CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07261566Updated Dec 3, 2025

Assessment of Core Muscles Endurance, Lumber Curvature and Function in Smartphone-addicts With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

An observational study in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-03.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will attempt to assess the relation between, core muscle endurance, lumber spine curvature and function among smartphone-addicts university students with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Read the detailed description

It has been demonstrated that using a smartphone increases lumbar and cervical flexion. Moreover, using a smartphone while slouched increased the strain on the lumbar spine's muscles and capsular structures. Similarly, in other research, individuals with or without low back pain (LBP) experienced greater thoracic kyphosis and lumber lordosis following a brief period of smart phone use while seated.

In adults, mechanical LBP is frequently reported. Notably, there are several risk factors, including the excessive use of electronic and handheld electronic devices. Additionally, Back pain is linked to morphological changes in multifidus and erector spinae as a cross-sectional region.

In addition, core muscles are crucial for carrying out different motions or sustaining postures in day-to-day activities, particularly when sitting in a chair. They not only help to maintain endurance but also give the trunk muscles stability. Furthermore, weakness of the trunk muscles has been identified as a risk factor for LBP. Similarly, weak trunk muscular strength was linked to poor balance and functional performance. As a result, core muscle dysfunction leads to decreased trunk muscular strength, dynamic balance, and functional mobility.

Given these concerns, it is necessary to conduct further studies on the musculoskeletal problems linked to smartphone use. Therefore, all individuals experiencing musculoskeletal discomfort especially mechanical LBP should have their smartphone addiction level examined. Special attention should be given to addressing smartphone addiction and its musculoskeletal consequences on undergraduate students. Since young adults are a population that uses mobile phones often, they are an urgent group to investigate. However, no study has investigated the impact of smartphone use on the spinal and pelvic posture during standing and walking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 65 is below the median of 100 across 475 observational studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study was conducted with a total of 65 participants. They were assigned into two groups, consisting of both genders with smartphone addiction according to the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), and university students who had been experiencing chronic nonspecific low back pain for a period of at least six months

Inclusion criteria

  • University students who have been experiencing chronic nonspecific low back pain for a period of at least six months
  • Both genders
  • Smartphone addicted cut-off points for smartphone addiction at 31 for men and 33 for women in smartphone addiction scale short version
  • Age is ranged from 18-25 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they don't fulfil the inclusion criteria or if they have one of the following:
  • Athletes
  • Any history of spinal trauma or dysfunction
  • Systemic disease presenting in the back (such as ankylosing spondylitis)
  • Spinal deformity
  • Leg length discrepancy
  • History of spinal, abdominal or orthopedic surgery
  • Patients who are under treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
65 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Smartphone-addicted participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

    This group included 33 smartphone-addicted participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

    Other: non

  • Smartphone-addicted participants without chronic nonspecific low back pain.

    This group included 32 smartphone-addicted participants without chronic nonspecific low back pain.

    Other: non

Interventions

  • Othernon
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of smartphone addiction

    Smartphone addiction is examined using the Smartphone Addiction scale (SAS), which is a self-diagnosis instrument that identifies smartphone addicts. The final version included 33 items that revealed the presence of six subscales, including daily life disruption, positive anticipation, withdrawal, cyberspace-oriented connection, overuse, and tolerance. The items are assessed on a six-point Likert scale as follows: strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), weakly disagree (3), weakly agree (4), agree (5), and strongly agree (6). The total of the six subscales equals the SAS score, which ranges from 33 to 198; higher scores indicate more addicted behavior with smartphone use.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Assessment of lumbar spinal curvature

    Kinovea software will be used to measure lumbar spinal curvature. The subject should be positioned in a sidelong stance without footwear, aligned with their back against a calibration plane, and their shoulders and elbows flexed at an angle of 90 degrees. Clearly delineate both earlobes on the subject Ascertain the critical reference points along the lumbar spine at 12 thoracic vertebra, third lumbar vertebra and first sacral vertebra. To ascertain the lordosis angle, identify the point on the lumbar spine that is nearest to the plumb line. Construct two lines that run parallel to the curvature of the lumbar region at both the superior and inferior aspects. Employ Kinovea to measure the angle formed at the intersection of these two lines. Deduct this measurement from 180° to derive the lordosis angle

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Assessment of trunk anterior flexor test

    During the trunk anterior flexor test, individuals sit with their hands over their chest, trunk flexed to sixty degrees, and knee flexed to ninety degrees, time starts when participants adopt the measured posture and ends when the trunk deviates from the 60º angle. The investigator uses the commands 'start' and 'stop' to begin and end the test, while an assisting investigator uses a stopwatch to record the times

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Assessment of lateral musculature plank test

    It will be applied for both sides. In the left lateral musculature plank test, participants' feet are placed one on top of the other, the right arm perpendicular to the floor, elbow lying on the mat, left arm across the chest, and left hand on the right shoulder. A similar position is used for the right lateral musculature plank test, with the left arm perpendicular to the floor. The investigator uses the commands 'start' and 'stop' to begin and end the test, while an assisting investigator uses a stopwatch to record the times. When the investigator observes an error in the line between the participants' trunk or lower body parts (thigh or shank), then time will be stopped.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Trunk posterior extensor test

    Participants lie prone on an examination table for the trunk posterior extensor test, with both anterior superior iliac spines (ASISs) on the table's edge and their hands on the seat of a chair positioned in front of them. Assistance held the lower extremities above and below the participants' knees to secure the lower body. Time begins when participants establish a horizontal posture of the trunk, detach their hands from the chair and then cross them over their chest, and time will be stopped when participants are unable to maintain that position.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Assessment of back functional disability

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is regarded as the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome instruments. The questionnaire measures the level of impairment in ten activities of daily living: Pain intensity, Personal care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex (if applicable), Social, Travel. Each item has six statements that are evaluated from 0 to 5. The overall score is determined as a percentage, with 0% representing no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ahd Ramadan Mohamed
    Giza, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07261566
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Ahd Ramadan (Principal investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2025
Start date
Nov 30, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 5, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 25, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 3, 2025

Study contacts

Ahd R Mohamed, Master
Contact
10722023487668@pg.cu.edu.eg
01115392633
Dina S Abduallah, PHD
Contact
drdinasayed_ptW@yahoo.com
01282742057
Rabab M Monged, PHD
study director · 6 October university
Salwa F Abdelmaged, Professor
study chair · Cairo University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion