ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07292987RP-DIAGUpdated Feb 10, 2026

Implementation and Evaluation of a Post-Diagnostic Announcement Protocol at the CRMR RefeRet, Quinze-Vingts Hospital

An interventional study of Enhanced post-diagnostic support and Usual Care in Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), sponsored by Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study explores whether adding early nurse-led and psychological support after the diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) can improve patient experience and emotional well-being. RP is a rare, progressive eye disease often diagnosed after a long and difficult process, and receiving the diagnosis can be emotionally distressing.

Eighty newly diagnosed adults will be randomly assigned to either usual care or an enhanced pathway that includes early follow-up with a nurse, structured emotional monitoring, and a psychologist visit at six months.

The study aims to determine if this structured support improves patient satisfaction and reduces anxiety and depression compared with standard care.

Read the detailed description

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a rare genetic disease causing progressive vision loss. The announcement of diagnosis is a key moment that may trigger anxiety or depression, yet post-diagnostic care in ophthalmology often remains limited to medical information.

This prospective, monocentric, randomized study at the Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital tests a structured post-diagnostic support pathway that combines early nurse-led follow-up and systematic psychological support.

Eighty newly diagnosed patients aged 18-65 will be randomized into two parallel groups. The experimental group will receive early nurse consultations at 15 days and 6 months, psychological follow-up at 6 months, and repeated HADS assessments. The control group will receive usual care.

The primary outcome is patient satisfaction at 12 months (PREM). Secondary outcomes include changes in anxiety and depression (HADS) and feasibility feedback from nursing staff (RETEX).

Findings will inform the design of sustainable, multidisciplinary care models for rare eye diseases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Retinitis Pigmentosa

278 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinitis Pigmentosa; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 27 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Browse Retinitis Pigmentosa studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and followed at the Quinze-Vingts Rare Eye Disease Center, with diagnosis made after the project begins
  • Aged 18 to 65 years
  • Male or female
  • French-speaking
  • Have a phone number
  • Reside in France

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Participants enrolled in a therapeutic clinical trial within the past 12 months
  • Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Adults under legal protection or unable to provide
  • Individuals with other medical conditions or taking treatments that could interfere with study evaluations
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual care group

    Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Experimental
    Enhanced care group

    Behavioral: Enhanced post-diagnostic support

Interventions

  • BehavioralEnhanced post-diagnostic support

    Nurse-led and psychologist consultation

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Standard ophthalmologist consultation with optional psychologist consultation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction via PREM at 12 months

    Difference in patient satisfaction via PREM (Patient Reported Experience Measure) at 12 months between the two arms. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely worse than expected) to 5 (better than expected). Higher scores indicate a better perceived quality of care and psychological support.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychological impact after post-diagnostic support via HADS

    Evaluation of the psychological impact of the enhanced post-diagnostic care. Longitudinal assessment of emotional well-being in the experimental group will be performed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three key time points. Each subscale (anxiety and depression) ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 15 days, 6 months and 12 months after diagnosis

  2. Feasibility and staff experience of implementing enhanced post-diagnostic support via RETEX and observation log

    Nursing staff will complete a RETEX (Retour d'Expérience) questionnaire to assess the feasibility of the enhanced post-diagnostic care. The questionnaire evaluates challenges such as physician presence, adequacy of tools and setting, respect for patient privacy, communication with other staff, and consultation duration. The RETEX questionnaire consists of 11 dichotomous (Yes/No) items completed by nursing staff. Total score ranges from 0 to 11. Higher scores indicate greater perceived emotional and/or organizational burden, whereas lower scores indicate better feasibility and professional comfort.

    Time frame: 15 days, 6 months and 12 months after diagnosis

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier National D' Ophtalmologie Des Quinze-Vingts
    Paris, Île-de-France Region 75012, France
    Recruiting
    • DRCI · Contactrecherche@15-20.fr · + 33 0140 02 17 38
    • Isabelle Audo, Pr · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2028, 25 months after the start.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Retinitis Pigmentosa, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 154. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2025
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
StartActual
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 2028
Last update
Feb 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07292987
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2026

Study contacts

Isabelle AUDO, Pr
Contact
isabelle.audo@inserm.fr
+33 0140 02 14 30
Benoit Blanchard
Contact
bblanchard@15-20.fr
+33 0140021430
Isabelle Audo, Pr
principal investigator · CRMR Centre Hospitalier National D' Ophtalmologie Des Quinze-Vingts

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion