An interventional study of EEG recording and Picture recognition test in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Institut Pasteur. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-24.
Sponsored by Institut Pasteur · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a rhythmic auditory training program in improving language skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) who have a language acquisition disorder. The program focuses on training children to reproduce the syllable rhythms of speech, and the study will evaluate the children's language skills before and after participating in the program.
1,724 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 500 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 52 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →Institut Pasteur is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
First baseline of 4 weeks and a second baseline of 8 weeks
Behavioral: EEG recording · Behavioral: Picture recognition test
First baseline of 6 weeks and a second baseline of 6 weeks
Behavioral: EEG recording · Behavioral: Picture recognition test
First baseline of 8 weeks and a second baseline of 4 weeks
Behavioral: EEG recording · Behavioral: Picture recognition test
EEG recording while listening to natural sounds
Children will have 4 images in front of them and a sound recording will be played to tell them which image to choose. They will have to click on the one that corresponds to what was said in the sound recording.
The difference in the progression of language acquisition measured by the difference in the number of images recognised in image recognition tests.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of Neural tracking of speech via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity before and after a session of listening to rhythmic sound.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of theta/gamma frequency bands via EEG measurements of cerebral oscillatory activity before and after rhythmic auditory training
Time frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of Phase Locking Value via EEG measurements of cerebral oscillatory activity before and after rhythmic auditory training
Time frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of theta/gamma Phase-amplitude Coupling in auditory cortical areas via EEG measurements of cerebral oscillatory activity before and after rhythmic auditory training
Time frame: 12 weeks
correlation between Neural tracking via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 12 weeks
correlation between Phase Locking Value via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 12 weeks
correlation between theta/gamma phase-amplitude coupling via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 12 weeks
correlation between theta/gamma power via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 12 weeks
correlation between Neural tracking via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index
Time frame: 24 weeks
correlation between theta/gamma power via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 24 weeks
correlation between theta/gamma phase-amplitude coupling via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 24 weeks
correlation between Phase Locking Value via EEG measurements of brain oscillatory activity during training and the language progression index.
Time frame: 24 weeks
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.