ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07296237DACG VIUpdated Dec 22, 2025

Beyond Survival: Addressing Gynecological and Sexual Health in Women After Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer

An observational study in Anal Cancer, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in Denmark. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-22.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn how radiotherapy for anal cancer affects the vaginal and sexual health of women after treatment. The study will also look at whether the radiation dose to the vagina is linked to the level of vaginal problems.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • How many women develop moderate or severe narrowing of the vagina after radiotherapy?
  • Is there a link between the radiation dose and vaginal problems?
  • How do vaginal changes affect sexual health and daily life?
  • What care and support do women receive, and how satisfied are they with this support?

Participants are women aged 18 years or older who were treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for anal cancer and are 6 to 36 months after treatment.

Participants will:

Have a gynaecological examination to check the vagina for changes such as narrowing, stiffness, bleeding, or scarring Complete online questionnaires about quality of life and sexual health Answer questions about use of vaginal dilators, hormone treatment, and sexual counselling Allow researchers to analyse their radiotherapy scans to measure how much radiation the vagina received Some participants will also take part in a telephone interview about their experience with guidance and support after treatment

The study will include about 80 participants across three Danish hospitals. About 20 participants will take part in the interview part of the study.

The results from this study may help improve how doctors and nurses prevent, detect, and treat vaginal and sexual problems after radiotherapy for anal cancer. This may lead to better support and quality of life for future patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anal Cancer

Keywords

  • anal cancer
  • Radiotherapy
  • Sexual dysfunction
  • Female sexual health
  • Gynecological side effects
  • Patient-reported outcomes
03

In context

Anus Neoplasms

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Anus Neoplasms; 74 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 144 across 75 observational studies indexed under Anus Neoplasms.

Browse Anus Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes adult women who have been treated with chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer in Denmark. Participants are recruited during routine follow-up visits at three oncology departments. All participants are between 6 and 36 months after treatment and are in cancer follow-up care

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with anal cancer
  • Treated with chemoradiotherapy with curative intent
  • Between 6 and 36 months since completion of radiotherapy
  • Able and willing to give written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy for another disease
  • Treated with electron beam radiotherapy
  • Unable to speak or understand Danish
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of moderate to severe vaginal stenosis after radiotherapy for anal cancer

    This outcome measures how many participants have moderate or severe narrowing of the vagina after treatment for anal cancer. Vaginal stenosis will be assessed during a gynaecological examination using a standard clinical grading system CTCAE v. 5.

    Time frame: Single assessment at study visit, 6 to 36 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gynecological findings at examination after radiotherapy for anal cancer

    This outcome measures physical changes in the vagina assessed during a standardised gynaecological examination. Findings include vaginal stiffness, scarring, fragile tissue with bleeding, small visible blood vessels, ulcers, and adhesions. All findings are recorded using a structured electronic clinical examination form based on established vaginal morbidity assessment methods.

    Time frame: Single assessment at study visit, 6 to 36 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy

  2. Patient-reported sexual health and quality of life after radiotherapy for anal cance

    Participants complete validated questionnaires covering sexual health and quality of life: * EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-ANL27 for general and anal cancer-specific quality of life * EORTC QLQ-SH22 for sexual health, including vaginal dryness, pain, and sexual satisfaction * Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain All questionnaires use fixed response scales and are scored according to official scoring manuals.

    Time frame: Single assessment at study visit, 6 to 36 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy

  3. Use of vaginal dilators, hormone treatment, and sexual counselling after radiotherapy

    This outcome measures how often participants use vaginal dilators, whether they use local or systemic hormone treatment, and whether they have received specialised sexual counselling after radiotherapy. Data are collected using a structured pattern-of-care questionnaire completed by participants.

    Time frame: Single questionnaire assessment at study visit, 6 to 36 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy

  4. Radiation dose to the vagina and its relation to vaginal stenosis

    This outcome measures the radiation dose received by the vagina during treatment and examines its relation to moderate or severe vaginal stenosis. The vagina is outlined retrospectively on radiotherapy planning scans, and dose-volume data are extracted from treatment plans. These dose data are analysed in relation to clinical findings of vaginal stenosis.

    Time frame: Retrospective analysis of radiotherapy plans after study inclusion

  5. Patient satisfaction with guidance on gynecological and sexual side effects

    This outcome measures how satisfied participants are with the information and support they received about vaginal and sexual side effects after radiotherapy. Data are collected through semi-structured telephone interviews, which explore timing, clarity, and usefulness of the guidance. Interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.

    Time frame: Single telephone interview within 3 months after study inclusion

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 9 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2025
First posted
Dec 22, 2025
StartActual
Nov 13, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Last update
Dec 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07296237
Collaborators
Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Department of Oncology Herlev Hospital, Denmark
Responsible party
Johanne Hollands Steffensen (MD., Aarhus University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2025
Start date
Nov 13, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 22, 2025

Study contacts

Johanne H. Steffensen, MD.
Contact
johste@oncology.au.dk
004551434830
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion