction surgery: a double-blind randomised trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;131(2):385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 9. PubMed 37302963 ↗
  • Guo J, Qiu D, Gu HW, Wang XM, Hashimoto K, Zhang GF, Yang JJ. Efficacy and safety of perioperative application of ketamine on postoperative depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;28(6):2266-2276. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-01945-z. Epub 2023 Jan 20. PubMed 36670198 ↗
  • Xie M, Liang Y, Deng Y, Li T. Effect of S-ketamine on Postoperative Pain in Adults Post-Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2023 Jul;26(4):327-335. PubMed 37535771 ↗
  • Wang S, Deng CM, Zeng Y, Chen XZ, Li AY, Feng SW, Xu LL, Chen L, Yuan HM, Hu H, Yang T, Han T, Zhang HY, Jiang M, Sun XY, Guo HN, Sessler DI, Wang DX. Efficacy of a single low dose of esketamine after childbirth for mothers with symptoms of prenatal depression: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2024 Apr 10;385:e078218. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078218. PubMed 38808490 ↗
  • Persson J, Hasselstrom J, Maurset A, Oye I, Svensson JO, Almqvist O, Scheinin H, Gustafsson LL, Almqvist O. Pharmacokinetics and non-analgesic effects of S- and R-ketamines in healthy volunteers with normal and reduced metabolic capacity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;57(12):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s002280100353. PubMed 11936706 ↗
  • Segmiller F, Ruther T, Linhardt A, Padberg F, Berger M, Pogarell O, Moller HJ, Kohler C, Schule C. Repeated S-ketamine infusions in therapy resistant depression: a case series. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;53(9):996-8. doi: 10.1002/jcph.122. Epub 2013 Jul 24. No abstract available. PubMed 23893490 ↗
  • Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Alphs L, Lane R, Lim P, Pinter C, Hough D, Sanacora G, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Jan;17(1):55-65. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.17105. Epub 2019 Jan 7. PubMed 32015715 ↗
  • Molero P, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Martin-Santos R, Calvo-Sanchez E, Gutierrez-Rojas L, Meana JJ. Antidepressant Efficacy and Tolerability of Ketamine and Esketamine: A Critical Review. CNS Drugs. 2018 May;32(5):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0519-3. PubMed 29736744 ↗
  • Bartova L, Papageorgiou K, Milenkovic I, Dold M, Weidenauer A, Willeit M, Winkler D, Kasper S. Rapid antidepressant effect of S-ketamine in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;28(8):980-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jul 2. PubMed 30041987 ↗
  • Smith-Apeldoorn SY, Veraart JK, Spijker J, Kamphuis J, Schoevers RA. Maintenance ketamine treatment for depression: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;9(11):907-921. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00317-0. PubMed 36244360 ↗
  • Ma S, Chen M, Jiang Y, Xiang X, Wang S, Wu Z, Li S, Cui Y, Wang J, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Ma H, Duan S, Li H, Yang Y, Lingle CJ, Hu H. Sustained antidepressant effect of ketamine through NMDAR trapping in the LHb. Nature. 2023 Oct;622(7984):802-809. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06624-1. Epub 2023 Oct 18. PubMed 37853123 ↗
  • Brinck EC, Tiippana E, Heesen M, Bell RF, Straube S, Moore RA, Kontinen V. Perioperative intravenous ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 20;12(12):CD012033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012033.pub4. PubMed 30570761 ↗
  • Schnabel A, Meyer-Friessem CH, Reichl SU, Zahn PK, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Is intraoperative dexmedetomidine a new option for postoperative pain treatment? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2013 Jul;154(7):1140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.029. Epub 2013 Mar 27. PubMed 23706726 ↗
  • Wu XH, Cui F, Zhang C, Meng ZT, Wang DX, Ma J, Wang GF, Zhu SN, Ma D. Low-dose Dexmedetomidine Improves Sleep Quality Pattern in Elderly Patients after Noncardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2016 Nov;125(5):979-991. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001325. PubMed 27571256 ↗
  • Lu W, Fu Q, Luo X, Fu S, Hu K. Effects of dexmedetomidine on sleep quality of patients after surgery without mechanical ventilation in ICU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(23):e7081. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007081. PubMed 28591048 ↗
  • Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, Sarkela M, Saastamoinen A, Snapir A, Scheinin H, Scheinin M, Merilainen P, Himanen SL, Jaaskelainen S. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Feb;52(2):289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01537.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14. PubMed 18005372 ↗
  • Tasbihgou SR, Barends CRM, Absalom AR. The role of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jul;35(2):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 14. PubMed 34030806 ↗
  • Mo Y, Zimmermann AE. Role of dexmedetomidine for the prevention and treatment of delirium in intensive care unit patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;47(6):869-76. doi: 10.1345/aph.1AR708. PubMed 23719785 ↗
  • Xu M, Zhang G, Tang Y, Wang R, Yang J. Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Subjective Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Sep;37(9):1744-1750. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 5. PubMed 37301699 ↗
  • Joe YE, Kang CM, Lee HM, Kim KJ, Hwang HK, Lee JR. Quality of Recovery of Patients Who Underwent Curative Pancreatectomy: Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia Using the QOR-40 Questionnaire. World J Surg. 2021 Aug;45(8):2581-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06117-0. Epub 2021 Apr 21. PubMed 33881579 ↗
  • Hung KC, Ko CC, Hsu CW, Pang YL, Chen JY, Sun CK. Association of peripheral nerve blocks with patient-reported quality of recovery in female patients receiving breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;69(10):1288-1299. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02295-0. Epub 2022 Jul 26. PubMed 35882724 ↗
  • Hung KC, Chu CC, Hsing CH, Chang YP, Li YY, Liu WC, Chen IW, Chen JY, Sun CK. Association between perioperative intravenous lidocaine and subjective quality of recovery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110521. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110521. Epub 2021 Sep 20. PubMed 34547603 ↗
  • Nilsson U, Gruen R, Myles PS. Postoperative recovery: the importance of the team. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e158-e164. doi: 10.1111/anae.14869. PubMed 31903575 ↗
  • Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PubMed 35033845 ↗
  • Shulman MA, Myles PS, Chan MT, McIlroy DR, Wallace S, Ponsford J. Measurement of disability-free survival after surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Mar;122(3):524-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000586. PubMed 25689757 ↗
  • Tahiri M, Sikder T, Maimon G, Teasdale D, Hamadani F, Sourial N, Feldman LS, Guralnick J, Fraser SA, Demyttenaere S, Bergman S. The impact of postoperative complications on the recovery of elderly surgical patients. Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1762-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4440-2. Epub 2015 Jul 21. PubMed 26194260 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07308756
Lead sponsor
Peking University First Hospital
Responsible party
Dong-Xin Wang (Professor and Chairman, Department of Anaesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Contact
wangdongxin@hotmail.com
8610 83572784
Kun Wang, MD
Contact
wk2021@bjmu.edu.cn
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Peking University First Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion