ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07271030Updated Aug 25, 2026

The Use of Cannabidiol Suppositories for Sexual Pain

An interventional study of Cannabidiol suppository intervention 1 and Cannabidiol suppository intervention 2 in Well-Being, Psychological, Quality of Life and Sexual Behavior, sponsored by London Metropolitan University. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Primary conditionSexual BehaviorRegistry: Psychological Well-BeingReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Psychological Well-Being — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sexual Behavior
Why
  1. Psychological Well-Being is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Sexual Behavior.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by London Metropolitan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Research aim: To determine how cannabidiol suppositories might reduce sexual pain during intimacy. Outcomes are also hoped to increase sexual functioning, well-being, and quality of life.

Research intention: If cannabidiol suppository intervention reduces sexual pain and increases general well-being, then this research would be repeated on a larger scale, targeting psychosexual services.

A brief overview of the intervention:

Quantitatively, randomisation of cannabidiol suppositories will be into dose-specific groups. The intervention will be delivered over a period of one month, with follow-up scheduled at 12 weeks. Qualitatively, participants were asked approximately eight open-ended feedback questions throughout the study.

Read the detailed description

Sexual pain is a constellation of biopsychosocial disorders which affects men, women and their partners.

Cannabidiol is one of approximately 100 cannabinoids found in cannabis, alongside tetrahydrocannabinol. Cannabidiol is non-intoxicating and regarded as a safe product to use. Cannabidiol has many applications, including in sexual health. Two studies have examined cannabidiol suppositories for supporting sexual function and reducing sexual pain. In both studies, outcomes suggested the pain relieving qualities of cannabidiol oil for both men and women.

This research aims to establish the effectiveness of varied doses of cannabidiol oil to minimise sexual pain and increase well-being. This research is a preliminary study looking at how cannabidiol suppositories aim to reduce pain and support sexual function, wellbeing and quality of life among those experiencing sexual discomfort or pain during intercourse or masturbation.

There will be four groups, where cannabidiol will be randomised to dose-specific groups, approximately 30, 50, and 100mg, under the guidance of a medical practitioner. There will also be a care as usual group.

It is hypothesised that:

Higher levels of sexual functioning, quality of life and wellbeing with lower levels of sexual pain will be reported among those using cannabidiol suppositories at the follow-up after intervention compared to care as usual group.

It is further hypothesised that higher doses of cannabidiol suppositories will have higher levels of sexual pain-reducing outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Well-Being, Psychological
  • Quality of Life
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Sexual Pain Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Sexual Behavior Reclassified

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexual Behavior; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 264 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Sexual Behavior.

Browse Sexual Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

London Metropolitan University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Compared within Sexual Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Psychological Well-Being. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has previously used cannabidiol in any capacity and has not experienced any allergic reaction
  • Is experiencing sexual pain
  • There will be an absence of co occurring difficulties
  • Has attempted sexual intercourse in the last month
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Read and write English
  • Patient Health Questionnaire 9 screening score range between 0-9 mild
  • General Anxiety Disorder 7 screening score range between 0-9 mild
  • There are no restrictions on sex, gender, sexuality, or disability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Has experienced an allergic reaction to cannabidiol in any capacity

  • Has not attempted sexual intercourse in the last month
  • Has co occurring difficulties
  • Aged below 18 years old
  • Are not experiencing sexual pain
  • Patient Health Questionnaire 9 screening score range between moderate to severe - 10-27
  • General Anxiety Disorder 7 screening score range between 10- 21.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cannabidiol 30mg

    This will be a dose specific suppository of 30mg, which will be used for one month. Frequency will depend on how often the participant engages in sexual intimacy.

    Dietary Supplement: Cannabidiol suppository intervention 1

  • Experimental
    Cannabidiol 50mg

    This will be a dose specific suppository of 50mg, which will be used for one month. Frequency will depend on how often the participant engages in sexual intimacy.

    Dietary Supplement: Cannabidiol suppository intervention 2

  • Experimental
    Cannabidiol 100mg

    This will be a dose specific suppository of 100mg, which will be used for one month. Frequency will depend on how often the participant engages in sexual intimacy.

    Dietary Supplement: Cannabidiol suppository intervention 3

  • Active comparator
    Care as usual

    This is the care as usual group, which will be the control for comparative outcomes with sexual function, sexual pain, well being and quality of life.

    Other: Non cannabidiol group control

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementCannabidiol suppository intervention 1

    Cannabidiol suppository dose specific 30mg

  • Dietary supplementCannabidiol suppository intervention 2

    Cannabidiol suppository dose specific 50mg

  • Dietary supplementCannabidiol suppository intervention 3

    Cannabidiol suppository dose specific 100mg

  • OtherNon cannabidiol group control

    Care as usual group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Female Sexual Function Index

    This is a 19 item measure of sexual pain, sexual desire, orgasm, lubrication, and sexual satisfaction with five response categories. The score range is 2.0 to 36.0 with 26.0 being the cut of for sexual dysfunction. Example questions include, Over the past 4 weeks, how often did you experience discomfort or pain during vaginal penetration? and Over the past 4 weeks, how would you rate your level of discomfort or pain during or following vaginal penetration? Cronbach alpha for this questionnaire is .820 and higher.

    Time frame: 0, 4 and 12 weeks

  2. The Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale

    This is a 7 item questionnaire with 5 response categories looking at functioning and feeling aspects of well-being. The response categories include 1=none of the time to 5=all of the time. Cronbach alpha for the questionnaire is 0.89-0.91. There is no reverse scoring. Scores range from 7 to 35 where the latter is the highest level of wellbeing.

    Time frame: 0, 4 and 12 weeks

  3. Brief Quality of Life Scale

    An 8 item questionnaire with five response categories looking at satisfaction with self, friends, family and creativity. This scale is scored by transforming the individual item scores from a 1 to 5 scale to a 0 to 100 scale. Example responses include how I view my life as necessary for my quality of life, and I am satisfied with my friends and friendship: The Cronbach alpha is .760 for this questionnaire

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4 and 12

  4. Changes in levels of anal pain taken

    The frequency and severity of pain during anal sex, this is a 5-point Likert-type scale which ranges from never (5) to all the time (1) and no anal pain (5) to severe anal pain (1). The Cronbach alpha in this study= 0.70.

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4 and 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • School of Social Sciences and Professions
    London, N7 8DB, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitchell KR, Geary R, Graham CA, Datta J, Wellings K, Sonnenberg P, Field N, Nunns D, Bancroft J, Jones KG, Johnson AM, Mercer CH. Painful sex (dyspareunia) in women: prevalence and associated factors in a British population probability survey. BJOG. 2017 Oct;124(11):1689-1697. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14518. Epub 2017 Jan 25. PubMed 28120373 ↗
  • Nimbi FM, Rossi V, Tripodi F, Luria M, Flinchum M, Tambelli R, Simonelli C. Genital Pain and Sexual Functioning: Effects on Sexual Experience, Psychological Health, and Quality of Life. J Sex Med. 2020 Apr;17(4):771-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13. PubMed 32063471 ↗
  • Lo LA, Christiansen AL, Strickland JC, Pistawka CA, Eadie L, Vandrey R, MacCallum CA. Does acute cannabidiol (CBD) use impair performance? A meta-analysis and comparison with placebo and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Aug;49(9):1425-1436. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01847-w. Epub 2024 Mar 25. PubMed 38528133 ↗
  • Boardman LA, Stockdale CK. Sexual pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;52(4):682-90. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181bf4a7e. PubMed 20393420 ↗
  • Damon W, Rosser BR. Anodyspareunia in men who have sex with men: prevalence, predictors, consequences and the development of DSM diagnostic criteria. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):129-41. doi: 10.1080/00926230590477989. PubMed 15859372 ↗
  • Haroutounian S, Ratz Y, Ginosar Y, Furmanov K, Saifi F, Meidan R, Davidson E. The Effect of Medicinal Cannabis on Pain and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Prospective Open-label Study. Clin J Pain. 2016 Dec;32(12):1036-1043. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000364. PubMed 26889611 ↗
  • Rosser BR, Short BJ, Thurmes PJ, Coleman E. Anodyspareunia, the unacknowledged sexual dysfunction: a validation study of painful receptive anal intercourse and its psychosexual concomitants in homosexual men. J Sex Marital Ther. 1998 Oct-Dec;24(4):281-92. doi: 10.1080/00926239808403963. PubMed 9805288 ↗
  • Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. PubMed 10782451 ↗
  • Banbury S, Tharmalingam H, Lusher J, Erridge S, Chandler C. A Preliminary Investigation into the Use of Cannabis Suppositories and Online Mindful Compassion for Improving Sexual Function Among Women Following Gynaecological Cancer Treatment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 7;60(12):2020. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122020. PubMed 39768900 ↗
  • Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63. PubMed 18042300 ↗
  • Lindner P, Frykheden O, Forsstrom D, Andersson E, Ljotsson B, Hedman E, Andersson G, Carlbring P. The Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ): Development and Psychometric Evaluation. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016 Apr;45(3):182-95. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1143526. Epub 2016 Feb 17. PubMed 26886248 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 18 months after the start.

Of 106 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sexual Behavior, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 107 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2025
First posted
Dec 8, 2025
StartActual
Jan 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07271030
Lead sponsor
London Metropolitan University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 8, 2025
Start date
Jan 16, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Kamyk
Contact
rpo@londonmet.ac.uk
02074230000
Samantha Banbury
principal investigator · London Metropolitan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion