ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07286227LVFuncTeeUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Assement of Left Ventricular Function Before Decannulation in Cardiac Surgery :Visual Estimation vs TEE

An observational study in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery and Left Ventricular Dysfunction, sponsored by Ataturk University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Ataturk University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cardiovascular surgeon's visual estimation of LV function before decannulation following cardiopulmonary bypass, using TEE results as the reference standard.

Read the detailed description

The fundamental rationale for conducting this study is that the moment of decannulation after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) represents one of the most critical stages in cardiac surgery in terms of patient outcomes. At this stage, inadequate left ventricular (LV) function (dysfunction) can lead to severe hemodynamic deterioration, increased complications, and a higher risk of mortality. Therefore, accurately and rapidly assessing LV function just before separation from CPB is of vital importance. Although Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) is currently the most reliable and objective method, it requires specialized equipment, training, and time. On the other hand, experienced cardiac surgeons often make a visual estimation based on the observable physical appearance of the heart (such as its color, contractility, and fullness), relying on their many years of experience. This visual assessment is extremely fast and practical; however, it is subjective, and its reliability has not been clearly established scientifically.

Thus, the primary rationale for this study is to fill this gap in the scientific literature and determine how well the surgeon's quick, experience-based visual estimation aligns with the objective findings of TEE, the gold-standard method.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cardiovascular surgeon's visual estimation of LV function before decannulation following cardiopulmonary bypass, using TEE results as the reference standard. In other words, it aims to statistically determine the agreement between the surgeon's practical visual assessment and the objective measurements provided by TEE, thereby offering a scientific basis for clinical decision-making by revealing the sensitivity and specificity limits of the surgeon's estimation, particularly in detecting critical conditions such as severe dysfunction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery
  • Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Transesophageal Echocardiography
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
  • Visual Estimation
  • Eyeballing Method
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Ejection Fraction Assessment
  • Intraoperative Monitoring
  • Decannulation
  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass
03

In context

Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

260 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 198 across 103 observational studies indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction, Left.

Browse Ventricular Dysfunction, Left studies →

Lead sponsor

Ataturk University is the lead sponsor of 458 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass at a single tertiary university hospital. The study population consists of individuals receiving CABG, valve surgery, or aortic surgery who meet eligibility criteria and undergo routine intraoperative TEE monitoring. Participants represent a typical clinical population of moderate-to-high surgical risk (ASA III-IV).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG, valve surgery, or aortic surgery)
  • III-IV
  • Able and willing to provide written
  • Suitable for intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Known severe preoperative left ventricular dysfunction (EF \< 30%)
  • Significant arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation)
  • Preoperative requirement for mechanical circulatory support (e.g., IABP)
  • to TEE (esophageal pathology, bleeding risk, strictures)
  • Inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass Cohort

    Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG, valve surgery, or aortic procedures). During the decannulation phase, left ventricular function will be assessed visually by the cardiac surgeon (eyeballing method) and objectively by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). No additional intervention is performed. Both evaluations are part of standard intraoperative monitoring. Data will be recorded simultaneously to compare the accuracy and agreement between visual estimation and TEE-derived ejection fraction.

    Diagnostic Test: Intraoperative Left Ventricular Function Assessment

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testIntraoperative Left Ventricular Function Assessment

    Left ventricular function will be assessed during the decannulation phase of cardiopulmonary bypass using two diagnostic methods: (1) visual estimation of ventricular contractility by the cardiac surgeon (eyeballing) and (2) objective measurement using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). No experimental procedure, medication, or additional intervention will be applied. Both assessments are part of standard intraoperative monitoring in cardiac surgery. Data from both methods will be collected simultaneously to compare accuracy, agreement, and diagnostic performance.

    Also known as: Visual Estimation (Eyeballing), Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement Between Surgeon Visual Estimation and TEE-Derived Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    This outcome evaluates the level of agreement between the cardiac surgeon's visual estimation (eyeballing) of left ventricular systolic function and the ejection fraction measured by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Agreement will be quantified using statistical measures such as Cohen's kappa coefficient and correlation coefficients. Visual estimation categories (e.g., normal, moderately reduced, severely reduced) will be compared with corresponding TEE-derived EF classifications.

    Time frame: During the decannulation phase of cardiopulmonary bypass (intraoperative period)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Surgeon Visual Estimation for Detecting Reduced Left Ventricular Function

    This outcome measures the diagnostic performance of the surgeon's visual estimation in identifying reduced left ventricular systolic function, using TEE-derived ejection fraction as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy will be calculated for detecting clinically significant systolic dysfunction (e.g., EF \< 30% or EF \< 40%).

    Time frame: During the decannulation phase of cardiopulmonary bypass (intraoperative period)

  2. Prediction of Postoperative Hemodynamic Support Requirement

    This outcome evaluates whether the surgeon's intraoperative visual assessment of left ventricular function predicts the need for postoperative hemodynamic support. Outcomes include the requirement for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), return to cardiopulmonary bypass, or initiation of high-dose inotropic therapy during or after separation from bypass.

    Time frame: From intraoperative decannulation through 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Correlation Between Quantitative TEE Measurements and Surgeon Visual Estimation

    This outcome examines the correlation between TEE-derived quantitative parameters (ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume) and the categorical visual estimation provided by the cardiac surgeon (normal, moderately reduced, severely reduced). Correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) will be calculated.

    Time frame: During the decannulation phase of cardiopulmonary bypass

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim H. Weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Jun;64(6):487-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.6.487. No abstract available. PubMed 23814646 ↗
  • Abazid RM, Abohamr SI, Smettei OA, Qasem MS, Suresh AR, Al Harbi MF, Aljaber AN, Al Motairy AA, Albiela DE, Almutairi BM, Sakr H. Visual versus fully automated assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. Avicenna J Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;8(2):41-45. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_209_17. PubMed 29682476 ↗
  • Metkus TS, Thibault D, Grant MC, Badhwar V, Jacobs JP, Lawton J, O'Brien SM, Thourani V, Wegermann ZK, Zwischenberger B, Higgins R. Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.064. Epub 2021 May 3. PubMed 33957241 ↗
  • Bayram E, Gulcu O, Aksu U, Aksakal E, Birdal O, Kalkan K. Evaluating the Association Between the Three Different Ejection Fraction Measurement Techniques and Left Ventricle Global Strain. Eurasian J Med. 2018 Oct;50(3):173-177. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17409. PubMed 30515038 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The decision regarding IPD sharing has not yet been finalized. If data sharing is pursued in the future, it will involve de-identified datasets and will comply with institutional and ethical regulations.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2025
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2, 2026
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07286227
Lead sponsor
Ataturk University
Responsible party
Muhammed E Aydin (DOÇENT.DR, Ataturk University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammed Enes Aydin, Associate Professor
Contact
enesmd@msn.com
+90-554-331-82-89
Filiz Albayrak, assistant doctor
Contact
zlfalbyrk@gmail.com
+90-545-226-98-49
Muhammed Enes Aydın, Principal Investigator
principal investigator · Ataturk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion